tallboy123
SENIOR MEMBER
india don't have the balls to break from US and Europe.
TRoll alert...
The troll didn't even take a a time to read the main article...
Should check one own balls before talking about others.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
india don't have the balls to break from US and Europe.
So, in a choice between dictators v/s democracy, India is "non aligned".
Good to know.![]()
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's statement follows India's abstention on a UN Security Council resolution approving the use of force to protect Libyan rebels.
The human desire for more freedom and for citizens to decide their own future is universal.
As a democracy, we are happy to see our brothers in West Asia and North Africa taking an increasing role in determining their own future ... but these are decisions for countries and their citizens to take for themselves, free of outside interference or coercion.
Supporting democracy and supporting the merciless bombardment of dictatorships by so called democracies are two entirely different things.
If India supports democracy, and wishes for China to be a democratic nation, does not mean that India support, encourage and participate in an agenda to forcefully install Democracy in the People's Republic of China no matter whatever are China's internal affairs. Whether they want democracy or not is entirely upto the people of that nation and none of India's personal business. The most we can do is educate or encourage them to go democratic, nobody should force their opinions onto others.
You gotta think straight and think beyond your illogical hatred for India.
As a human, we all condemn these dictators who can kill an rebeleous voice in a blink of an eyelid. But the motive of the attacking nation is not this nobble thought at all. Other-wise they would have been pounding few more countries by now.
Tyrannical regimes abrogate sovereignty when they start bombing their own civilians on a mass scale.
Clearly, there is a distinction between bombing terrorists or criminals, and bombing legitimate protestors. I don't think even the dissenting governments are denying the legitimacy of the pro-democracy movement in Libya.
The Hindu : News / National : No external powers should interfere in Libya affairs: India
Members of the Lok Sabha on Tuesday made a strong pitch for a unanimous resolution in the House condemning air strikes on Libya by the allied forces while the government said it had already expressed unhappiness over the action.
Raising the issue, Samajwadi Party chief Mulayam Singh Yadav suggested that the House should pass a unanimous resolution against the air strike by the US-led forces. The Left parties and the Bharatiya Janata Party supported the proposition.
Supporting the Libyans striving for democracy in the oil-rich nation, Mr Yadav said: ``The Lok Sabha has to condemn the attack on Libya. Innocent civilians have been killed and Parliament cannot keep quiet.
Basudeb Acharia (CPI-M) said the House should condemn the brutal attack on Libya and recalled that the Lok Sabha had deplored the aggression of Iraq by the U.S. He, along with Gurudas Dasgupta (CPI), appreciated the stand taken by the Government on Libya, but said it was not enough.
``In the name of unseating Col Qadhafi, thousands of innocent Libyans are being killed in the NATO bombings. Another Iraq and another Afghanistan is being created, Mr Dasgupta said. We are against Qadhafi but do not believe in NATO bombings. It is a war for oil, he said.
Responding to the concerns expressed by members, Leader of the House Pranab Mukherjee said the government had already expressed its unhappiness over the intervention of allied countries against Libya.
"Nobody, no two or three countries can take a decision to change a particular regime in a third country," Mr. Mukherjee said. "Whether a regime will change or not will depend on the people of that particular country, not by any external forces," he said.
NDA Convenor Sharad Yadav termed the attacks on Libya as a serious matter and wanted India to take a strong position against it. Associating with the views expressed by the members, Mr. Yashwant Sinha (BJP) supported a unanimous resolution of the House condemning the aggression against Libya.
"We are extremely concerned about what is happening in Libya. We are completely with the democratic forces struggling against an authoritarian regime. We are against any military intervention to enforce regime change," Mr Sinha said calling for an immediate ceasefire.
Mehboob Beg (National Conference) appreciated the stand taken by the government and pitched for a middle path to provide relief to the Libyan people. ``America's coercive tactics have been increasing over the years," Sharifuddin Shariq (NC) said.
Ratan Singh Ajnala (SAD) and Dara Singh Chauhan (BSP) said their parties associated with the views expressed by the members, while Raghuvansh Prasad Singh (RJD) said Parliament should not be a mute spectator.
Bandopadhyay (Trinamool Congress), Bhratruhari Mahtab (BJD), Nama Nageshwara Rao (TDP) said a strong message should be sent by the Lok Sabha against the action of the allied forces.
Well sounds like a very liberal view, but tell me what should the International Community have done when China under Mao was responsible for the deaths of between 20-30 million of their citizens? Was the US right in invading Iraq then because afer all Saddam had comitted crimes against his own citizens.