How would subcontinent look like if there was only Islam and Urdu?

[Arulmozhi Varman]

Huh, what?

Honor killing is against Islamic teachings. Muslims condemn honor killings. Stop feeding on stereotypes.

By the way Ahmadis are not Muslims. So what is your point.

Killings are against any religion teachings. So what? Has it stopped people from killing each other. Irrespective of religion people find ways and reason to kill each other. Islam or Hindu doesnt matter.

 

[Mamluk]

Killings are against any religion teachings. So what? Has it stopped people from killing each other. Irrespective of religion people find ways and reason to kill each other. Islam or Hindu doesnt matter.

Things like Sati and honor killing have Hindu origin. Some South Asian Muslims continue to practice pre-Islamic stuff.

 

[PakSarzameen5823]

Hey bro we ghilzai/khilji are more badass then the Durranis, a mention would have been nice, after all we put the rajputs to the sword.

Salamu Alaikum

I mentioned the Durranis since someone else brought them up. No doubt the Khilijis and Ghaurids are also worth a mention.

Also, brother, we shouldn't speak badly about Rajputs. Many of them are now Pakistani, and during the Islamic rule of the region they (along with other warrior Hindu tribes like the Kambojas Jats and Gujjars) converted to Islam and played a pretty major role, setting up multiple dynasties (e.g the Samma and Gujarat Sultanates), becoming part of the aristocracy (e.g many of the Mughals had Rajput ancestry) and forming a significant portion of the soldiers who would defend Dar-ul-Islam.

 

[Arulmozhi Varman]

Things like Sati and honor killing have Hindu origin. Some South Asian Muslims continue to practice pre-Islamic stuff.

Lol. The same Hindus in South, Central, East never practised Sati. It was a practise exclusive in the areas of Rajasthan, some parts of Sindh, Gujarat etc. So how come its "Hindu" practise?

 

[PakSarzameen5823]

Lol. The same Hindus in South, Central, East never practised Sati. It was a practise exclusive in the areas of Rajasthan, some parts of Sindh, Gujarat etc. So how come its "Hindu" practise?

Because it was historically practised by Hindus. What part of this is hard for you to mentally grasp?

 

[Arulmozhi Varman]

Because it was historically practised by Hindus. What part of this is hard for you to mentally grasp?

Like killing non muslims historically practised by Muslims and new converts in Pakistan openly followed Arabic cultures?

 

[PakSarzameen5823]

Like killing non muslims historically practised by Muslims

No, we killed those we were at war with. Deviant Muslims who rebelled against Islamic authority at the time experienced the same treatment.

and new converts in Pakistan openly followed Arabic cultures?

Our culture is not Arab. It has Arab (as well as Persian, Turkic and even Afghan because of our Pashtun and Balochi kinsmen) influence, but that does not make it Arab. This influence only exists because during Islamic rule over the region, plenty of Muslims from places such as the Arab world came to Pakistan. My previous posts on this thread (and others) even provide genetic studies that show Muslims from Pakistan and north-west India have minor amounts of SW Asian (Arab) ancestry that is not present among Hindus who inhabit the same region.