how many nukes india have??

[rigam niga]

20 is enough of for both pakistan and china so whats the need of 100 nuke?.Anything more than 50 is waste of money and resources(don't know why pak made so many nuke)

 

[Emmie]

Having 10 or 1000 doesn't really matter. You have nukes and that's enough.

 

[T90TankGuy]

i doubt any one on this forum know the answer to the question.

 

[rigam niga]

Having 10 or 1000 doesn't really matter. You have nukes and that's enough.[/QUOTE

than why pak made so much nuke?

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

we need minimum 200

 

[Infinity]

we need minimum 200

If i become Pm, then every house in country will be given one..........

 

[pmukherjee]

20 nukes are as good as 100. We have enough. That is all that matters. China has more but still China did not go the way of USA and USSR which made nukes in thousands.

 

[JanjaWeed]

If i become Pm, then every house in country will be given one..........

lol.. is that what you are going to have on your poll manifesto? don't give that idea to tamil nadu politicians.. next thing you know.. they will be distributing free nuke warheads instead of a colour tv or mixer grinder!

 

[Tumba]

with nuke deal India can import fissile material in bigger quantity ... and with ever increasing no. of nuke reactors ... India can reach big no's in matter of months ... so if right now India has only 100.. we can build more than. 500 in matter of months... but its totally unnecessary ... but if thr's some lunatic takeover of pakistan and chinese want to push the borders/// India will do it... for
Mutually Assured Destruction ...

 

[harpoon]

Each nuke apart from the production cost will also come with extra costs of protecting it, so it makes no sense in producing more and more warheads like Pakistan. They already have more n-warheads than UK

 

[EastWest]

India should not worry about the number of nukes coz 20 nukes are more than enough for destruction of any nation on this planet. Let it be China, Pakistan, USA or us.

We should concentrate on making them more techonlogicall superior.i.e., Smart Nukes etc..

 

[ganesh177]

Having 10 or 1000 doesn't really matter. You have nukes and that's enough.

Agreed.
Then why dont pakistan settle down for reasonable figure of 60-80, instead of continuosly striving for more and more.

 

[lem34]

guys,
according to many sources available on internet,estimation of indian nukes are 80-100.
but few days back,i read report,according to which india had enough fissile material to build 150+ in 2000.
its hard to believe the figure of 80+.
and china+pakistan nukes figure is 500+ or near.so if india really wanted to be ready with double front war then we must have atleast 350+ or to be an last surviving state.

what u say??

i think you need many more than 350 if your test in 98 was anything to go by

---------- Post added at 07:18 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:15 PM ----------

Nukes are just wasted figure.. no sane country will ever use it...

UK didnt use it in balkans.. Soviets didnt use it in Afghanistan or US never used it in Viets or anywhere else.

PS: only lunatic mad countries will boast the figures and threaten to nuke another one by saying " we will we will nuke you"...

I think israel or americca may prove you wrong. It all depends if america is prepared to peacefully accept a new order where they are not number 1?

 

[harpoon]

Agreed.
Then why dont pakistan settle down for reasonable figure of 60-80, instead of continuosly striving for more and more.

In a way its good news for Indian defense as more and more Pakistani defense budget will be sucked into the nuclear sector rather than conventional technological sectors.

 

[janon]

i think you need many more than 350 if your test in 98 was anything to go by

---------- Post added at 07:18 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:15 PM ----------


Great, I'm assuming that this is the invitation that many have been waiting for. From this point the thread can be another grand internet battle.