What's new

I suppose this makes it definitive....

They are no Aboriginals, Austrolids as ethnic group. Dravidian is language family.



Ask the Middle Easterners if they consider Pakistanis similar to them. Odds are they look down upon you as a confused Hindoo.

We are not talking about "Eating food". We are talking about what food you prepare at home.

As far as importance of the language I would not expect you to know. If you had known you have forseen the events of 1971

Blacks in America are not African by any means. I would not confuse them. Neither would most African Americans. May be you do.

It is really cringey sad seeing Pakistanis suck up to Arabs and Iranians.

I mean I cringe racially and feel sad as a desi.

Cheers, Doc
 
if you were similar like Europeans you would be forming an economic & cultural union similar to the EU



Once the fighting and discourse in the Middle East stops then we may very well form an economic union with some Middle Eastern nations. By that logic the fact that we havn't created a union with india/South Asia akin to the EU means he also have 0 simialrity to india and South Asia.
 
Once the fighting and discourse in the Middle East stops then we may very well do. By that logic the fact that we havn't created a union with india/South Asia akin to the EU means he also have 0 simialrity to india and South Asia.

you are not even a part of Arab League or GCC or even any remotely functional regional grouping
 
Its just the opposite.

Pakistanis making fun of OUR Muslims as low caste converts.

As if all of them directly sprang from Arab, Persian and Turk loins.

One cannot miss that not so subtle subcontinental Muslim casteism on this very forum.

Cheers, Doc

If there are any who do that against Indian Muslims then that is not funny either imo. There is certainly a strong bias against dark skin in Pakistan, no denying that, and only a negligible percentage of the population will have Arab or Turk ancestry, Iranic/Iranian/Persian (take your pick) more of course based on the fact that the western half of our country is inhabited by Iranic peoples and geographically speaking they (wider iranic world) are our neighbours. This of course is an ancient trend and not something that happened post Islam a prime example being the Kambojas and their mixed heritage.
However as I think this study shows as well, our genetic link with Central Asia and beyond links back to a very old migration which continued into Northern India and ended around Bangladesh/Assam.
 
Last edited:
if you were similar like Europeans you would be forming an economic & cultural union similar to the EU
And if we were similar to you we would be forming a union with you - but hey wait a minute we had one made by British called the Raj and we busted it.

They are no Aboriginals, Austrolids as ethnic group. Dravidian is language family.
And what do you think Pakhtun, Punjabi, Baloch, Sindhi, Kashmiri are? You got it language families.

And what are these Indians called? What bloodline are they?

Munda%2BTribes.jpg


Munda, any of several more or less distinct tribal groups inhabiting a broad belt in central and eastern India and speaking various Munda languages of the Austroasiatic stock. They numbered approximately 9,000,000 in the late 20th century. In the Chota Nāgpur Plateau in southern Bihār, adjacent parts of West Bengal and Madhya Pradesh, and the hill districts of Orissa, they form a numerically important part of the population.


https://www.britannica.com/topic/Munda-people

@PAKISTANFOREVER I tell you though. This report is like kick in the nuts for the Ganga/Dravid Army. In particular the latter who in their earnestness to worship British India make it look like the Dravid from Chennai, the banana on the leaf eater from Odisha, to swamp Bengali is same as Sikh and thereby same as all of Pakistan despite it being obvious like hell to anybody who is not blind. The features, height, and pigmentation varies.

Reports like these will explode the myth these guys have built up.
 
Last edited:
And if we were similar to you we would be forming a union with you - but hey wait a minute we had one made by British called the Raj and we busted it.

And what do you think Pakhtun, Punjabi, Baloch, Sindhi, Kashmiri are? You got it language families.

And what are these Indians called? What bloodline are they?

Munda%2BTribes.jpg


Munda, any of several more or less distinct tribal groups inhabiting a broad belt in central and eastern India and speaking various Munda languages of the Austroasiatic stock. They numbered approximately 9,000,000 in the late 20th century. In the Chota Nāgpur Plateau in southern Bihār, adjacent parts of West Bengal and Madhya Pradesh, and the hill districts of Orissa, they form a numerically important part of the population.


https://www.britannica.com/topic/Munda-people

Nice try at deception. the photo belongs to Andaman & Nicobar Jarawa tribe. There are mighy 400 of them

It was in 1998 when Saudi Arabia gave us free oil after the sanctions due to our nuclear tests and wrote off our debts to them.............:azn:
The Saudi royal family do not do that for all OIC members. They do it for their lap dogs
 
What the hell is wrong with you? You would even deny Mundas Austrolids existed after you had eaten one. There are at least 60 million [1/3 of Pakistan] Austros in India. Here is another link. Read it.


https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=766hDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA71&lpg=PA71&dq=munda+people&source=bl&ots=m4xg5PbFp8&sig=FH74CsFEg9zQYFoJJefJiKw4thU&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiz86vc-ODVAhXpDMAKHdWvCTA4ChDoAQgzMAI#v=onepage&q=munda people&f=false

photo you posted belong to the Jarawa tribe of Andaman & Nicobar islands. there are 400 of them

you posted the photo and you asked the question
" And what are these Indians called? What bloodline are they?"
 
Nice try at deception. the photo belongs to Andaman & Nicobar Jarawa tribe. There are mighy 400 of them


The Saudi royal family do not do that for all OIC members. They do it for their lap dogs


So says the person who's race and ancestors have been conquered, enslaved, humiliated and raped by various empires for over a 1000 years...............:lol:
 
So says the person who's race and ancestors have been conquered, enslaved, humiliated and raped by various empires for over a 1000 years...............:lol:
You do know that they were your ancestors as well who were raped, humiliated, enslaved and conquered by the foreign invaders, or you believe yourself to be a white race who actually invaded and looted the subcontinent. Stockholm syndrome.
 
And if we were similar to you we would be forming a union with you - but hey wait a minute we had one made by British called the Raj and we busted it.

And what do you think Pakhtun, Punjabi, Baloch, Sindhi, Kashmiri are? You got it language families.

And what are these Indians called? What bloodline are they?

Munda%2BTribes.jpg


Munda, any of several more or less distinct tribal groups inhabiting a broad belt in central and eastern India and speaking various Munda languages of the Austroasiatic stock. They numbered approximately 9,000,000 in the late 20th century. In the Chota Nāgpur Plateau in southern Bihār, adjacent parts of West Bengal and Madhya Pradesh, and the hill districts of Orissa, they form a numerically important part of the population.


https://www.britannica.com/topic/Munda-people

@PAKISTANFOREVER I tell you though. This report is like kick in the nuts for the Ganga/Dravid Army. In particular the latter who in their earnestness to worship British India make it look like the Dravid from Chennai, the banana on the leaf eater from Odisha, to swamp Bengali is same as Sikh and thereby same as all of Pakistan despite it being obvious like hell to anybody who is not blind. The features, height, and pigmentation varies.

Reports like these will explode the myth these guys have built up.


Bro, not just for indians but for some Pakistanis too..............:lol:

The article in the OP is IRREFUTABLE scientific evidence that explains the reality as to why Pakistanis look so different to indians and other South Asians. That Pakistanis share the most with Middle Eastern/Central Asian peoples (especially with Iranians) than with anyone else on the planet. It completely destroys the indian narrative, myths and propaganda. There never was a "greater india" and we were never really part of anything East of us. Neither were the IVC or Harappa.

The scientific facts tally up and justify the beliefs of Pakistani nationalists. It also is proof that ultimately, both Pakistan and bangladesh had to be created. No amount of propaganda could ever stop that.

You do know that they were your ancestors as well who were raped, humiliated, enslaved and conquered by the foreign invaders, or you believe yourself to be a white race who actually invaded and looted the subcontinent. Stockholm syndrome.


As the scientific facts and evidence of the OP points out, our ancestry is different to that of modern day indians and is more related to and in line with the "invaders" than to anyone else.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom