OK. and yes those people are hopeless.Arre bhai I was calling those LET JEM and SOME pak people stupid who think like this as even PAK was INDIA'S part once so by the same reason even we should do the same thing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
OK. and yes those people are hopeless.Arre bhai I was calling those LET JEM and SOME pak people stupid who think like this as even PAK was INDIA'S part once so by the same reason even we should do the same thing.
sorry i was angry.
but really this thread deserves many thanks. the article is well written.
Come again..? Thread opened for Thanks..?
Arre bhai I was calling those LET JEM and SOME pak people stupid who think like this as even PAK was INDIA'S part once so by the same reason even we should do the same thing.
Yes completely agree but I think we should stick to topicThese some stupid people will also say that entire world was part of Pakistan, but who cares?
We should not do the same thing, rather we should just laugh at them.
Regards.

Many Pakistani Muslims believe that India was their patrimony from the Mughal Empire – stolen from them by the British, who bequeathed it to undeserving Hindus. This is why the leaders of the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT – ‘Army of the Pure’and the Jaish-e-Muhammed (JEM – the soldiers of Muhammed) dream of unfurling the Islamic green flag in the Red Fort in Delhi, as well as in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem.

Was such a long article, I first decided to read what the poster wanted us to read - bold parts.
There I encountered this multicolored piece -
And this is how I assess the intent and intellect of the author:
The reasoning begins with the statement "Many Pakistani Muslims believe that India was their patrimony from the Mughal Empire...". Next sentence goes on... "This is why...". The "why" plays the most important piece in this reasoning as it forms the justification for the premise - foundation of reasoning.
Then, the entire reasoning ends with the conclusion "...dream of unfurling the Islamic green flag in (at?) the Red Fort in Delhi, as well as in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem."
So, per the author, because the Pakistani Muslims think of India as their patrimony, they want unfurl their green flags in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem?
Rather than stating facts or using proper reasoning for an honest analysis, the author is pushing for some personal agenda with all his/her intellectual capacity.
Didn't bother to read the article after that.
and lets face it , every author has its own view and his article is affected by that view.India still has several options to explore before having to confront the need for some overt military or covert intelligence action. It could restrict commercial transport and tourist links with Pakistan; downgrade diplomatic relations; urge arms exporters not to sell armaments to Pakistan on pain of being blacklisted from bidding for lucrative Indian tenders; be more aggressive against Pakistan in international lending institutions; and press for escalating UN sanctions under anti-terrorism conventions and relevant Security Council resolutions. Like Ronald Reagan vis-à-vis the old Soviet Union, India could use its superior economic performance and potential to bankrupt a parity-obsessed Pakistan.
Indian foreign policy, military doctrine and the general security apparatus should not be Pakistani specific. If we want to be one of the pre-eminent world power, we have should not be bogged down by Pakistan. We should think beyond Pakistan.
Why did you fail to read Delhi before Tel Aviv. ?Was such a long article, I first decided to read what the poster wanted us to read - bold parts.
There I encountered this multicolored piece -
And this is how I assess the intent and intellect of the author:
The reasoning begins with the statement "Many Pakistani Muslims believe that India was their patrimony from the Mughal Empire...". Next sentence goes on... "This is why...". The "why" plays the most important piece in this reasoning as it forms the justification for the premise - foundation of reasoning.
Then, the entire reasoning ends with the conclusion "...dream of unfurling the Islamic green flag in (at?) the Red Fort in Delhi, as well as in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem."
So, per the author, because the Pakistani Muslims think of India as their patrimony, they want unfurl their green flags in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem?
Rather than stating facts or using proper reasoning for an honest analysis, the author is pushing for some personal agenda with all his/her intellectual capacity
Indeed a case of selective reading.Didn't bother to read the article after that.
i know sorry. i have already apologized.
Remember the main intention in opening a thread should be exchanging and sharing info not expecting something in return my friend.
Was such a long article, I first decided to read what the poster wanted us to read - bold parts.
There I encountered this multicolored piece -
And this is how I assess the intent and intellect of the author:
The reasoning begins with the statement "Many Pakistani Muslims believe that India was their patrimony from the Mughal Empire...". Next sentence goes on... "This is why...". The "why" plays the most important piece in this reasoning as it forms the justification for the premise - foundation of reasoning.
Then, the entire reasoning ends with the conclusion "...dream of unfurling the Islamic green flag in (at?) the Red Fort in Delhi, as well as in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem."
So, per the author, because the Pakistani Muslims think of India as their patrimony, they want unfurl their green flags in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem?
Rather than stating facts or using proper reasoning for an honest analysis, the author is pushing for some personal agenda with all his/her intellectual capacity.
Didn't bother to read the article after that.