India-Pakistan Nuclear Standoff: What Does the West Have at Stake in South Asia?

[GHALIB]

Trolling and face saving as usual @GHALIB

whoa ?
you don't believe world have faith in pakistan because it speaks truth ?

 

[Ultima Thule]

whoa ?
you don't believe world have faith in pakistan because it speaks truth ?

Still trolling @GHALIB

 

[MultaniGuy]

Says the country who threatens even Israel with Nuclear bomb. History suggests Pakistan was the one planning for Nuclear strikes in India that is in 1999. Anyway, India need not threaten Pakistan with a Nuclear strike, our conventional capability is enough for that.


You need to read about Nuclear blast radius. It takes a lot more than 120 warheads to destroy entire nation and say wipe out and stuff.

Our nuclear weapon blast radius is big enough to destroy your cities.

Do you honestly think India will survive 120 nuclear weapon strikes? We will poison your rivers, your farmland destroyed, and your people will be sickened by nuclear radiation poisoning. It will be a burden on your Healthcare system

 

[GHALIB]

Our nuclear weapon blast radius is big enough to destroy your cities.

Do you honestly think India will survive 120 nuclear weapon strikes? We will poison your rivers, your farmland destroyed, and your people will be sickened by nuclear radiation poisoning. It will be a burden on your Healthcare system

we are peaceful nation ,not going to throw bombs .

 

[MultaniGuy]

Says the country who threatens even Israel with Nuclear bomb. History suggests Pakistan was the one planning for Nuclear strikes in India that is in 1999. Anyway, India need not threaten Pakistan with a Nuclear strike, our conventional capability is enough for that.


You need to read about Nuclear blast radius. It takes a lot more than 120 warheads to destroy entire nation and say wipe out and stuff.

Hahaha, using excuses to confuse people here, do you honestly think India will survive 120 nuclear strikes?

LOL

Republic of India is not as big as you think it is.

 

[GHALIB]

Hahaha, using excuses to confuse people here, do you honestly think India will survive 120 nuclear strikes?

LOL

Republic of India is not as big as you think it is.

inshaallah
we will survive even 1000 nuclear bombs .

 

[MultaniGuy]

inshaallah
we will survive even 1000 nuclear bombs .

No point in talking to you, because you know India will not survive 120 nuclear strikes, which would destroy your civilization.

Now shoo.

Says the country who threatens even Israel with Nuclear bomb. History suggests Pakistan was the one planning for Nuclear strikes in India that is in 1999. Anyway, India need not threaten Pakistan with a Nuclear strike, our conventional capability is enough for that.


You need to read about Nuclear blast radius. It takes a lot more than 120 warheads to destroy entire nation and say wipe out and stuff.

You are being dishonest. Do you honestly think India would survive 120 nuclear strikes? Be a little reasonable here.

 

[Jackdaws]

Another nuclear thread. Yawn.

 

[Soumitra]

do you honestly think India will survive 120 nuclear strikes?

1 Do you honestly think we will not launch our own nukes just after you fire your NASR? Will your country be able to survive our 2nd strike?
2 Do you honestly think that with our advanced satellite capability we dont know where many of your nuclear storage facilities are?
3 Won't our first round of nukes target these facilities along with your command and control structure thus destroying many of the 120 bombs?
4 Do you think that you will be able to fire those remaining bombs in one go? Once you start firing those nukes we will know rest of your nuclear locations and can fire at them.

You have more stockpile than India but is it enough to obliterate 1.3 billion people living in 3.287 million sq km radius?

The best estimates that I have seen is 150 nukes. Since you guys have a tactical nuke policy lets say you have 30 tactical nukes. This leaves 120 nukes

Because of our satellite capabilities we have a fairly good Idea of your nuclear bases. Obviously when we strike we will try to ensure that we eliminate as many nuclear bases as possible. Still I give you benefit of doubt and say that we are only able to destroy 20 strategic nukes in our first round of strikes. This leaves you with 100 nukes.

Cities like Delhi, Mumbai, Hyderabad and Bangalore all have BMD To destroy the city like Delhi or Mumbai you require atleast 3 nukes each. But because of BMDs you will have to fire 5 nukes each on both these cities that is 10 nukes just to destroy two most important cities.

As per 2011 census there are 46 cities with more than 1 million population. Obviously this figure would have grown by now. Even at just 1 nuke per city you will require 50 additional nukes to destroy all cities with over 1 million population. Just do the maths. you do not have enough nukes to destroy us completely. Yes India will be crippled but will rise again,

 

[GHALIB]

1 Do you honestly think we will not launch our own nukes just after you fire your NASR? Will your country be able to survive our 2nd strike?
2 Do you honestly think that with our advanced satellite capability we dont know where many of your nuclear storage facilities are?
3 Won't our first round of nukes target these facilities along with your command and control structure thus destroying many of the 120 bombs?
4 Do you think that you will be able to fire those remaining bombs in one go? Once you start firing those nukes we will know rest of your nuclear locations and can fire at them.

You have more stockpile than India but is it enough to obliterate 1.3 billion people living in 3.287 million sq km radius?

The best estimates that I have seen is 150 nukes. Since you guys have a tactical nuke policy lets say you have 30 tactical nukes. This leaves 120 nukes

Because of our satellite capabilities we have a fairly good Idea of your nuclear bases. Obviously when we strike we will try to ensure that we eliminate as many nuclear bases as possible. Still I give you benefit of doubt and say that we are only able to destroy 20 strategic nukes in our first round of strikes. This leaves you with 100 nukes.

Cities like Delhi, Mumbai, Hyderabad and Bangalore all have BMD To destroy the city like Delhi or Mumbai you require atleast 3 nukes each. But because of BMDs you will have to fire 5 nukes each on both these cities that is 10 nukes just to destroy two most important cities.

As per 2011 census there are 46 cities with more than 1 million population. Obviously this figure would have grown by now. Even at just 1 nuke per city you will require 50 additional nukes to destroy all cities with over 1 million population. Just do the maths. you do not have enough nukes to destroy us completely. Yes India will be crippled but will rise again,

nah , we will sit and see missiles coming .

 

[Ultima Thule]

we are peaceful nation ,not going to throw bombs .

what lie you have @GHALIB

inshaallah
we will survive even 1000 nuclear bombs .

Yeah hyperpower of the universe, GAY HIND @GHALIB

 

[MultaniGuy]

1 Do you honestly think we will not launch our own nukes just after you fire your NASR? Will your country be able to survive our 2nd strike?
2 Do you honestly think that with our advanced satellite capability we dont know where many of your nuclear storage facilities are?
3 Won't our first round of nukes target these facilities along with your command and control structure thus destroying many of the 120 bombs?
4 Do you think that you will be able to fire those remaining bombs in one go? Once you start firing those nukes we will know rest of your nuclear locations and can fire at them.

You have more stockpile than India but is it enough to obliterate 1.3 billion people living in 3.287 million sq km radius?

The best estimates that I have seen is 150 nukes. Since you guys have a tactical nuke policy lets say you have 30 tactical nukes. This leaves 120 nukes

Because of our satellite capabilities we have a fairly good Idea of your nuclear bases. Obviously when we strike we will try to ensure that we eliminate as many nuclear bases as possible. Still I give you benefit of doubt and say that we are only able to destroy 20 strategic nukes in our first round of strikes. This leaves you with 100 nukes.

Cities like Delhi, Mumbai, Hyderabad and Bangalore all have BMD To destroy the city like Delhi or Mumbai you require atleast 3 nukes each. But because of BMDs you will have to fire 5 nukes each on both these cities that is 10 nukes just to destroy two most important cities.

As per 2011 census there are 46 cities with more than 1 million population. Obviously this figure would have grown by now. Even at just 1 nuke per city you will require 50 additional nukes to destroy all cities with over 1 million population. Just do the maths. you do not have enough nukes to destroy us completely. Yes India will be crippled but will rise again,

I never said Pakistan will survive a nuclear standoff with Republic of India.

I just said Indian civilization will be destroyed by 120 nuclear strikes.

My civilization will still survive though.

1 Do you honestly think we will not launch our own nukes just after you fire your NASR? Will your country be able to survive our 2nd strike?
2 Do you honestly think that with our advanced satellite capability we dont know where many of your nuclear storage facilities are?
3 Won't our first round of nukes target these facilities along with your command and control structure thus destroying many of the 120 bombs?
4 Do you think that you will be able to fire those remaining bombs in one go? Once you start firing those nukes we will know rest of your nuclear locations and can fire at them.

You have more stockpile than India but is it enough to obliterate 1.3 billion people living in 3.287 million sq km radius?

The best estimates that I have seen is 150 nukes. Since you guys have a tactical nuke policy lets say you have 30 tactical nukes. This leaves 120 nukes

Because of our satellite capabilities we have a fairly good Idea of your nuclear bases. Obviously when we strike we will try to ensure that we eliminate as many nuclear bases as possible. Still I give you benefit of doubt and say that we are only able to destroy 20 strategic nukes in our first round of strikes. This leaves you with 100 nukes.

Cities like Delhi, Mumbai, Hyderabad and Bangalore all have BMD To destroy the city like Delhi or Mumbai you require atleast 3 nukes each. But because of BMDs you will have to fire 5 nukes each on both these cities that is 10 nukes just to destroy two most important cities.

As per 2011 census there are 46 cities with more than 1 million population. Obviously this figure would have grown by now. Even at just 1 nuke per city you will require 50 additional nukes to destroy all cities with over 1 million population. Just do the maths. you do not have enough nukes to destroy us completely. Yes India will be crippled but will rise again,

No India will never rise again, Your civilization would be destroyed by 120 nuclear strikes.

Do you honestly think India is that big. India just has a lot of people. That's all!

Your rivers poisoned, farmland destroyed, and much of population would be destroyed/seriously ill by nuclear radiation poisoning would be a burden on your healthcare system.

Anyways, live in your fantasy world.

I am convinced India would not survive 120 nuclear strikes.

Not saying Pakistan would survive 100 nuclear strikes either, but hey our civilization will survive, but not yours.

1 Do you honestly think we will not launch our own nukes just after you fire your NASR? Will your country be able to survive our 2nd strike?
2 Do you honestly think that with our advanced satellite capability we dont know where many of your nuclear storage facilities are?
3 Won't our first round of nukes target these facilities along with your command and control structure thus destroying many of the 120 bombs?
4 Do you think that you will be able to fire those remaining bombs in one go? Once you start firing those nukes we will know rest of your nuclear locations and can fire at them.

You have more stockpile than India but is it enough to obliterate 1.3 billion people living in 3.287 million sq km radius?

The best estimates that I have seen is 150 nukes. Since you guys have a tactical nuke policy lets say you have 30 tactical nukes. This leaves 120 nukes

Because of our satellite capabilities we have a fairly good Idea of your nuclear bases. Obviously when we strike we will try to ensure that we eliminate as many nuclear bases as possible. Still I give you benefit of doubt and say that we are only able to destroy 20 strategic nukes in our first round of strikes. This leaves you with 100 nukes.

Cities like Delhi, Mumbai, Hyderabad and Bangalore all have BMD To destroy the city like Delhi or Mumbai you require atleast 3 nukes each. But because of BMDs you will have to fire 5 nukes each on both these cities that is 10 nukes just to destroy two most important cities.

As per 2011 census there are 46 cities with more than 1 million population. Obviously this figure would have grown by now. Even at just 1 nuke per city you will require 50 additional nukes to destroy all cities with over 1 million population. Just do the maths. you do not have enough nukes to destroy us completely. Yes India will be crippled but will rise again,

Hahaha, 120 nuclear bomb strikes on India, is enough to destroy it.

Don't kid yourself or me.

Look what Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuclear strikes did to Japan. It brought Japan down to its knees and destroyed their economy.

And you are saying India will survive 120 nuclear bomb strikes?

1 Do you honestly think we will not launch our own nukes just after you fire your NASR? Will your country be able to survive our 2nd strike?
2 Do you honestly think that with our advanced satellite capability we dont know where many of your nuclear storage facilities are?
3 Won't our first round of nukes target these facilities along with your command and control structure thus destroying many of the 120 bombs?
4 Do you think that you will be able to fire those remaining bombs in one go? Once you start firing those nukes we will know rest of your nuclear locations and can fire at them.

You have more stockpile than India but is it enough to obliterate 1.3 billion people living in 3.287 million sq km radius?

The best estimates that I have seen is 150 nukes. Since you guys have a tactical nuke policy lets say you have 30 tactical nukes. This leaves 120 nukes

Because of our satellite capabilities we have a fairly good Idea of your nuclear bases. Obviously when we strike we will try to ensure that we eliminate as many nuclear bases as possible. Still I give you benefit of doubt and say that we are only able to destroy 20 strategic nukes in our first round of strikes. This leaves you with 100 nukes.

Cities like Delhi, Mumbai, Hyderabad and Bangalore all have BMD To destroy the city like Delhi or Mumbai you require atleast 3 nukes each. But because of BMDs you will have to fire 5 nukes each on both these cities that is 10 nukes just to destroy two most important cities.

As per 2011 census there are 46 cities with more than 1 million population. Obviously this figure would have grown by now. Even at just 1 nuke per city you will require 50 additional nukes to destroy all cities with over 1 million population. Just do the maths. you do not have enough nukes to destroy us completely. Yes India will be crippled but will rise again,

Stop making crap up.

Pakistani nuclear weapons are well hidden. Not even USA knows where they are. lol.

Anyways keep making crap up, I talk with facts.

1 Do you honestly think we will not launch our own nukes just after you fire your NASR? Will your country be able to survive our 2nd strike?
2 Do you honestly think that with our advanced satellite capability we dont know where many of your nuclear storage facilities are?
3 Won't our first round of nukes target these facilities along with your command and control structure thus destroying many of the 120 bombs?
4 Do you think that you will be able to fire those remaining bombs in one go? Once you start firing those nukes we will know rest of your nuclear locations and can fire at them.

You have more stockpile than India but is it enough to obliterate 1.3 billion people living in 3.287 million sq km radius?

The best estimates that I have seen is 150 nukes. Since you guys have a tactical nuke policy lets say you have 30 tactical nukes. This leaves 120 nukes

Because of our satellite capabilities we have a fairly good Idea of your nuclear bases. Obviously when we strike we will try to ensure that we eliminate as many nuclear bases as possible. Still I give you benefit of doubt and say that we are only able to destroy 20 strategic nukes in our first round of strikes. This leaves you with 100 nukes.

Cities like Delhi, Mumbai, Hyderabad and Bangalore all have BMD To destroy the city like Delhi or Mumbai you require atleast 3 nukes each. But because of BMDs you will have to fire 5 nukes each on both these cities that is 10 nukes just to destroy two most important cities.

As per 2011 census there are 46 cities with more than 1 million population. Obviously this figure would have grown by now. Even at just 1 nuke per city you will require 50 additional nukes to destroy all cities with over 1 million population. Just do the maths. you do not have enough nukes to destroy us completely. Yes India will be crippled but will rise again,

You are lying. If India is hit with a couple nuclear bombs like Japan was, yes India would survive.

But 120 nuclear bomb strikes on India? India would never survive that.

 

[Soumitra]

I never said Pakistan will survive a nuclear standoff with Republic of India.

I just said Indian civilization will be destroyed by 120 nuclear strikes.

My civilization will still survive though.


No India will never rise again, Your civilization would be destroyed by 120 nuclear strikes.

Do you honestly think India is that big. India just has a lot of people. That's all!

Your rivers poisoned, farmland destroyed, and much of population would be destroyed/seriously ill by nuclear radiation poisoning would be a burden on your healthcare system.

Anyways, live in your fantasy world.

I am convinced India would not survive 120 nuclear strikes.

Not saying Pakistan would survive 100 nuclear strikes either, but hey our civilization will survive, but not yours.


Hahaha, 120 nuclear bomb strikes on India, is enough to destroy it.

Don't kid yourself or me.

Look what Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuclear strikes did to Japan. It brought Japan down to its knees and destroyed their economy.

And you are saying India will survive 120 nuclear bomb strikes?


Stop making crap up.

Pakistani nuclear weapons are well hidden. Not even USA knows where they are. lol.

Anyways keep making crap up, I talk with facts.


You are lying. If India is hit with a couple nuclear bombs like Japan was, yes India would survive.

But 120 nuclear bomb strikes on India? India would never survive that.

You keep on repeating that "Pakistani Civilization" will survive even after 100 nukes destroy Pakistan? How can civilization survive if country is destroyed?

Civilization is not equal to religion. A nuclear strike on India will also kill 20 million Indian Muslims.

Plus there are millions of hindus living outside India also

 

[MultaniGuy]

You keep on repeating that "Pakistani Civilization" will survive even after 100 nukes destroy Pakistan? How can civilization survive if country is destroyed?

Civilization is not equal to religion. A nuclear strike on India will also kill 20 million Indian Muslims.

Plus there are millions of hindus living outside India also

You ignorant person. I really didn't want to say it, but now I will say it.

Islamic civilization will survive, but Hindu civilization will be destroyed by 120 Pakistani nuclear bombs.

Now go cry me a river.

You keep on repeating that "Pakistani Civilization" will survive even after 100 nukes destroy Pakistan? How can civilization survive if country is destroyed?

Civilization is not equal to religion. A nuclear strike on India will also kill 20 million Indian Muslims.

Plus there are millions of hindus living outside India also

Republic of India and Nepal are your only home worlds where Hinduism is predominates.

Now shoo.

Yes we Pakistanis can destroy your Hindu civilization.

You keep on repeating that "Pakistani Civilization" will survive even after 100 nukes destroy Pakistan? How can civilization survive if country is destroyed?

Civilization is not equal to religion. A nuclear strike on India will also kill 20 million Indian Muslims.

Plus there are millions of hindus living outside India also

You are correct, 200 million Muslims will die in Republic of India, but they are the minority in that country anyways.

You keep on repeating that "Pakistani Civilization" will survive even after 100 nukes destroy Pakistan? How can civilization survive if country is destroyed?

Civilization is not equal to religion. A nuclear strike on India will also kill 20 million Indian Muslims.

Plus there are millions of hindus living outside India also

Oh really millions of Hindus living outside of Republic of India?

Name other Hindu majority countries other than Republic of India and Nepal.

Now get lost.

You keep on repeating that "Pakistani Civilization" will survive even after 100 nukes destroy Pakistan? How can civilization survive if country is destroyed?

Civilization is not equal to religion. A nuclear strike on India will also kill 20 million Indian Muslims.

Plus there are millions of hindus living outside India also

My, my, when did I say "Pakistani civilization", I meant to say "Islamic civilization" will survive.

 

[Placemat]

I think if Pak bombed India with nuke then India will retaliate and not just Pakistan but will also take out Mecca and Medina and much of the Islamic world. If it's confirmed we are going down then surely even China which gave the nuke Pak is in danger.
I think it's inevitable that humans will use nuke to kill each other,it's just that we don't know where when and who.