What's new

India Asserts Its Role in the Indian Ocean

CONNAN

SENIOR MEMBER
Feb 23, 2009
3,381
0
2,923
Country
India
Location
United States
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has concluded a five day tour of three Indian Ocean island nations – Mauritius, Seychelles and Sri Lanka which began on the 11th of March. The tour is widely seen as an attempt by India to reconnect with these countries after years of neglect. It was the first visit by an Indian PM to Sri Lanka in 28 years. This is a direct result of Chinese submarines docking in Colombo in September and November of 2014 which sent alarm bells ringing in the corridors of power in New Delhi and the Indian strategic community about the increasing Chinese presence in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR). The most important of the agreements signed during Modi’s visit are aimed at securing the “development rights” for two islands, Agalega in Mauritius and Assomption in Seychelles.

The Island nations of Sri Lanka, Maldives, Mauritius, Seychelles and Madagascar have always been under Indian influence. The latter three islands– Mauritius, Seychelles, and Madagascar –have substantial Indian-origin populations. Barring Madagascar, India has intervened militarily/covertly in all these countries. There exists an unwritten “Monroe Doctrine” whereby India will not entertain any government that is not pro-India or allow any “external forces” take away its influence in the region.

India’s Military Interventions

In 1983, India almost militarily intervened in Mauritius. “Operation Lal Dora” was approved by the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi for a secret landing of Indian troops in Mauritius. These troops were to help the Mauritian Prime Minister Anerood Jugnauth fight off a challenge from his radical rival Paul Berenger which India feared might take the form of an attempted coup. The plan was aborted in favour of an operation led by India’s external intelligence Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) which was successful.

In June 1986, India under “Operation Flowers are Blooming” deployed INS Vindhyagiri at the Seychelles Port of Victoria to abort a coup attempt against President Rene. India again helped avert another coup in September of 1986 when Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi lent President Rene his plane to fly back to Seychelles from Harare where he was attending an international meeting.

In 1988, under “Operation Cactus”, India swiftly put down a coup attempt by Tamil mercenaries in the Maldives. India landed troops in hours after appeal from the then President of Maldives Mr. Maamoom Abdul Gayoom, which quickly secured all the vital installations in the Maldives. Swift operation by the Indian military and aided by intelligence successfully quelled the attempted coup in the island nation.

Indian intervention in Sri Lanka is well known. Although it was to be a peacekeeping operation, it got involved in battling the LTTE and eventually withdrew. The intervention lasted from nearly three years starting July of 1987. What preceded this and the rise of the Tamil movement with Indian backing was the increasing U.S. attempts to secure a base in Sri Lanka. India was averse to any such decision during the Cold War when it was in the Soviet camp for all practical purpose though it remained non-aligned.

So India has not shied away from undertaking operations in the Indian Ocean Region whenever its interests have been threatened.

China’s Maritime Silk Route Is New String of Pearls Theory

Noted Chinese military leader Zhao Nanqi, back in the 1990s, said: “We can no longer accept the Indian Ocean as an ocean only of the Indians”. Over the last few years, as Chinese economy boomed and China’s military capabilities expanded, Beijing sought to challenge India.

The theory of String of Pearls came into being in which China sought to encircle India through a series of investment in ports around India’s neighbours. China has made ports in Hambantota in Southern Sri Lanka and Gwadar in Balochistan province in Pakistan. Gwadar port assumes more significance as it’s located close to the choke point of Strait of Hormuz and can monitor all shipping that goes through the region including India’s oil shipments. China is also making ports in Bangladesh and Burma. China denied any plans to have military bases in these places but it has not convinced India’s security establishment. China has now embarked on a new project to exercise influence in the Indian Ocean Region by means of “Maritime Silk Route” which is nothing but rehashed String of Pearls. China claims it wants to revive historic trade routes and develop infrastructure that will benefit the nations along the route.

India’s Sphere of Influence

India considers its sphere of influence to extend from the Red Sea in the west to the Strait of Malacca in the east which links the Indian Ocean with the Pacific Ocean. On the western side, India has defence agreement with Oman which includes berthing right for its navy. In 2008 India signed a defence agreement with Qatar which virtually makes India the security guarantor of Qatar. India has extensive defence ties with Singapore with frequent visits by Indian Navy.

India, for most past of the last two decades, pursued a “Look East” policy to increase trade as well as influence with the countries of ASEAN and neglected the islands of the Indian Ocean Region. China stepped in providing a lot of aid and developing infrastructure. These small island countries have nothing against China and were happy to receive whatever they got from China.

India, on the other hand, has not given a lot to these countries partly because India doesn’t have the kind of money that China has. China has attempted to secure military bases in the Indian Ocean. Seychelles and Mauritius are ideal locations for China as a lot of its oil shipments from the Gulf region and its containers containing manufactured goods destined for Europe and America passes the region. Mauritius is close to the US base of Diego Garcia. India has made sure this has not come to pass and the new deal with these two countries effectively shuts the door on Chinese attempts to secure a base.

India already has a monitoring station in northern Madagascar, complete with radars and surveillance gear to intercept maritime communication. India plans to have 32 radar stations installed across Seychelles, Mauritius, the Maldives and Sri Lanka. Prime Minister Modi handed over one such station to Seychelles during his visit. India has also provided surveillance aircraft to Seychelles and Mauritius. Modi, during his visit to Mauritius, commissioned Barracuda Naval Patrol Vessel which is the first warship to be exported by India. More is to follow.

While the countries of ASEAN already look to India to be a security provider for it in the face of increasing Chinese aggression, there has been no such indication from the island nations of the Indian Ocean. As India develops the islands it has secured from Seychelles and Mauritius, it should look to convert these into military bases and develop stronger military relation between India and both these countries. India should look to sign treaties with these countries to handle their defence just like they do for Bhutan. In the past, on the request of Mauritius to send an officer to serve as its national security advisor, India sent General J.N. Tamini. That Mauritius has 68% of its population of Indian descent and Seychelles about 10% will help India pursue the goal of taking over the defence responsibilities of these two countries. The affinity they have towards India was visible with the kind of reception Modi got from them. India can leverage this to create a military alliance.

India’s Need for Overseas Bases

The fear of China from East China Sea to Eastern Africa is genuine and present. China helped rig the elections in Zimbabwe to get the autocratic Robert Mugabe re-elected in 2013. Mugabe has been ruling the country as President since 1987. In Sri Lanka, it backed former President Mahinda Rajapakse. It has got several infrastructure projects at inflated price with a not a lot to gain for the local population and wholeheartedly helped with his campaign to get re-elected. From East Asia to Eastern Africa, the threat of China is there and India, with its growing economic and military power, is looked upon as a source for security and stability.

India should look at having military bases in foreign countries, something it has been shy of. After Singapore became an independent republic in 1965, it asked India to guarantee its security and asked for Indian naval assets to be stationed there. The then Prime Minister of India, Indira Gandhi refused to take any security role in the region. In the 1980s, Zimbabwe had asked the then PM Rajiv Gandhi to station Mig 21s in Zimbabwe and Mozambique. Rajiv Gandhi declined saying he is was not in favour of deploying bases on foreign shores. A look at the US and the way its military operates shows us that strong friends, alliances and bases all over the world is what helps it project power. Having bases in various countries will effectively deter China from meddling the affairs of the host country that may be against the interest of India.

Conclusion

While India develops its naval assets of aircraft carriers, submarines and other surface combatants to project power across the region, it will have to develop a strategic doctrine for the Indian Ocean Region all the way to East China Sea. Having a strong navy is only the means to achieve the strategic objectives. Otherwise it will be like soldiers sent on a mission without any specified objectives.

Indian Ocean is India’s neighbourhood and the security of India depends on the security of the Indian Ocean and the countries that are littoral of it. India has to look to create strong military alliances with these countries to make the ocean truly India’s. We have made a new start with PM Modi’s visits to the Indian Ocean Islands.

(Author Yusuf Unjhawala is Editor, Indian Defence Analysis, an online forum on defence and strategic affairs of India. He comments extensively on defence and geopolitics from his twitter handle @YusufDFI)

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this article are the author's personal opinions. Information, facts or opinions shared by the Author do not reflect the views of Niti Central and Niti Central is not responsible or liable for the same. The Author is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.

India Asserts Its Role in the Indian OceanIndia News Analysis Opinions on Niti Central
 
India should look at having military bases in foreign countries, something it has been shy of. After Singapore became an independent republic in 1965, it asked India to guarantee its security and asked for Indian naval assets to be stationed there. The then Prime Minister of India, Indira Gandhi refused to take any security role in the region. In the 1980s, Zimbabwe had asked the then PM Rajiv Gandhi to station Mig 21s in Zimbabwe and Mozambique. Rajiv Gandhi declined saying he is was not in favour of deploying bases on foreign shores.

Why did India decline Singapore and Zimbabwe in the past ?
 
Why did India decline Singapore and Zimbabwe in the past ?

What ever the reason, it is very unlikely that any nation will be willing to consider having indian bases on their soil unless they feel directly threatened by another country, and are unable to deal with that threat themselves. Singapore was not developed modern city state in 1965 that it is now, and it felt threatened by Malaysia during that time.

Now on the other hand it is a rich nation with relatively strong forces. It also has a strong US presence, similarly these small, no tiny island states have very little threats apart from pirates to worry about so they are unlikely to need foreign military forces on their soil, apart from small detachments to provide training or help against pirates.
 
What ever the reason, it is very unlikely that any nation will be willing to consider having indian bases on their soil unless they feel directly threatened by another country, and are unable to deal with that threat themselves. Singapore was not developed modern city state in 1965 that it is now, and it felt threatened by Malaysia during that time.

Now on the other hand it is a rich nation with relatively strong forces. It also has a strong US presence, similarly these small, no tiny island states have very little threats apart from pirates to worry about so they are unlikely to need foreign military forces on their soil, apart from small detachments to provide training or help against pirates.

Then why does India have a military base in Tajikistan, and now Mauritius and Seychelles ?
Even Oman and Qatar offered India a military base in 2008.
 
I always wondered, when China was offered bases, or had intentions, the Chinese netizens were always against it on the bases of too expensive, which obviously influenced decision.

After thinking about it, India really have no frames of reference to what well off is, Bangladesh, and Pakistan are both poorer and even tries to go into India.

While China has rich neighbors like Japan, Korea, Hong kong and Singapore, which puts the government into a very awkward situation, where any funds used for external purposes is going to make the government look bad, when there are still plenty of people not well off.
 
Last edited:
Then why does India have a military base in Tajikistan, and now Mauritius and Seychelles ?
Even Oman and Qatar offered India a military base in 2008.

There are no indian military bases outside india. Please provide detailed proof of indian soldiers based on foreign soil, apart from those working for the UN.

The only nations that have foreign military bases are the US, UK, Australia and France. India has an agreement to help develop, island for commercial development in Mauritius and Seychelles, there are no agreement that allow india to base any form of military detachments there.

Show me a official report that says that india has any right to base any military or strategic on any of those islands.
 
Last edited:
There are no indian military bases outside india. Please provide detailed proof of indian soldiers based on foreign soil, apart from those working for the UN.

There might be soldiers in ragtag uniform not using the toilet when they should. So that is taken as evidence of Indian soldiers stationed abroad.
 
There might be soldiers in ragtag uniform not using the toilet when they should. So that is taken as evidence of Indian soldiers stationed abroad.

Or if we see them eating bugs we can say with certainty they are chinese.
 
Last edited:
Then why does India have a military base in Tajikistan, and now Mauritius and Seychelles ?
Even Oman and Qatar offered India a military base in 2008.

Tajikistan? I take it your taking about the airbase that india was suppose to have helped build? How many indian fighters are based there? None. Have the Tajik government agreed to allow india to use the base? No.
 
Tajikistan? I take it your taking about the airbase that india was suppose to have helped build? How many indian fighters are based there? None. Have the Tajik government agreed to allow india to use the base? No.

Well, you need to forgive the Indians. Their press make rumors as facts to trump up India.
 
Why did India decline Singapore and Zimbabwe in the past ?

with two active enemies in that period of time and recent war with china in the 60's prevented India from having foreign bases and we are not economically strong if you remember in the 60's and 70's we were depending on USSR soft loans and in a dire economic situation with constant wars with Pakistan and one with china
 
There might be soldiers in ragtag uniform not using the toilet when they should. So that is taken as evidence of Indian soldiers stationed abroad.

@waz could you tell this 50 cent chinese troll it is not a must to troll on ALL india defence threads and he could do us a favor if he agreed to spare two threads daily and in return indians will pretend he is a white american. Its a fair deal.
 
Tajikistan? I take it your taking about the airbase that india was suppose to have helped build? How many indian fighters are based there? None. Have the Tajik government agreed to allow india to use the base? No.


India’s Ayni military base in Tajikistan is Russia-locked | Russia & India Report

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/HH12Df01.html

Ayni air base hosts Indian radar and Mi -17 helos and 12 Mig 29 fighters under joint command of India and Russia.
Moreover there having ongoing talks between India and Russia about stationing IAF's Mig 29s there permanently.

Glad to be able to help educate you.Next time do your own research before opening your trap.

kthnxbai.
 
India’s Ayni military base in Tajikistan is Russia-locked | Russia & India Report

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/HH12Df01.html

Ayni air base hosts Indian radar and Mi -17 helos and 12 Mig 29 fighters under joint command of India and Russia.
Moreover there having ongoing talks between India and Russia about stationing IAF's Mig 29s there permanently.

Glad to be able to help educate you.Next time do your own research before opening your trap.

kthnxbai.

Before you open your trap and advice people about doing their research, you should try doing some yourself dumbass. The Tajik government officially rejected any deployment or use by indian airforce of Ayni base, it is currently used jointly by the Russian and Tajiks.

The site that india (RAW) originally part funded to supply the Afghan Northern Alliance is called Farkhor not Ayni and india wanted to station a dozen mig 29s there, to protect their operations which was not agreed to by the Tajiks. RAW limited their involvement in support of the NA when US got directly involved, and there was no need to supply the NA via Tajikistan. Now do your research and STFU.
 
Last edited:
Before you open your trap and advice people about doing their research, you should try doing some yourself dumbass. The Tajik government officially rejected any deployment or use by indian airforce of Ayni base, it is currently used jointly by the Russian and Tajiks.

The site that india (RAW) originally part funded to supply the Afghan Northern Alliance is called Farkhor not Ayni and india wanted to station a dozen mig 29s there, to protect their operations which was not agreed to by the Tajiks. RAW limited their involvement in support of the NA when US got directly involved, and there was no need to supply the NA via Tajikistan. Now do your research and STFU.

Listen you angry nerd I provided two links to backup what I claimed- That India has in fact a base Tajikistan.

Feel free keep spouting verbal diarrhoea from your keyboard, I am not in the business of entertaining fools.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom