What's new

India to omit discriminatory investment policy for Bangladeshis

Black_cats

ELITE MEMBER
Dec 31, 2010
10,032
-5
14,469
India to omit discriminatory investment policy for Bangladeshis

FE ONLINE REPORT | Published: September 29, 2020 18:04:13 | Updated: September 29, 2020 19:41:15
India to omit discriminatory investment policy for Bangladeshis


India has agreed to omit discriminatory investment policy for Bangladeshis.
The assurance came during the 6th Joint Consultative Commission meeting held virtually on Tuesday.

Both the countries agreed to bring down border killing by the BSF to zero.

Though India reiterated its assurance for inking the Teesta water sharing deal, no specific time frame was mentioned by India, Foreign Minister Dr AK Abdul Momen told a briefing after the KCC meeting.

Both sides agreed to form a secretary level committee to expedite the implementation of the LoC projects.

mirmostafiz@yahoo.com

 
This was a useless ask.

Which Bangladeshi business-person in their right mind would want to invest in Indian market and what for?

It is a large market, but it is plagued with (again) the 'dreaded Hindu rate of growth'. And Indian Govt. can impose NTB or non-tariff barriers as any time, whenever the Banyas run to New Delhi with whatever 'unfair trade' invented excuse they can cook up.


For those unfamiliar with the term, it is not a name calling exercise, this was pegged at about 3.5% for the Nehruvian planned economy, which did a lot worse than predicted.

Ultimately. massive Chori (corruption+graft) by leaders was the primary cause helped by a clueless uneducated electorate.

While the tiger economies of Asia prospered (South Korea especially), the whole subcontinent more or less foundered because of Chori.
 
This was a useless ask.

Which Bangladeshi business-person in their right mind would want to invest in Indian market and what for?

It is a large market, but it is plagued with (again) the 'dreaded Hindu rate of growth'. And Indian Govt. can impose NTB or non-tariff barriers as any time, whenever the Banyas run to New Delhi with whatever 'unfair trade' invented excuse they can cook up.


For those unfamiliar with the term, it is not a name calling exercise, this was pegged at about 3.5% for the Nehruvian planned economy, which did a lot worse than predicted.

Ultimately. massive Chori (corruption+graft) by leaders was the primary cause helped by a clueless uneducated electorate.

While the tiger economies of Asia prospered (South Korea especially), the whole subcontinent more or less foundered because of Chori.

One of my favorite topics is economics, free-market policies, and when nationalism works.

Not quite sure where your advice is coming from because you guys love to hate each other. But I will bite and ask the question: Does this advise include shunning their market for Bangladeshis companies to sell their products to?

Have you considered some factors why a company will invest in another country and be a good thing for the home country?
  1. While the company continues in the home country. They are trying to expand and sell into a larger market to increase revenues.
  2. The products that the company produces has a better global supply chain and again it's about increasing revenues while maintaining a home base
  3. The labor market is more skilled, has a bigger labor base of skilled laborers allowing the company to fulfill bigger volumes.
  4. The market is offering incentives such as big tax break, free land lease for years, infrastructure assistance, etc, which is a very attractive growth strategy requiring less capital investment
  5. All of them above bringing additional revenues into Bangladesh possibly, to reinvest in additional high growth ventures. US companies have invested in other countries that have allowed them to reinvest in higher-value products and services in the US. You did not see Apple leaving the US or shrinking its workforce in the US by its investment in other countries, did ya?
 
One of my favorite topics is economics, free-market policies, and when nationalism works.

Not quite sure where your advice is coming from because you guys love to hate each other. But I will bite and ask the question: Does this advise include shunning their market for Bangladeshis companies to sell their products to?

Have you considered some factors why a company will invest in another country and be a good thing for the home country?
  1. While the company continues in the home country. They are trying to expand and sell into a larger market to increase revenues.
  2. The products that the company produces has a better global supply chain and again it's about increasing revenues while maintaining a home base
  3. The labor market is more skilled, has a bigger labor base of skilled laborers allowing the company to fulfill bigger volumes.
  4. The market is offering incentives such as big tax break, free land lease for years, infrastructure assistance, etc, which is a very attractive growth strategy requiring less capital investment
  5. All of them above bringing additional revenues into Bangladesh possibly, to reinvest in additional high growth ventures. US companies have invested in other countries that have allowed them to reinvest in higher-value products and services in the US. You did not see Apple leaving the US or shrinking its workforce in the US by its investment in other countries, did ya?

Well obviously you don't have backgrounds, ideas or experiences we in Bangladesh have as far as investing in Indian market, or specifically, how they conduct business affairs with outsiders like us, which is a continuation of 50's socialist Nehruvian economics - which dictates a closed protected economy supplying its own needs, price controls to some extent, supplying inferior third rate products to a highly price-sensitive market for a very large group of miserly customers, a coterie of local oligopolies which are groomed and helped by the corrupt state apparatus in exchange for graft and bribes.

I suspect you may be a false -flagger Indian (given your anti-Chinese stance) - but will give you the benefit of the doubt.

We don't hate Indians as a group per se - but we are not overly fond of their racist, fascist, communal politicians (currently in power, ruining India) and businessmen who are (in one word) largely composed of cheaters and frauds.

Indians don't like outsiders profiting off of their market. But the sad story is, they cannot compete internationally in an open market with their third rate products either, since their production is so inefficient with sub-par back-dated machinery and processes.

Long story short - we have had forty plus years of experience dealing with Indian businesses, and we have seen enough of their unfair trade practices and one-sided dealings that selfishly benefit only their side. They don't know the meaning of the word "fair-trade". They have profited to the tune of $30 billion yearly from us for at least the last three decades, when you consider uneven trade, their citizens illegally working within Bangladesh remitting money, and our medical and recreational tourism in India.

Enough is enough.

Time is ripe for cutting trade (and tourism) ties with India and opening up with countries (like China, Turkey, S. Korea or Indonesia) who have as big a market - but don't cheat as much as Indian businesses do and at least appreciate fair balanced trade with us. Chinese businesses or other that of other countries at least don't have mal-intent to manipulate our markets. The world is a big place, we have options. If India is as effed up as it is, we don't have to deal with them.

We are not obligated to do business with fascists.

I have taken the time to explain - but this will be my last communication on this. The Internet is wide open and Google is your friend.
 
Last edited:
Well obviously you don't have backgrounds, ideas or experiences we in Bangladesh have as far as investing in Indian market, or specifically, how they conduct business affairs with outsiders like us, which is a continuation of 50's socialist Nehruvian economics - which dictates a closed protected economy supplying its own needs, price controls to some extent, supplying inferior third rate products to a highly price-sensitive market for a very large group of miserly customers, a coterie of local oligopolies which are groomed and helped by the corrupt state apparatus in exchange for graft and bribes.

I suspect you may be Indian (given your anti-Chinese stance) - but will give you the benefit of the doubt.

We don't hate Indians as a group per se - but we are not overly fond of their racist, fascist, communal politicians (currently in power, ruining India) and businessmen who are (in one word) largely composed of cheaters and frauds.

Indians don't like outsiders profiting off of their market. But the sad story is, they cannot compete internationally in an open market with their third rate products either, since their production is so inefficient with sub-par back-dated machinery and processes.

Long story short - we have had forty plus years of experience dealing with Indian businesses, and we have seen enough of their unfair trade practices and one-sided dealings that selfishly benefit only their side. They don't know the meaning of the word "fair-trade". They have profited to the tune of $30 billion yearly from us for at least the last three decades, when you consider uneven trade, their citizens illegally working within Bangladesh remitting money, and our medical and recreational tourism in India.

Enough is enough.

Time is ripe for cutting trade (and tourism) ties with India and opening up with countries (like China, Turkey, S. Korea or Indonesia) who have as big a market - but don't cheat as much as Indian businesses do and at least appreciate fair balanced trade with us. Chinese businesses or other that of other countries at least don't have mal-intent to manipulate our markets. The world is a big place, we have options. If India is as effed up as it is, we don't have to deal with them.

I have taken the time to explain - but this will be my last communication on this. The Internet is wide open and Google is your friend.
You are confusing trade deficits, with making an investment in a country. They literally have nothing to do with each other. Anyways, the motivation behind your anti-investment stance is not economic, as a part of me suspected.

But, I did learn that Donald Trump and a majority of Americans are now Indians for their ant-china sentiments. Thanks, for the time.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom