What's new

How can you hold someone accountable?

Jango

ADMINISTRATOR
Sep 12, 2010
21,533
99
29,779
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
The media and GEO in particular are constantly making a shout hat the people responsible should be brought to justice. In the case of kharotabad incident and then this incident, you should and you can hold someone accountable but the GEO TV is saying that responsible people should be court martialled in the military establishment as to why suicide bombings are taking place!!....you cannot change or court martial a person that a suicide bombing took place. you cannot stop a bomber, if you stop him from going to his target, he will just explode at you.And why the hell you need to change the army official. It is the responsibility of the police to control the internal situation unless emergency is imposed .

So my question is that is it really possible to hold someone accountable in the establishment for the majority of suicide bombings?:undecided::what:
 
nice idea, they have been given way too much freedom during musharaff period, they display killings and blood pools without any censorship.

But lets get serious and is it really possible?
 
is it really possible to hold someone accountable in the establishment for the majority of suicide bombings?
You poor, suffering, clueless people...Where do I start?

Let's start with democratic governance. True democratic governance starts from the bottom up. That is what democracy is all about. The New England town hall meetings where mayors were called to account were a far firmer foundation to American democracy than the top-down Parliamentary system of England, which only opened up via miserly steps over the course of centuries and with popular agitation.

So it was that when the Americans sought independence from Britain, not only did the brand-new Continental Congress authorize an Army, it appointed generals to command troops and inspector generals to watch the money. Both reported to Congress.

Pakistan, following the colonial model, has no such check on its uniforms. Indeed, Pakistan didn't have a nation-wide election until 1971, at the insistence of the one general who knew that he lacked the will and capabilities to be an effective dictator, if only because he preferred whiskey over administration.

IMO, Pakistanis will save centuries by rejecting the top-down approach to democracy and must seize local governance themselves. The approach of some Pakistani political parties (Taliban, MQM) approximates this, but no one ever seems to have espoused a philosophy that this service is for all, and that the guardians of the law themselves must stay within its bounds. The easiest way for citizens to do that is to control institutional purse-strings, which is why the lack of tax revenue from its citizens is no real blessing for Pakistanis.

As for the suicide bombings specifically: some Pakistanis, it seems to me, reject the notion of accomplices to crimes, so under this credo only the suicide bomber is responsible for what he does. That is wrong: the people who inspire, arm, equip, and direct him on his mission are also responsible. These are the people one can go pursue before and after suicide attacks.
 
get your fact right first that Taliban is not a political party.

Next is that you have completely got my question wrong. There is a big network there, and you have to arrest the people in that network, but is it right to be holding army officials or police officials accountable that a suicide bombing took place in their jurisdiction.? If you stop a suicide bomber from getting to his target, he will just blow up at you!@
 
i guess they shud be removed as they make deals with america,became their front line allies and let them destaiblize pakistan...
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom