acetophenol
SENIOR MEMBER
Huge difference between the NAL Hansa and the Ab-Initio trainer of airforce. Please stop comparing both civilian and military equipment.
I don't know much about it. Can you tell the differences please?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Huge difference between the NAL Hansa and the Ab-Initio trainer of airforce. Please stop comparing both civilian and military equipment.
Nothing more than pathetic ranting, whining and![]()
![]()
How exactly have i twisted the title ???...removing your Indian goggles may help.!!
Did i say, the rookies will be fighting your war.... when nothing to add, digression is habitual for you Indians.!!


I don't know much about it. Can you tell the differences please?
Rookie could be fighting our future wars.
Dont think cutting flying hours help
i dont think its cost related thankfully ($42 billion next years defense budget) phew big nos
Are u that lame or just faking it??????????
The real thread title says:
"Shortage of trainer aircraft, so IAF cuts flying time of rookie pilots to one-third"
You have changed it to:
"Shortage of trainer aircraft, so IAF cuts flying time of rookie pilots to one-third"
And added a new word:
"down" which was not there in the real title of the news.
Hence its proved beyond doubts that you have faked and twisted thread title and violated the rules of this forum.![]()
And you should appreciate my manners and upbringing that i am not responding to you personal attacks and racist attack about Indian.![]()
Neither....but i can see that you need help. !!
Allow me to spoon feed......the very first line in the article reads...Indian Air Force has cut down flying time.
Now, if you are unable to comprehend, then by all means come back for more enlightenment.
And your manners are something indeed to be desired since instead of focusing on the subject, you have decided to go on a wild Goose chase.


First of all a civilian equipment dosent require ADA programming or any defence specific programming in software.
The components are also developed especially for military grade for more ruggedness and reliability
The Defence grade equipments are more simpler in construction and are made sure they work even in the failure of another compnent. Error control is higher)
And the whole cockpit is designed to fly a fighter aircraft and making the rookie pilot to get used the the fighter cockpit since the first day unlike the civilian aircraft cockpit.
There are a lot of differences which cant be listed down here...even though they are used for the same purpose the work is different.
even civilian aircraft also coded in the ADA.That does not depend on the type aircraft but cmponent criticality.they r divided into 5 levels.A is highest.failure of A level components wil cause catastrophic results.A,B,C level components should be coded in ADA.For level D and E C-language can be used.
I think the point is very simple...your heading gives an impression that flying time of entire IAF pilots have been reduced which is not the case...
Anyhow it doesn't matter if this is a short term measure(which i believe is the case)...Though i sincerely hope all those mother fu**ers who are responsible for this mess should be hanged in public..![]()
Thanks for pointing that out ...... we had some healthy discussions/debates, I assure you that wasn't intentional.
The HPT has been a headache for the IAF for some times now.....fitting them with salvage chutes seemed a bit far fetched.
Did i read some where that IAF was looking into the PC-7 . ??