What's new

India frustrated and left isolated in Afghanistan endgame with Pakistan on driving seat:

Indian Lobby always Having successfully isolated the Kashmir issue and treating Afghanistan as stand-alone problem this is excatly what you are trying in your words here and leaving a smell of cow ding. What has somehow been lost in this discussion is the central role of Kashmir. When Obama was still on the campaign trail, he frequently called for a comprehensive regional solution linking Kashmir to problems on the AfPak border. But once in office, things changed. When Richard Holbrooke was appointed special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, it was notable that his brief did not include India or Kashmir. The reason for the change of heart, it turned out, was that India had intensively lobbied Washington to leave Kashmir off Holbrooke's agenda, incensed at the idea of outside interference. India's wishes have been realised: not once did the word "Kashmir" appear in Obama's Afghan strategy speech at the start of December. We as a Pakistani have knowledge that Kashmir remains priority number one for US and the main reason for its reluctance to commit fully support to the US effort in Afghanistan.We learn from west nothing is free so in exchange for participation in a stable political arrangement in Afghanistan, Pakistan has right can extract from the United States a promise to pressure India to negotiate over Kashmir issue which may increase tensions between India and Pakistan over the disputed Kashmir region could flare once US-led foreign troops leave Afghanistan next year. As fears from India grow and he @@@@ in his pants , you can smell right ?the country has decided to deploy 700,000 troops to the Indian Occupied Kashmir (IOK) in a desperate effort to stem worries. We already see Ghandi lost his arms in 2019 The Economist front cover , don't ask a dumb question from us why Ghandi lost his arms , better ask from your western master who want to play new Great Game in South Asia.
Let me ask one simple thing. Who benefits by linking Kashmir to Afghan war?

And certainly India has lobbyists in Washington. Thinking otherwise is like expecting your opponent in race to not run. I will expect them to use every dirty trick in the book or even outside it.

Indians succeeded in undoing your effort in Washington tells they were willing to put more effort into it.

We are also trying to understand why your thinking is tilt more towards cow ding, and asking dumb question pretended have no idea what is cooking in South Asia.
What I fail to see is how a discussion on Afghan should land into Kashmir?
 
What I fail to see is how a discussion on Afghan should land into Kashmir?

Consider it a continuation of some lethal Pakistani strategic manoeuvres

Energizing the Khalistani movement through Karatpur (or whatever its called)
A real sword strike to the gut in Afghanistan
And in Kashmir a gradual breakdown of any indian support
 
Let me ask one simple thing. Who benefits by linking Kashmir to Afghan war?

And certainly India has lobbyists in Washington. Thinking otherwise is like expecting your opponent in race to not run. I will expect them to use every dirty trick in the book or even outside it.

Indians succeeded in undoing your effort in Washington tells they were willing to put more effort into it.


What I fail to see is how a discussion on Afghan should land into Kashmir?
There can be no peace in Afghanistan until these two neighbors sit down and talk about a common approach to both Kabul and Kashmir, rather than negotiating by proxy war.only the United States has the power to enforce a deal.The problem is the Pentagon.
https://www.dawn.com/news/1453289
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom