Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
BCCI killed cricket by breaking the balance between sport and commercialization, and by introducing geopolitical issues into the game. That's why nobody really cares about cricket anymore except for India. Cricket now is like WWE: showbiz. It's no longer competitive, and marred with corruption.India did not kill cricket. India revived cricket with money. The West Indies cricket died because the athletes were drawn to American sports. Once that happened only Australian remained no 1 in the late 90s. For whatever reason SL, BD, ZIM, SA all went on a downward spiral. Pak is also not investing in the sport.ultimately, this needs the investments and it should come from within.
Care to name any prominent west indians plying their trade in American sports? Cricket died in Windies for the same reason it is dying in Lanka, Pakistan, Zimbabwe and South Africa...Lack of financial viability and dwindling public interest. And India played a crucial part with it's big three stunt in making these board even less financially viable.India did not kill cricket. India revived cricket with money. The West Indies cricket died because the athletes were drawn to American sports. Once that happened only Australian remained no 1 in the late 90s. For whatever reason SL, BD, ZIM, SA all went on a downward spiral. Pak is also not investing in the sport.ultimately, this needs the investments and it should come from within.
cricket is alive and kicking in Australia, England, NZ. I am here and it's ok. Asian countries are well supported by Indian money but they are unwilling to invest on their part. BCCI has to follow Indian govt advise on terror related stance and most Indians support that. Well even SA ere not allowed for decades because of geo politics. In India's case we are only not going to play Pak bi laterally, so that should not have any overall impact or only minimal impact. However the balance between commercialization and sport needs to be there and an equilibrium is being reached.BCCI killed cricket by breaking the balance between sport and commercialization, and by introducing geopolitical issues into the game. That's why nobody really cares about cricket anymore except for India. Cricket now is like WWE: showbiz. It's no longer competitive, and marred with corruption.
simple google https://www.newsamericasnow.com/10-professional-us-athletes-with-caribbean-roots/Care to name any prominent west indians plying their trade in American sports? Cricket died in Windies for the same reason it is dying in Lanka, Pakistan, Zimbabwe and South Africa...Lack of financial viability and dwindling public interest. And India played a crucial part with it's big three stunt in making these board even less financially viable.
Out of these only one is prominent i.e. Carmello and he was born in US, only a few immigrated from Caribbean, some were born in US and there are a few females in there as well. Needless to say none of these are being lost to Caribbean cricket. There is no athletic talent from Caribbean shunning cricket and going for US sports in large enough consequential numbers. This is just a red herring to divert away from the real reason for the decline, lack of financial viability and BCCI led stratification.cricket is alive and kicking in Australia, England, NZ. I am here and it's ok. Asian countries are well supported by Indian money but they are unwilling to invest on their part. BCCI has to follow Indian govt advise on terror related stance and most Indians support that. Well even SA ere not allowed for decades because of geo politics. In India's case we are only not going to play Pak bi laterally, so that should not have any overall impact or only minimal impact. However the balance between commercialization and sport needs to be there and an equilibrium is being reached.
simple google https://www.newsamericasnow.com/10-professional-us-athletes-with-caribbean-roots/
why should it die in Pak? You have a huge population, a well established structure and domestic circuit, enough international games and get a good share of revenue. ICC is not going to pay for grounds or other infra in every country. Pak also has issues at the top where a lot of bickering occurs, players are too religious and have one eye always on religioues matters, and the board apparently didn't pay them on time.
in SA, the black population were never much involved in cricket, so its an internal issue and the ICC is doing a great job in getting blacks and it will take a few decades. Even now we see 50% mixed. eg, Rabada, bavuma, Ngidi, Keshav Maharaj and shamsi. that's 5/11.
India did not kill cricket. India revived cricket with money. The West Indies cricket died because the athletes were drawn to American sports. Once that happened only Australian remained no 1 in the late 90s. For whatever reason SL, BD, ZIM, SA all went on a downward spiral. Pak is also not investing in the sport.ultimately, this needs the investments and it should come from within.
Cricket will die in all poor nations anyway, the trick is to become rich enough…!Care to name any prominent west indians plying their trade in American sports? Cricket died in Windies for the same reason it is dying in Lanka, Pakistan, Zimbabwe and South Africa...Lack of financial viability and dwindling public interest. And India played a crucial part with it's big three stunt in making these board even less financially viable.
Sadly most rich nations don't play cricket and a couple that do, cricket is 4th or 5th ranked sport in those countries...Good luck keeping it alive with homegrown talent of India playing on dead tracks generating high scoring matches while burying veggie phast bowlers into the ground.Cricket will die in all poor nations anyway, the trick is to become rich enough…!
Carib cricket started going downhill from mid nineties.. the Lara, Ambrose, Walsh era was the last of the greats that started in late 80s and ended in late nineties with Chanderpaul being the last to go in the 2000s. Bcci had no muscle then.Out of these only one is prominent i.e. Carmello and he was born in US, only a few immigrated from Caribbean, some were born in US and there are a few females in there as well. Needless to say none of these are being lost to Caribbean cricket. There is no athletic talent from Caribbean shunning cricket and going for US sports in large enough consequential numbers. This is just a red herring to divert away from the real reason for the decline, lack of financial viability and BCCI led stratification.
Pakistan has a large cricket playing population and an ok structure, but it's being actively isolated by an Indian led apartheid against its player and team and cannot sustain itself financially. The grassroot level cricket is completely gone. With elite capture in full swing eating up remaining meager resources, the domestic structure will be gone in the medium future.
Cricket will go back to the colonial days where only three or four teams competed internationally and even they will make way for the premier domestic competition IPL, a la NBA. Cricket will go the way of NBA or Premier League.
Australia, NZ, Netherland, England are not rich nations.Sadly most rich nations don't play cricket and a couple that do, cricket is 4th or 5th ranked sport in those countries...Good luck keeping it alive with homegrown talent of India playing on dead tracks generating high scoring matches while burying veggie phast bowlers into the ground.
The hoards of people lining up to migrate to these countries at any cost disagree with you.Australia, NZ, Netherland, England are not rich nations.
If you guys need to defend your failed nation, at least dignify your excuses
.