What's new

Hindus must produce 10 kids for Modi to become PM again: Shankaracharya Vasudevanand

I wish as much attention was given to the abortion of unborn females by families who want a son. I wonder where they will find females in the next few years. The unique demographics you talk about are the creation of you doing. The way to correct this is stop the murder of unborn females.

Abortion of female fetuses in northern India results in gender imbalance
The unbalance in birthrates is because other religions will not abort just because there are females being born. Be proud of your daughters do not kill them before they are born

yes, there are abhyans and plans already under motion.

Who is this guy? Never heard his name.


he is the shankracharya hahaha... one of the highest 4 priests of Hindus and most learned ones. They need to learn other religions too and only after debate and elections they are made Shankracharya

Shankaracharya - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
yes, there are abhyans and plans already under motion.
in my opinion there should be no law stopping or allowing marriage but ethics of a person should let them decide what he wants to do. The issue of conversions, there should be a check on NGOs who force people through financial entrapment and at the same time governments should not give incentives to convert. The issue will die down itself if there is a control on the political front on conversions as seen in recent times. If you make it a competition many Muslims who are not interested in politics are sucked into it in the mix and there is dividing on religious lines, which will cause problems in society.
 
Maybe because Hinduism doesn't have the concept of polygmy.
Thats is almost correct. Hindus follow the concept of Maryada Purshottam Ram. Means one who has just one wife and remains in his limits with other women is the most noble.

Other hand Krishna had 16000 wives, but those were the ladies who he rescued from a king and in return these women offered themselves to lord Krishna. But he although officially married them but denied any bhog (physical relation ship). And hence he had to manifest in 16000 forms with different personality same time to settle with them , which makes him monogamist. 1 person 1 wife.

in my opinion there should be no law stopping or allowing marriage but ethics of a person should let them decide what he wants to do. The issue of conversions, there should be a check on NGOs who force people through financial entrapment and at the same time governments should not give incentives to convert. The issue will die down itself if there is a control on the political front on conversions as seen in recent times. If you make it a competition many Muslims who are not interested in politics are sucked into it in the mix and there is dividing on religious lines, which will cause problems in society.

Shankracharya is a highly learned person and he understands the need to Uniform Civil Code. This whole bhashan bazi is to enforce Uniform Civil Code. Otherwise Politicians in future, will use religion and minority in their vote bank policy. After UCC is implemented minority appeasement for votes and bad politics will reduce.

Coming to the Law regarding marriage and ethics, well they come from education and religious values. but this does not guarantee that even a learned person will follow monogamy. The current situation demands that Polygamy is not suited for a social welfare and model of nuclear family.
 
The total number of children remain the same even if a community has multiple wives from that community. When one man is married to two woman that means another will remain single all his life. Only few rich people in Muslim community have multiple wives which results in few poor Muslim men remaining single. Muslims have one more child on average compared to Hindus in India. Muslims are not going to support uniform code in India.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom