What's new

How the 'Five Eyes' cooked up the campaign to kill Huawei

Should Pakistan support China in a PLA armored thrust into US bases in Afghanistan?


  • Total voters
    9

Feng Leng

BANNED
Aug 3, 2017
4,350
-21
10,670
Country
China
Location
China
How the 'Five Eyes' cooked up the campaign to kill Huawei

It was a warm evening this past July when Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau shared a drink with the world’s most powerful intelligence network.

Spy chiefs from the Five Eyes nations had come to a secure resort in coastal Nova Scotia for an informal evening after intense talks in nearby Ottawa.

Trudeau, who’d spent part of the day pledging to fix a “death trap” highway in the Atlantic province, dropped in on the gathering to share some thoughts about geopolitical threats.

When he left, as the lobster dinner was being served, the conversation returned to a debate that began well before this annual meeting and would run long after it: should the agencies go public with their concerns about China?

In the months that followed that July 17 dinner, an unprecedented campaign has been waged by those present – Australia, the US, Canada, New Zealand and the UK – to block Chinese tech giant Huawei from supplying equipment for their next-generation wireless networks.

This increasingly muscular posture towards Beijing culminated in last week’s arrest of Huawei’s chief financial officer, Meng Wanzhou, in Vancouver, over alleged breaches of US sanctions with Iran. Meng, the daughter of the Huawei’s founder Ren Zhengfei, was granted bail on Wednesday ahead of efforts to extradite her to the US.

As the spy bosses sat down to savour Nova Scotia’s famous lobster that evening with a glass of local wine, their recent clash with Russia was seen as a template for the power of working collectively. The British delegation led by MI6 boss Alex Younger – a man who signs official documents in green ink with a single letter “C” – had detailed evidence of the brazen attacks in Salisbury, where Moscow had used a military-grade chemical weapon on UK soil.

Since that July meeting there has been a series of rare public speeches by intelligence chiefs and a coordinated effort on banning Huawei from 5G networks. It began with one of Malcolm Turnbull’s last acts as Prime Minister.

The Sunday before he was deposed Turnbull rang the US President Donald Trump to tell him of Australia’s decision to exclude Huawei and China’s second largest telecommunications equipment maker ZTE from the 5G rollout.

Australia’s statement on the rules it would apply to building next-generation wireless networks was released on August 23 and largely lost in the leadership maelstrom.

Huawei was not named but it ruled out equipment being supplied by “vendors who are likely to be subject to extrajudicial directions from a foreign government”.

Mike Burgess put Huawei back on the national agenda when on October 29 he became the first Director-General of the Australian Signals Directorate to make a public speech in the organisation’s 70 year history.

Listening attentively from the head table that night was the Director-General of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Duncan Lewis and his counterpart at the Australian Secret Intelligence Service, Paul Symon.

All three men were at the meetings in Canada. Again, Burgess never named Huawei or ZTE but said the stakes with 5G “could not be higher” as it “will underpin the communications that Australians rely on every day.”

The man who runs an agency that unlocks electronic secrets had a poacher’s view of the threat: “Offence informs defence and defence informs offence. Or to put it another way, to catch a thief, you will need to think like one (or perhaps, be one).”

Since then he has given a TV interview and opened a Twitter account with a lively first post; “Hi internet, ASD here. Long time listener, first time caller.”

Burgess has even dabbled in some light trolling of Huawei. On November 21 when a Huawei executive boasted of successfully separating the core and access parts of a 5G network in New Zealand he tagged the ASD boss on his post.

To the surprise of most Burgess replied; “Thanks for sharing. In my business I’ve never seen anything “fully isolated...”.

Seven days later New Zealand banned Huawei from supplying 5G equipment to mobile phone company Spark.

Then on December 6, the head of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, David Vigneault, who had hosted the annual Five Eyes gathering, used his first ever public speech to warn of an emerging threat.

“CSIS has seen a trend of state-sponsored espionage in fields that are crucial to Canada’s ability to build and sustain a prosperous, knowledge-based economy,” he said.

“I’m talking about areas such as AI [artificial intelligence], quantum technology, 5G, biopharma and clean tech. In other words, the foundation of Canada’s future growth.”

No one was in any doubt he was talking about China. A formal ban on Huawei and ZTE from Ottawa is expected within weeks.

A day after the Canadian spy boss spoke, the head of MI6 was on his feet at his old Scottish university, St Andrews.

In a speech described as “rare” he warned that “much of the evolving state threat is about our opponents’ increasingly innovative exploitation of modern technology”.

The United Kingdom posed a particular problem for the Five Eyes as, 15 years earlier, British Telecom had struck a partnership with Huawei and that example was routinely used to counter arguments it posed a threat.

In answer to a question Younger took direct aim at Britain’s Huawei problem.

“We need to decide the extent to which we are going to be comfortable with Chinese ownership of these technologies and these platforms in an environment where some of our allies have taken a very definite position,” he said.

On the same day the BT Group announced it was stripping Huawei's equipment out of the core of its existing 3G and 4G mobile operations and would not use its technology in the 5G network.


But no country has been more aggressive than the United States, represented at the Canadian meetings by Gina Haspel.

The newly appointed director of the Central Intelligence Agency was battle hardened by a life spent in the shadows. She shed some light on that in a bruising Senate confirmation hearing in May saying she had “excelled in finding and acquiring secret information that I obtained in brush passes, dead drops, or in meetings in dusty alleys of third world capitals.”

Well before her arrival at the helm of the CIA, the US has been focused on Beijing and the proceedings against Huawei’s Meng are just one front in its efforts to bring China to heel.

“Operation Cloud Hopper”, which is believed to have penetrated networks across the globe, including Australia.

In addition the White House used its bi-annual report on China, last month to say Beijing had "fundamentally" failed to change its behaviour around cyber espionage giving it unfair access to intellectual property, trade secrets, negotiating positions and the internal communications of business.

The report added weight to revelations in The Age and Sydney Morning Herald the same week that China had diverted internet traffic heading to Sydney and its peak security agency had overseen a surge in attacks on Australian companies.

This industrial scale cyber theft is just part of a form guide which convinced the Five Eyes intelligence chiefs that Beijing would not hesitate to recruit Huawei to its cause and the company would have no choice but to comply.

All the evidence before the spy bosses at the dinner in Canada pointed to a rising superpower mounting the most comprehensive campaign of espionage and foreign interference that any had witnessed.

The Party was aggressively exporting a worldview that was hostile to democracy and actively sought to undermine it.

A new Great Game was afoot and the West had been slow to act. But it is acting now.

Operation hang up on Huawei: how it happened
  • February 24 - Malcolm Turnbull lobbied US spy agencies to ban Huawei and ZTE from Australian 5G network
  • August 19 - Turnbull rings US President Donald Trump and tells him of the Huawei, ZTE ban
  • August 23 - Australia announces Huawei, ZTE ban
  • August 24 - Turnbull dumped as Prime Minister
  • October 29 - Mike Burgess explains decision to ban “high risk vendors” from 5G, cites risks to critical infrastructure
  • November 21 - White House slams China for increasingly frequent cyber attacks
  • November 27 - New Zealand bans Huawei citing “significant network security risk”
  • December 1 - Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou arrested in Vancouver
  • December 7 - British Telecom says it will strip Huawei equipment out of its 3G and 4G networks and will not use in 5G

Time for China's operation "Gouge out the Five Eyes" using a combination of assassinations, armored thrust into Afghanistan, submarine attacks on enemy ships in international waters and tactical nuclear strikes on soft targets.
 
Last edited:
lol.


China has a large enough market that Huawei can prosper.
Even then most of the rest of the world, including EU allow Huawei to operate.

China can just ban Apple from it's domestic market as retaliation.
 
Australia, US, Canada, New Zealand and UK VS China
177528.jpg

China is only a developing country,Why do they do this to us :D




Should Pakistan support China in a PLA armored thrust into US bases in Afghanistan?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't ask such questions. It has nothing to do with Pakistan and Afghanistan.
 
Last edited:
Is there such a plan? Can you share more details?

Should Pakistan support China in a PLA armored thrust into US bases in Afghanistan?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't ask such questions. It has nothing to do with Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Do you understand?
 
Even then most of the rest of the world, including EU allow Huawei to operate.

Don't be so sure on EU.

Trump’s war on Huawei splits Europe
In the new Cold War, Europe is being asked to take sides over China.

By LAURENS CERULUS

12/13/18, 7:00 AM CET


Updated 12/14/18, 1:15 PM CET

GettyImages-1053677180-1160x773.jpg

A Huawei poster is displayed outside an Apple store in Shanghai | STR/AFP/Getty Images

The Trump administration's global campaign against telecom giant Huawei is pitting Europe against itself over China.

In the midst of a ballooning U.S.-China trade conflict, Washington has spent the past few months pressing its EU allies via its ambassadors to take a stronger stance against Chinese telecom vendors such as Huawei and ZTE.

The American push, which continued Wednesday with public accusations by U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, is exposing fault-lines between U.S. allies in Europe as well as the so-called "Five Eyes" intelligence community — which have largely followed the U.S. lead — and others that resist the American pressure by stopping short of calling out Chinese tech.

It's another Cold War — this time over information technology.

In the first group there is the United Kingdom, which pushed Huawei to open up its products for constant government audits, and to a lesser extent allied countries like Belgium that are considering steps against Chinese vendors. Even the European Commission, which usually avoids stepping on national capitals' toes over security, waded into the debate last week when a top official declared that the EU "should be worried" about firms like Huawei.

Up until now, no intelligence service has published clear evidence that Huawei inserted "backdoors" for Chinese authorities to access the data that passes through its networks.

On the other side there is Germany, which wants proof from the United States that Huawei poses a security risk, as well as France, Portugal and a slew of central and eastern EU nations.

The increasingly divergent attitudes show how Donald Trump is forcing allies to take sides in a global dispute and measure their economic interests — often deeply embedded with the Chinese vendors — against the value of a security alliance with Washington.


"The message of the U.S. [on Chinese tech] is targeted in part at European governments," said Paul Triolo, head of the "geo-technology" practice at think tank Eurasia Group.

Part of that message has to do with pointing a finger at China. Pompeo did that on Wednesday when he accused the Chinese government of hacking the Marriotthotel chain and stealing the information of up to 500 million people. Top U.S. intelligence officials also testified to senators Wednesday that they sense an "awakening" among allies regarding how they deal with Chinese tech vendors.

"As we shift into 5G, it is important to communicate the risk," Christopher Krebs, a high-ranking cybersecurity official at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, told senators.

The U.S. diplomatic campaign has so far managed to convince counterparts in Canada, Australia, Japan and New Zealand to restrict Huawei.

The United States' Five Eyes partners — the U.K., Canada, Australia and New Zealand — "have an increasing common understanding of these risks," Krebs said, adding that Washington is reaching out to other international allies on this as well.

Up until now, no intelligence service has published clear evidence that Huawei inserted "backdoors" for Chinese authorities to access the data that passes through its networks. Huawei itself vehemently denies it has ever helped any intelligence service with espionage requests. “We categorically reject any allegation that we might pose a security threat,” it said in a statement last week.

But the company faces long-standing suspicions that it's too close to Beijing's intelligence services — concerns that stem from U.S. and U.K. government reports. Fueling such worries is the opaqueness of the company's ownership structure. The company, which is privately held, was founded in 1987 by Ren Zhengfei, a former Chinese military officer, leading some to conclude that it has retained ties with the government.

The discussion over its position in Europe fits into a broader geopolitical shift, as Europe seeks ways to keep control over its technologies and industries under the banner of “strategic autonomy.” The Continent is also trying to relieve pressure on its once-dominant telecom equipment champions Ericsson and Nokia, which are feeling the heat from their Chinese competitors around the globe.

The U.S. diplomatic campaign has so far managed to convince counterparts in Canada, Australia, Japan and New Zealand to restrict Huawei.

The beef worsened last week when Canadian authorities arrested Huawei’s chief financial officer, Sabrina Meng, at the request of U.S. authorities.

They were set to ramp up the pressure in a coordinated release of indictments and statements this week slamming Beijing for continued aggression in cyberspace and for violating a 2015 agreement on cyber espionage activities, the Washington Post reported.

Pressure on EU governments is rising by the week for more public criticism of Huawei.

These moves add fuel to an escalating trade war between the United States and China. Trump previously used such judicial procedures as bargaining chips in his feud with Chinese counterparts over trade barriers and market access, and suggested Wednesday he could do the same with the Huawei case.

The U.S. indictments are aimed at sending a message to the European Union, analysts said.

“Huawei has a large market share,” a senior European diplomat said who asked not to be named due to the issue's sensitivity. “Some Europeans haven’t seen a reason to change that. But the U.S. is more geo-politically driven.”

Germany resists
Overall, Europe's response to concerns about Huawei has been: Show us proof, then we’ll consider the actions.

In critical markets such as Germany, France and the United Kingdom, authorities have charged security agencies with verifying telecom equipment. In the U.K., Huawei has a longstanding deal with the intelligence agency GCHQ to have its equipment audited at a center called "the Cell," in Banbury, a provincial town in southeast England, where cybersecurity experts check its code for backdoors.

But pressure on EU governments is rising by the week for more public criticism of Huawei.

Alex Younger, the U.K.’s foreign intelligence chief, issued a public warning when he told an audience at St Andrews University: "We need to decide the extent to which we are going to be comfortable with Chinese ownership of these technologies and these platforms in an environment where some of our allies have taken a quite definite position.” The U.K.’s main telecom operator BT also decided to phase out Huawei equipment from its core network, the Financial Times reported earlier this month.

At the EU level, officials are scrambling to come up with a policy response. An internal paper obtained by POLITICO previously showed the European Commission recognized the risks associated with giving foreign vendors control over telecom networks. The Commission also commissioned a study on “cyber-enabled theft of intellectual property” that references the same hacker groups targeted by the expected U.S. statements this week.

GettyImages-512195274-714x488.jpg

Germany's biggest telecoms companies said they would continue to work with Huawei | Oliver Berg/AFP via Getty Images

Belgium's Centre for Cybersecurity, which reports to Prime Minister Charles Michel, is advising the government about risks related to Huawei. It said it had “recently requested studies through national and international channels that [would] show that the use of Huawei technology comes with risk,” according to Miguel De Bruycker, head of the cybersecurity agency.

If Europe decides to side with the U.S. on Huawei, Germany would be the tipping point.

But Germany asserts that its security checks are sufficient and allows telecom operators to choose their vendors. The country's biggest telecom companies said this week they would continue to work with Huawei to roll out fifth-generation, or 5G, networks.

“Considering the near-term needs for extension and investment, Germany will hardly be able to afford to exclude high-performance suppliers," Deutsche Telekom said in a statement to POLITICO. Telefónica Deutschland and Vodafone echoed that statement.

Underscoring the friendly ties between German authorities and Huawei, the firm last month opened a center in Bonn called the Security Innovation Lab, where “a close and regular cooperation between the [German Federal Office for Information Security] and Huawei is planned” that would include “the verification of product safety,” the company said at the launch.

Arne Schönbohm, president of the Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), said in a statement that the lab "will allow further and deeper technical exchange between Huawei and BSI to address the future challenges of cyber security.”

Huawei last month tried to get German consumers on its side too, through an advertisement campaign that included quips referencing Berlin’s struggle to upgrade its telecom networks to 5G. The underlying message is that the country needs Huawei’s gear to make its transition to fifth-generation internet networks happen.

"What will cover more of Berlin,” one ad said, depicting an elderly lady holding a Maltese dog. “5G or dog poop?"

Janosch Delcker and Annabelle Dickson contributed reporting.

https://www.politico.eu/article/telecoms-donald-trump-war-on-huawei-zte-splits-europe/


Europe should be wary of Huawei, EU tech official says

Francesco Guarascio, Foo Yun Chee
4 MIN READ


BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The European Union should be worried about Huawei [HWT.UL] and other Chinese technology companies because of the risk they pose to the bloc’s industry and security, the EU’s technology chief said on Friday, echoing concerns raised elsewhere in the world.


European Commission Vice-President Andrus Ansip attends the GovTech Summit at Paris city hall, France, November 12, 2018. REUTES/Charles Platiau
Huawei expressed disappointment at EU tech commissioner Andrus Ansip’s comments, saying it had never been asked to install technology that could be used for spying and never would.

“Do we have to be worried about Huawei or other Chinese companies? Yes, I think we have to be worried about those companies,” Ansip told a news conference in Brussels, days after a top executive at Huawei was arrested in Canada as part of an investigation into alleged bank fraud.

Huawei, which generated $93 billion in revenue last year and is seen as a national champion in China, faces intense scrutiny from many Western nations over its ties to China’s government.

Ansip said he was concerned because Chinese technology companies were required to cooperate with Chinese intelligence services, such as on “mandatory back doors” to allow access to encrypted data.

SPONSORED

He also said the companies produced chips that could be used “to get our secrets”.

“As normal, ordinary people we have to be afraid,” he said, adding he did not have enough information about the recent arrest in Canada.

Huawei called such comments misunderstandings and denied it posed a security threat.

“Huawei has never been asked by any government to build any backdoors or interrupt any networks, and we would never tolerate such behavior by any of our staff,” the company said in a statement.

“Cyber security needs to be addressed jointly at a global level, and equipment vendors should not be treated differently based on their country of origin. Singling out one vendor does nothing to help the industry identify and address cyber security threats more effectively,” it said.

Separately, sources with knowledge of the matter said on Friday Huawei would spend $2 billion as part of efforts to address security issues raised in a British government report earlier this year.

Germany, meanwhile, said it opposed excluding any manufacturers from the planned construction of 5G mobile networks.

However, Belgian newspapers L’Echo and De Tijd reported the country’s center for cybersecurity was considering the possibility of banning Huawei in Belgium. The company supplies equipment to telecom providers Proximus (PROX.BR) and Orange Belgium (OBEL.BR).

The center was not immediately reachable for comment.

The EU as a whole is braced to launch a far-reaching system to coordinate scrutiny of foreign investments into Europe following a surge of Chinese investments and concerns about security and forced technology transfer.

However, the arrest in Canada of Huawei chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou relates to a U.S. investigation into an alleged scheme to use the global banking system to evade U.S. sanctions against Iran, people familiar with the probe told Reuters.

Facebook finds bug exposing users' photos
Europeans too could potentially face prosecution in the United States, which has withdrawn from an agreement with Iran on its nuclear program. Reimposed U.S. sanctions have already forced many European companies to stop trading with Iran.

Meng was due to appear in a court on Friday as she awaits a possible extradition to the United States.


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...of-huawei-eu-tech-official-says-idUSKBN1O611X
 
One thing is for sure. It proves beyond any doubt that Huawei network technologies are far more superior to that of what the West can offer. Banning Huawei and resort to kidnapping are the only ways to keep out the superior competitor. Accusing Huawei of cyber theft without any shred of evidence to show has become the standard operating procedure of the West. What a sham!
 
Is there such a plan? Can you share more details?
Based on my assessment, China's optimal strategy as the Cold War against the US plays itself out is to take the fight to the enemy by capturing or killing all US troops in Afghanistan. The US troops there are easy picking, low hanging fruit and have nowhere to run or hide.
 
Based on my assessment, China's optimal strategy as the Cold War against the US plays itself out is to take the fight to the enemy by capturing or killing all US troops in Afghanistan. The US troops there are easy picking, low hanging fruit and have nowhere to run or hide.
upload_2018-12-16_15-15-20.png
<< can you please translate this
 
Last edited:
One thing is for sure. It proves beyond any doubt that Huawei network technologies are far more superior to that of what the West can offer. Banning Huawei and resort to kidnapping are the only ways to keep out the superior competitor. Accusing Huawei of cyber theft without any shred of evidence to show has become the standard operating procedure of the West. What a sham!
It will cause a backlash becos when all Chinese are using 5G , Europe and American will still using substandard 4/5G network.

5G is critical not just for mobile streaming and download but future full autonomous of automobile and AI industries in application of aviation, transport and self supporting system. They need accurate, fast and large data transfer in order to do the job as per instructed.

It is not China loss that they don't get Huawei 5G. It's their loss that soon western countries will lack behind in AI and autonomous industries compare to China.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/bijank...tonomous-cars-wont-work-until-we-have-5g/amp/
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom