LiberalAtheist
SENIOR MEMBER
Sikhs are not targeted by Hindu groups like RSS, Bajrang Dal, VHS, or w.e in fact the Akali Dal is allied with the BJP in the NDA nonetheless that does not mean people are still not pissed off about 1984
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Perhaps. But two wrongs don't make a right.There is a need to shut the faces of sikh fundamentalists... But quite ironic , govt doesnt want to reconcile with its citizens.
How about this, Hindu's getting married under Sikh marriage act??
Great, you would see Shiv sena , RSS and Bajrang Dal on roads like a GUnda.
LIAR, you are just Posting for SAKE of posting. you don't have IOTA of knowledge.
SIkhs had marriage CODE prior to independence CALLED as Anand Karaj act, drafted in 1909. So your statement, fails automatically.
Anand Karaj - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hahaha ,I may be a liar on few occasions , you are certainly an arrogant fool .Your post on this threads reek BS .
Back to Topic.
Civil marriage codes not only resister marriages under it , but also deal with disputes related marriage such as monogamy/pogamy , Divorce , property right , inheritance etc.
While muslim personal laws and divorce acts of christian comprehensively dealt with issue such as annulment of marriage and maintenance of wife thereafter , no dharmic religion including sikhs marriage called Anand Karaj has no concept of divorce in it ,since marriage in dharmic religions were/are supposed last seven births.
Anyway therefore there was need to standardize all aspects related to personal laws of dharmic groups and to address that comprehensive bills were created such as Hindu marriage act etc as part of Hindu personal laws.
your problem lies only the name ,/b] then i can't help it expect that you should remember not only sikhs , but Buddhist, Jains, animist etc also comes under the Hindu marriage act .
Civil marriage codes not only resister marriages under it , but also deal with disputes related marriage such as monogamy/pogamy , Divorce , property right , inheritance etc.
.

So you are assuming that Anand Karaj act drafted in 1909 didn't had talks about these issues..
Very smart...Go and re-read the full act again.
You are acting exactly the way i expected.![]()
Sikhism favour family life and monogamy. The ideal family is one where there is mutual love and respect between the husband and the wife and their children and grand children if any. The Anand Marriage Act, 1909, gave a wife status equal to that of her husband. The marriage establishes a permanant relationship between the partners and there is no provision for a divorce under this Act, for the Sikh marriage (Anand Karaj) is a sacrament and not a civil contract. However, in olden times if the marriage broke down, the woman would leave her husband and go and stay with her parents. Nowadays, the partners may live separately, or apply for a divorce after some time, under the Hindu code or the civil marriage Act. At that time, it is for the court to decide to grant a divorce or not, and in case the divorce is decided by the Court, it may make a provision for the support of the woman and the custory of the children and their maintenance. The Sikhs have no Personal Law, but they are covered under the Hindu Code in India. However, in certain cases, the custom of chaddar, which implies the present of a bedsheet by a man to a woman indicating his decision to take her as his wife is legal in Punjab
http://www.gurmat.info/sms/smspublications/introductiontosikhism2/chapter7.html#What is the Sikh attitude to divorce?[/B
what is bad in this act ?
why india crying. ?
I really hoped my fellow Indian friend had some maturity to read and understand, and its really good to interact with you Mr Manmohan singh. Indeed you are the right person to speak on behalf of everyone![]()
Politicians are busy renaming all Indian cities, if Sikhs want to read Sikh Marriage Act on certificate whats wrong in that? you guys are trolling, Sanatan Dharam/Hindu/Khalistan etc technicalities are just face saving tactics in front of Pakistanis on this forum. If you cant accept discrimination, Then at least don't rub it in everyone's face. Shame on you all of you. You relate proud Sikh to Khalistani.