What's new

How Russia is winning the war in Ukraine

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Nov 4, 2011
66,428
-55
99,890
Country
China
Location
China

How Russia is winning the war in Ukraine​

Less than six months after the Wagner rebellion, when the Western media was frantically writing Vladimir Putin’s obituaries, Russia is well and truly headed towards victory in Ukraine.


New Delhi | Updated: December 2, 2023 16:50 IST


Russia-Ukraine


The longer the war continues, the harder it will be for Ukraine to stay in it, especially without unflinching support from the West. (REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Representational)

Since Russia invaded Ukraine last February, the war has seen its fair share of ups and downs. Now, for the very first time since the beginning of the conflict, Russia appears to be in a pole position to emerge victorious — perhaps not any time soon, but eventually.

And Vladimir Putin, Russia’s strongman president behind the invasion, is as powerful as ever, less than six months after the Western Media was scrambling to write his obituary during the Wagner rebellion.

How did things come to this? And can Ukraine still spring a surprise?

With the much-hyped Ukrainian summer counter-offensive a colossal failure, the war in Ukraine has reached an uneasy and costly stalemate, with neither army capable of pushing the other out from the land they currently control. This makes it a war in which endurance is key.

While Russia’s battlefield casualties exceed and outpace Ukraine’s, as a much larger country, it is also far more capable of sustaining these losses. Same is the case for the war’s material costs. While the Russian economy continues to hold fort, with Putin completely bypassing the West’s scheme to limit Russian oil revenues, Ukraine has lost up to 35 per cent of its GDP since the war began.

The bottomline is this: the longer the war drags on, the more costly it gets for both sides, but one side is far better placed to deal with these costs than the other.

West’s weakening resolve

Ukraine’s endurance is especially questionable given the West’s waning appetite to continue its support.

Only 41 per cent of respondents in a Reuters/Ipsos poll from October agreed with the statement that Washington “should continue to provide weapons to Ukraine.” Joe Biden’s $60 billion funding package is stuck in Congress, and Donald Trump, increasingly better placed to succeed him next year, has notoriously been non-committal about continuing any US support.


Crucially, Europe is not doing much better. A 50 million Euro aid package remains stuck with Hungary and Germany (for budgetary reasons), and recently, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni let slip that “Europe was weary”. Recently, Ukraine has had somewhat of a falling out with Poland over the issue of grain export.

“For its own sake as well as Ukraine’s, the West urgently needs to shake off its lethargy,” a recent editorial in The Economist said.

Mood matters

Endurance, however, is not just about material and human resources. Morale matters — soldiers constantly risking their lives, as well as civilians facing daily hardships, must believe that their suffering will not be for nothing. In this regard too, Kyiv is faring far worse than Moscow.

Under relentless pressure from the Russian war machine, and amidst faltering support from the West, the mood in Ukraine is somewhat despondent. With this despondency, cracks in the once-united body-politic are beginning to emerge.

President Volodymyr Zelensky is no longer the beloved unifying force he once was, with scandals and corruption denting his image. And amidst the army’s failure to deliver on its lofty promises at the beginning of the summer offensive, war fatigue is slowly, but certainly, gripping the nation.

Russia and Vladimir Putin, on the other hand, are perhaps even better placed than they were at the beginning of the war. As the above-quoted article by The Economist noted: Putin is winning because “he has strengthened his position at home… Ordinary Russians may not like the war, but they have become used to it.”

By framing the conflict to his citizens as “a struggle for survival against the West,” Putin has galvanised support for the war to an extent Western commentators, till recently, did not think was possible.

Ukraine’s path to ‘victory’ — whatever that means

Can Ukraine still come out of the war more favourably than Russia? Yes, but not because of any miracle it can pull off on its own. At this moment, Ukraine is completely dependent on either internal turmoil in Russia breaking down its war effort, or a sudden emergence of political will in the West to manifold increase its support.

The latter is unlikely any time soon, if ever. The former, however, has been more speculated about. Less than six months ago, when Wagner troops were racing towards the Kremlin during their short-lived coup attempt, Western commentators were quick to announce a premature demise of the Putin regime. Many opinion pieces were written about how Russia was going to be thrown into chaos, and why that is good for Ukraine.

But Putin prevailed. He is likely to stay in power for the foreseeable future. As The Economist puts it: “By 2025 the strain of running a war may start to catch up with Mr Putin. Russians may increasingly resent the forced mobilisations, inflation and diversion of social spending to the army. Yet simply hoping that his regime collapses makes no sense.”

For now, Russia is winning the war, whether the West likes it or not.

 
We all know Russia can win a war against Ukraine but with the west support, weaponary, training, aid and heavy sanctions against Russia, I thought Russia would loose the war so I once called for Russia to withdraw back to their borders, especially when Russia offensive collaped and Russia had to withdraw from 100s of km territory. Today Russia is still standing its ground against 40+ nations, unwilling to give up.
 
Russia had won, it's all noise now.
Mark my words, those PDF "military professionals" won't give up even Ukraine did.

-Zelensky government still in power and controls nearly 85% of its territory, and making life hell for the Russians in the other 15%

-All of Russian strategic goals defeated, including their goal of controlling all of Donbass

- Ukraine now firmly aligned with the West for generations, and further expansion of NATO. Just a decade ago, Ukraine was aligned with Russia. This is a huge strategic victory for the US.

- 400K dead and wounded Russians, over 13,200 equipment losses with no end in sight. Front line has remained mostly static for the last year.

-Just because Ukraine hasn’t achieved 100% victory doesn’t mean all of Russia’s strategic goals haven’t been defeated
 
I don't see how Russia wins. His goal was demilitarization and change of government in Ukraine. Russia is further away from his goals than at the beginning of the war.

Both Russia and Ukraine have lost very hard.
 
- Denazification failed
- Demilitarization failed
- "liberation" of Kiev failed
- "liberation" of Eastern Ukraine fails

The aim of the Russians was to annex Ukraine, and with current situation the only result is defeat.
 
Russia is wining, ukraina sends old men and women to front, political turmoil against Cocainski is in full swing, russians advancing on all fronts, i predict full collapse of ukrainian fron in late 2024, early 2025.
Ukraina lost offensive capabilities, if they are smart they should dig, dig and dig fortifications in depth of hundreds km.
 
So far no party has achieved their most desirable outcome yet but Russia seems to be winning the war of attrition now, troops and ammunitions are depleting on the Ukrainian side with nato cant seem to keep up with production of artillery rounds
 
I don't think Russia is winning right now. What's the final objective? Kiev or maintaining Crimea?
Ukraine has punched above its weight by sinking important black sea fleet ships and targeting the HQ in Crimea.
Also last couple of days two rail lines have been destroyed by saboteurs deep inside russia. This war will drag on for far longer.
 
Last edited:
Russia is wining, ukraina sends old men and women to front, political turmoil against Cocainski is in full swing, russians advancing on all fronts, i predict full collapse of ukrainian fron in late 2024, early 2025.
Ukraina lost offensive capabilities, if they are smart they should dig, dig and dig fortifications in depth of hundreds km.
And Russia is loosing also. Putin just asked the Russians to have more babies at least 8 babies. That's show that Russian is loosing a lot of man.

Russia is totally loosing in terms of strategic military etc.. exactly like @Trisolaran said in #8
 
What's the final objective? Kiev or maintaining Crimea?
Might as well be Kiev at this point, Putin just redefined the war from special military op to war of liberation, meaning much higher level of commitment. I think Ukraine is fucked. if their troops exhausted into a total collapse it would be stupid of Putin not to take Kiev.
 
And Russia is loosing also. Putin just asked the Russians to have more babies at least 8 babies. That's show that Russian is loosing a lot of man.

Russia is totally loosing in terms of strategic military etc.. exactly like @Trisolaran said in #8
That is strategic thinking in advance, i do not think it is strictly related with war in ukraina, it has more with distant future of russia as civilization, they are heavily under populated country with enormous resources.
Ok, they are loosing lets take that for sake of argument as true but ukraina is losing much more in every aspect, so you can extrapolate it as russian win, in prolonged war prospects of russian decisive win are much higher due fatigue of ukraine and diminishing material support from west and increasingly impact of woken and enlarged russian military complex.
If ukraina is smart they would ask for peace while they are still in hand to hand position on field.
Eu ditched them, usa is in election year and aid package is stuck in congress meaning their front will suffer even more.

Might as well be Kiev at this point, Putin just redefined the war from special military op to war of liberation, meaning much higher level of commitment. I think Ukraine is fucked. if their troops exhausted into a total collapse it would be stupid of Putin not to take Kiev.
No, he does not want to rule over hostile population, he will demand demilitarization and abandoning nato ambitions of kiev regime after he seize teritories historically more connected to russia.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom