If the onus to establish the fact doesn't lies, your argument is nothing but a rant.
If the premise itself is discriminatory, which it is based on no facts, then talking of general bias is actually off topic.
For e.g. If someone start a thread saying the American school shootout is because of pakistan, one shall not continue talk about general terrorism in pakistan. Right?
Or you are just venting out your frustration on ICC based out of prejudice (which may be true)?
However, is ICC biased in this case? I dont think so considering the opponent, conditions and importance of innings played by individuals. Lets talk a bit on topic as well.
But the topic is the reward system in all cases. Which has been discriminatory based on the ICC's own perception of the opponent, conditions and innings.

