What's new

India seeks talks with Pak army, ISI chief

in 71 you were the agressors not us. Backup for my claim same UN for which you cry.
As far as siachin goes it was not demarked in the agreement. You tried but failed.

And as far mr syed goes he has alredy been inciting violence against india in recent speeches and can be booked under disrupting public harmony. It is a known fact that LeT is involved within india and he was the cheif of the same. Organisations run by him are not banned by but UN.

We were the agressors in our own country? who who the hell were u to train terrorists in a proxy war n jumping in it?Tht was state terrorism..
Siachin wasnt marked? so u can climb in with consent? we returned the favour in 99 ... tht time just got 4 highest stategic peaks under indian occupation in Kargil.
Inciting violence? u mean telling people to get their right?
Go tell tht to UN ... also if hold a refrendum in IOK....... not to forget answer abt ur war crimes in the worlds highest militarised jail..IOK.
 
I think Sri Lanka can promote India Pakistan Military ties

pakis3.jpg


17.jpg

nope................you are thinking wrong
 
they want to bypass Government and get direct with ARMY ? sounds fishy.

somewhere in their heads are they thinking they can establish American government-PAK army alike relations?

We will talk real ppl who are in power for decades in Pakistan now..

You yet to understand that who has power in your country?
 
We were the agressors in our own country? who who the hell were u to train terrorists in a proxy war n jumping in it?Tht was state terrorism..
Siachin wasnt marked? so u can climb in with consent? we returned the favour in 99 ... tht time just got 4 highest stategic peaks under indian occupation in Kargil.
Inciting violence? u mean telling people to get their right?
Go tell tht to UN ... also if hold a refrendum in IOK....... not to forget answer abt ur war crimes in the worlds highest militarised jail..IOK.

really ????........again???
 
we are alredy paani chors so why not do it and then get the blame instead of blame without anything...

let me expand the statement.......................now we can steal water and our friendly neighbourhood wont complain about it
 
Stones + Rs-100/- per day? please give increment this year yarr, inflation is so high now..

Oh, we recruited some throwers to police..,, youth gonna shower stones to their 'former' colleagues now..

According to ur media we give them 500 rs+drugs n stones.... :rofl:

Wat a retarded excuse.
 
Pak-Ind should go ahead from Mumbai & Samjhota issues because both countries must not let these issues as negotiation stopper, we have issues more important like Kashmir, Siachen & Sir creek.

Blaming each other will give nothing but more untruthfulness in relations. Libyan example is enough for both countries to solve their problems without any third participants.

Both country's population need a stable regional environment as positive negotiations will effect not only on military but on many other fields of cross relations.
 
one thing I never got to understand......................why Indian govt. is so much dieing for talks.....................what Pakistan has to offer to us??
 
We were the agressors in our own country? who who the hell were u to train terrorists in a proxy war n jumping in it?Tht was state terrorism..
Siachin wasnt marked? so u can climb in with consent? we returned the favour in 99 ... tht time just got 4 highest stategic peaks under indian occupation in Kargil.
Inciting violence? u mean telling people to get their right?
Go tell tht to UN ... also if hold a refrendum in IOK....... not to forget answer abt ur war crimes in the worlds highest militarised jail..IOK.

give me a link where in UN mukti bahini was declared a terrorist organization
secondly if it is not marked doesnt make it pakistani either. You tried to capture it politically and militarily by sending expedetions but failed.
Asking people to do violence against india i guess its birth right in pakistan then i guess. Tell me why is ex let chief roaming free when it is known that he was let and another of his organization is banned. Is it the inability of pakistanto have a control or unwillingness to act that a person with a backdrop of interntionally banned organization is given public spaces via media and public speeches
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom