Crystal-Clear
SENIOR MEMBER
hindustan do and hindustanis toobut india did not exist before 1947 either. You just contradicted your own arguement.
.before 1947 it was british "india".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
hindustan do and hindustanis toobut india did not exist before 1947 either. You just contradicted your own arguement.
.britsh india and mughal hindustan included modern pakistan.hindustan do and hindustanis too.
before 1947 it was british "india".
so after all discussion according to you hindustan face 10000 years of slaverybritsh india and mughal hindustan included modern pakistan.
. so after all discussion according to you hindustan face 10000 years of slavery  .
.
which includes 800 years of Muslims and 200 of British.
lol ok if it makes u sleep well . hindustan isnt a slave it was Pakistan that exist even before jesus (a.s)u
You are saying that pakistan was also enslaved b mughals and british. The difference is before you were enslaved by greeks, kushans, Hunas, and Indian Mauryans and guptas.So by your logic Pakistan was enslaved 10000 years, India for only 1000 years![]()

what a vedic knowledge 

Idiot hindustan included pakistan. When you say Hindustan was enslaved you are saying Pakistan was enslaved. And did the land that includes modern Pakistan appear out of thin air? It existed even before the modern nation state of pakistan.lol ok if it makes u sleep well . hindustan isnt a slave it was Pakistan that exist even before jesus (a.s)what a vedic knowledge
![]()
i too says Muslims rule hindustan for 800 yearsIdiot hindustan included pakistan. When you say Hindustan was enslaved you are saying Pakistan was enslaved. And did the land that includes modern Pakistan appear out of thin air? It existed even before the modern nation state of pakistan.
.and whete were those muslims from? Not pakistan. And most of modern india was not ruled by muslims for a long time. The time Significant parts of modern india was ruled by muslims is barely 100 years. For the rest of the time, mudlim rule was mostly limited to northern india. Again everything i have stated is a fact, if you dont believe me look t up.i too says Muslims rule hindustan for 800 years.
atlast you admit hindustan was being enslaved by Muslimsand whete were those muslims from? Not pakistan. And most of modern india was not ruled by muslims for a long time. The time Significant parts of modern india was ruled by muslims is barely 100 years. For the rest of the time, mudlim rule was mostly limited to northern india. Again everything i have stated is a fact, if you dont believe me look t up.
sure parts of hindustan were ruled by muslims for a couple centuries. MOst of it was not. Pakistan on the other hnd was enslaved by various powers for 10000 years.atlast you admit hindustan was being enslaved by Muslims
sure parts of hindustan were ruled by muslims for a couple centuries. MOst of it was not. Pakistan on the other hnd was enslaved by various powers for 10000 years.


Glad you are admitting I am correct.
bhai mey to pehley sey hi janta hu bharat mata is a characterless bitch har invader k sath so jati thi .Glad you are admitting I am correct.