china is almost linked to all SAARC nations and can benefit us all,SAARC is a group of south asian countries so where is the question of chinese entry? if everybody is offerred the membership than lets US and France to be the members also.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
china is almost linked to all SAARC nations and can benefit us all,SAARC is a group of south asian countries so where is the question of chinese entry? if everybody is offerred the membership than lets US and France to be the members also.
we have to
But again, what exactly is wrong with having China become a member of SAARC, aside from the weak arguments over "South Asia"?What 'benefit'? How come you guys talk of 'benefits'. Should aloo, gobi, mutter be imported to India or not itself is a debate that you can't settle. The economic impact of that will be 100 times greater that anything you get from China entering SAARC, and instead of that you are playing 'grand games'. Chinese must be laughing- ye dekho kaise bawle log hain, instead of going after real 'benifits', they'll do anything to please us.
go cry over your former Indian leaders who agreed to it during the founding of SAARCPakistan is a misfit in SAARC. Pakistan's natural allies are to the North and West. It has nothing or should have nothing to do with South Asia.
No. Tibet is adjacent to South Asia. Not China.But again, what exactly is wrong with having China become a member of SAARC, aside from the weak arguments over "South Asia"?
As the author in the OP pointed out, China is geographically adjacent to existing SAARC nations and therefore her inclusion would not impact geographical continuity in the SAARC economic bloc.

It suited you then. Now it does not suit you. If you are fine with it, I won't have any. I am a nobody here.go cry over your former Indian leaders who agreed to it during the founding of SAARC

we dont really need to take the amount of loan our govt takes,for eg they use the money of metros and unnecessary project,as for what we need is work on education and health sector,for which we dont need to take much loan,then again its PK.I agree u have to but the biggest benefit will be trade with india as people use similar commodities so its way easier and transportation is easier too.
SAARC will work even better and for its name sake benefit the most by including ChinaNo. Tibet is adjacent to South Asia. Not China.![]()
It suited you then. Now it does not suit you. If you are fine with it, I won't have any. I am a nobody here.![]()
SAARC will work even better and for its name sake benefit the most by including China
its not UN security council for goodness sake.
its all about business and progress.
Tibet is considered part of China by the majority of the international community, and even the Dalai Lama has changed his position to now arguing for autonomy for TIbetans as part of China.No. Tibet is adjacent to South Asia. Not China.![]()
![]()
Which is precisely why China is not coming. All SA countries are apprehensive about it(Pakistan is not SA). An economic coalition is a different thing. A SAARC membership means political compromises as well. So...sorry.SAARC will work even better and for its name sake benefit the most by including China
its not UN security council for goodness sake.
its all about business and progress.

we dont really need to take the amount of loan our govt takes,for eg they use the money of metros and unnecessary project,as for what we need is work on education and health sector,for which we dont need to take much loan,then again its PK.
kashmir is also like that.Pakistan is a misfit in SAARC. Pakistan's natural allies are to the North and West. It has nothing or should have nothing to do with South Asia.

unnecessary infrastructure dude,i take work on power sector as positiveWithout infrastructure there will be 0 investment.U r basics are as clear as ur imran khan on this issue.
What exactly are these apprehensions that "all SA countries excluding Pakistan" have about China joining SAARC?Which is precisely why China is not coming. All SA countries are apprehensive about it(Pakistan is not SA). An economic coalition is a different thing. A SAARC membership means political compromises as well. So...sorry.![]()
unnecessary infrastructure dude,i take work on power sector as positive