Azad-Kashmiri
FULL MEMBER
This was supposed to be an Indian-only thread. But some Pakistanis were urged to join and troll![]()
![]()
![]()
You should have wrote Indians only! Like the British did in the bygone era!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This was supposed to be an Indian-only thread. But some Pakistanis were urged to join and troll![]()
![]()
![]()
I tagged only Indian members, I believeYou should have wrote Indians only! Like the British did in the bygone era!

our army doesn't take politic decision but your does.Same for Indian army, Iranian army and so on. All national armies need external threats to remain "relevant". What kind of argument is that?![]()
![]()
![]()
We have outsourced our country's foreign policy to our national army. It makes them stronger in face of coward career politicians.our army doesn't take politic decision but your does.
The problem with India is they are not mature as a society yet.
They behave with Western countries because of centuries of British rule have trained them into be subservient to them.
With everyone else they behave like an erratic teenage girl who doesn't know what she wants out of an interaction. Its bizarre.
They can make money but not know how to behave with their neighbors. They need to evolve.
politician aren't coward but they don't repersent extremely right wing hawkish side. military is trained to die for their country while politician want to run country (if you don't get the difference then no problem bro just ignore lil indian me )We have outsourced our country's foreign policy to our national army. It makes them stronger in face of coward career politicians.
India wants cordial ties with Pakistan but Islamabad must 'change its approach': Rajnath Singh
By Web Desk
Published: July 2, 2015
![]()
Indian Home Minister Rajnath Singh. PHOTO: REUTERS
SRINIGAR: Despite the tone and tenor of its recent actions, Indian Home Minister Rajnath Singh said on Thursday that his country desired cordial relations with Pakistan, but asked Islamabad “to change its approach” for this to happen.
“I want to say from the depth of my heart that we want good and friendly relations with Pakistan. It is our policy to have cordial relations with all our neighbouring countries, including Pakistan,” Singh told reporters on the concluding day of his two-day visit to Indian Kashmir.
Sindh said Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi had invited his Pakistani counterpart Nawaz Sharif to attend his swearing-in ceremony in May 2014 to “demonstrate India’s urge for peaceful and normal relations with that country.”
“We made our intentions clear on the day of the oath-taking ceremony (of Modi). If it was not our intention to improve relations with Pakistan, perhaps our prime minister would not have invited Sharif,” he explained.
Referring to former Indian prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s comment on Pakistan that “friends change, but neighbours don’t,” Singh said, “We also believe in that. There will be no let up in our efforts but Pakistan will have to think about it (too). It takes two hands to clap.”
Foreign Secretary Aizaz Chaudhry last month said Pakistan wanted to have a “normal” relationship with India, for which there is also a political consensus in the country, but Islamabad’s efforts were not being reciprocated by New Delhi.
Chaudhry said it was the Indian government, and not Pakistan, which had put a stop to the Indo-Pak dialogue.
In the recent weeks, both the countries have accused each other of sponsoring terrorism with a war of words continuing from both sides.
The article originally appeared on One India
India wants cordial ties with Pakistan but Islamabad must 'change its approach': Rajnath Singh - The Express Tribune
Winds of change? What happened to that good old hawkish Modi?![]()
![]()
@13 komaun @[Bregs] @agamdilawari @airuah @Ajit Kumar @Ammyy @anant_s @Arav_Rana @ASB @Avik274 @Bagha @bhangi bava @bloo @blood @Blue_Eyes @Bombaywalla @Brahmos_2 @cerberus @Chanakya's_Chant @chhota bheem @danish_vij @desert warrior @DRAY @Echo_419 @eowyn @Etilla @farhan_9909 @Force-India @gau8av @genmirajborgza786 @Georgeclark @gslv mk3 @halupridol @haviZsultan @he-man @illusion8 @Ind4Ever @indiatester @IndoUS @Indrani @itachiii @ito @jaiind @JanjaWeed @kadamba-warrior @karan.1970 @khujliwal @Krate M @kurup @levina @lightoftruth @magudi @Major Shaitan Singh @Manindra @Marxist @me_itsme @Mike_Brando @MilSpec @Mukunda Murthi Rao @Nair saab @naveen mishra @noksss @Not Sure @Omega007 @OrionHunter @PARIKRAMA @pumkinduke @pursuit of happiness @r1_vns @rahi2357 @Rain Man @ranjeet @ravi Nair @RayOfLight @Razia Sultana @ROCKING @Rohit Patel @rubyjackass @Ryuzaki @sajan @SamantK @SAMEET @Samudra Manthan @SarthakGanguly @Sidak @Skull and Bones @Sneaker @SpArK @Spectre @sreekumar @Srinivas @SrNair @Star Wars @surya kiran @SwAggeR @Syama Ayas @Tea addict @thesolar65 @utraash @VeeraBahadur @vostok @WAR-rior @Water Car Engineer @wolfpack @wolfschanzze @Yogijaat
Bristish rule of India :/
we wanna be like them but can't resist their culture like mard emomin Pakistani superior race.
I don't see any problem with a national institution such as armed forces making its country's foreign policy. Unless our career politicians have some military background as is the case with almost all Israeli politicians, its dangerous to let these fools be in charge of a nation's foreign interests.politician aren't coward but they don't repersent extremely right wing hawkish side. military is trained to die for their country while politician want to run country (if you don't get the difference then no problem bro just ignore lil indian me )
You have only India to contend with. Your entire military has just one 'enemy'. We have Pakistan as well as China. That's the difference. So, as long as China is a threat, our army will always remain relevant even if there's peace with Pakistan.Same for Indian army, Iranian army and so on. All national armies need external threats to remain "relevant". What kind of argument is that?![]()
![]()
![]()

It's a well known fact that security and foreign policy is controlled by the Pak Army. By the way, do you even know who Pakistan's defence minister is? We haven't seen hair nor hide of him yet!! 
Pakistan has evolved. Leadership is mature with foreign policy. India has been given plenty of chances in the last 4 years despite disgusting LOC behavior.
Enough is enough and these silly statements by your foreign office will not work anymore.

That's actually a dilemma. Both countries accuse each other for terrorism and neither accept any responsibility. Its not even funny any more!I bet once India changes her policy of supporting terrorism in Pakistan and other countries, she will have a great friend in Pakistan and will only trebble the growth rate she is experiencing now.

I don't see any problem with a national institution such as armed forces making its country's foreign policy. Unless our career politicians have some military background as is the case with almost all Israeli politicians, its dangerous to let these fools be in charge of a nation's foreign interests.
well we don't have functioning democracy like you and neither good politicians
well if you don't nuke us lil indians then i will count this silly statement working![]()