- Mar 21, 2008
- Reaction score
you claims are self-contradictory and laughable. waht an idiot. coupling maudoodi with JUI of shabbir usmani is enough to expose your ignorance and intellectual dishonesty. waht a jahil. and people have claimed this since the beginning, not a later day creation jackass.This is a laughable later-day recreation based on fictional accounts and a retro-fitting of the role of the ulema into the freedom struggle. Nobody for all these years had claimed any role for the ulema, it is already the consensus that Maudoodi was an example of those Islamic scholars who actively opposed Pakistan, and actively opposed Jinnah. Right through, from all existing accounts, except those that are being posited today by Islamicists, it was clear that the secular principles of the Muslim League were opposed tooth and nail by the Ulema.
However, since it is clear that you are on a crusade, there is no point in discussing history or historical events with you.
the involvement and also their role in moblizing masses is easily proved from vol3 of the book of sharifuddin pirzada, pg 286, containing resolutions of muslim league, which called form ulema to issue fatwas in its favor and deliver speeches in masajid on fridays in its favor.
you are an intellectually dishonest person. who tries to look a sophisticated well read man, with no knowledge.
i am the only one who is saying that all accounts should be considered. you are asking to exclude some. this is what intellectual dishonesty is.Right through, from all existing accounts, except those that are being posited today by Islamicists