14.2 lakhs indians in Saudi Arabia alone..now whats ur point??
Does that explain why India isn't a part of the 'Organisation of the Islamic Conference' whereas Pakistan is?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
14.2 lakhs indians in Saudi Arabia alone..now whats ur point??
by surrendering to INDIA
Does that explain why India isn't a part of the 'Organisation of the Islamic Conference' whereas Pakistan is?
wishful hindustany thinking....however our stance is remaining unchanged, so indians can continue to do what they do best.....empty words, rhetoric and day-dreaming
the indians are acting as if this is their victory, though i fail to see tha part where the A.L. ever supported hindustani stance on occupied Kashmir
so i fail to see what their ruckus is about here
wishful hindustany thinking....however our stance is remaining unchanged, so indians can continue to do what they do best.....empty words, rhetoric and day-dreaming
what it has to do with topic and I said that they could have supported them
do u wanna know more ??
Indians in Arab lands - Times Of India
Dispute with India
India has also hit out at the OIC for supporting UN demands for a plebiscite in Kashmir. Further to this, during the 2008 Amarnath land transfer imbroglio the OICs condemnation of the ongoing excessive and unwarranted use of force against the Kashmiri people was met by an Indian response that said: The OIC has once again chosen to comment upon Jammu and Kashmir and Indias internal affairs on which it has no locus standi. . . . To call for international involvement in the sovereign internal affairs of India is gratuitous [and] illegal, and [it] only reflects reversion to a mindset that has led to no good consequences for Pakistan in the past.[45] The UN stated that it was concerned about the violent protests in Kashmir and the reaction from the Indian state and called for restraint from both sides.

And even after that, they are not supported, it does speaks volumes, what?
Does that explain why India isn't a part of the 'Organisation of the Islamic Conference' whereas Pakistan is?
wishful hindustany thinking....however our stance is remaining unchanged, so indians can continue to do what they do best.....empty words, rhetoric and day-dreaming
err..the kind of relationship is described in your post,and the behaviour of the Arab league dont seem to go hand in hand,rather its exactly the opposite.
OIC stands for 'Organization of Islamic Conference'. The name explains what the requirement is for becoming a member. Only those countries which have adopted Islam as the basis of their constitution, are its members. Indian Constitution, OTOH, is based on secularism.
Does that explain why India isn't a part of the 'Organisation of the Islamic Conference' whereas Pakistan is?
wishful hindustany thinking....however our stance is remaining unchanged, so indians can continue to do what they do best.....empty words, rhetoric and day-dreaming
dude- you have no control over 1/4 of your own country , and you want more land to govern !!!?
