and once this lady not in office , BD will became Taliban country , coz few people always going to shout 'Islam Khatre me hain' for one reason or another..
JAR BIE TAR HUSH NAI PARA PORSHIR GHUM NAI

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
and once this lady not in office , BD will became Taliban country , coz few people always going to shout 'Islam Khatre me hain' for one reason or another..

I think, the decision by your Aunti has tremedously made you guys unhappy. But, she has saved the country from radicalization. A srcularism would have a very negative reaction among the population. it would have created more storms and the radicals would have recruited their kind more in number.
So, you should congratulate your pretty Aunti for taking a Statewoman-like decision. We will remain an Islamic country, but not a Taliban country, where people would always say, 'Islam Khatre me hain,' whereby they themselves are the cause of this danger. Pakistan's Zia like people will not be born in Bangladesh. We will remain a moderate Muslim country.
Read my post. Where did I equate Islam as our state religion with Islamic Republic of Bangladesh. BD will remain as it is now, a moderate Muslim country. Try to impose a Hindu brand of secularism, it will bring about more radicalism than now. The country will fall prey to the fanatics who will love to see AL takes a wrong decision.
By the way, why do you think AL has got the mandate to proclaim a SECULARISM in Bangladesh? It will have to seek authorization from the voters. Can you guys expect to get a majority on this point?
Why do you guys want a secular Bangladesh? Would you mind telling us the name of a country which is secular, except in proclamation? And if the population are not secular minded why it is necessary to incorporate such a meaningless word in the Constitution? We do not have to follow the bad Indian example where the people do not touch others of lower rung, yet their Constitution says they are secular. It is a hypocrisy.
Now, you can eat your lichis, mangoes and jackfruits to your heart's content if you come to Bangladesh.
Actually, his point is that the AL pretty much gets a lot of Indian support. Dipu Moni was basically placed there by India. Probably the worst foreign minister in the history of Bangladesh.
I know because she was my family's neighbor and vehemently opposes everything Pakistani. She even cursed at my dad for buying a Pakistani product.
Gotta love the crazy fantasy world of the AL, jeez...they are such a classic.
The AL are mindless egotistical freaks themselves. They really do not stand for any ideology. Not even Socialism.
AL == 'chor'
When the PM says she wants the country to be Islamic that means she is going to do something un-Islamic or is already doing it.
Jeez, by the way, means Jesus, and that is how it is said since you cannot take the Lord’s name in vain in Christianity.
Nice to know that you are a Christian too!
Not necessarily. You can not prove that if we want to see Moderate Muslim Bangladesh then we have feeble mind and less faith on our religious faith. We will want to see (simply as a Muslim) a Moderate Muslim Bangladesh is one thing, and we have our individual faith (more/less) on ourselves about religion is another thing.
7. Now Indian media is spreading that extremisms are growing in BD
8. Today BD is a threat for India in future (spread by Indian media)
Yes religion is a very powerful emotion, and it has given Bangladeshi Muslims a reason to be united more strongly somehow, where the common thing is we all are Bangladeshis and have respect to each other. And about troubles caused by religions: what troubles BD has faced in its life? We known about the incidences of religious riot in India. Has BD ever seen any such thing?
-Well, if India is not Hindu state then why there is sill religious turmoil in some places, also has history of several big turmoils like Gujrat riot? And being Moderate Muslim Country we have no such records.
- WHy are you implying that we are remained in stone age. We know where cow pee is drunk! And where the record of marry between ............................and record of many more things.
I did not say anything on favor of Hujis. I just said the common people opposing AL's secularism are not fundamentalist.
You need to retake a course on India steadies, especially the Indian/"orange media propaganda chapter". Not written by Indians, lol.
You are definitely paranoid from India perspective.
Now stop laughing.
Let me answer some of the points that you have raised in yoour post.
1) You are right about BD being a moderate Muslim country. It should stay that way.
2) Bangladesh's 1st Constitution was made secular. You have to understand which foreign country influenced this newly born and very weak country to incorporate this Clause. Certainly it was not China, Russia or USA. Your then Ambassador to BD may know why and how it happened.
This secularism was not acceptable to the population. It backfired on the face of Sk. Mujib and his mentor across the border. Unpopular Mujib was killed. But, even today many people do not try to really understand why there was such a violent reaction. Population and military establishment both saw him enemy of Islam and BD.
3) In case of BD, it was just opposite. Refer to 3) above.
4) Law enforcers cannot just enter the houses of Hujis and kill all of them. This could have been done during the secular time of Mujib. He formed a Rakkhi Bahini that killed anyone who was perceived as against the ruling party and its secularism.
No wonder, Mujib became so unpopular that very few Bangladeshis uttered at hearing his death, 'inna lillahe wa inna alihe rajeun.'
5) I have read many newspaper articles that want to keep the relationship between BD and Pakistan. They do not want an improved relationship by crying 1971. BD people do not have to hate Pakistan to love India. India must show a positive attitude instead of bullying and imposing an unbearable trade imbalance with BD. 6) People in BD are not paranoid, but they are disturbed by the attitude of India who tries to control Bd affairs through their paid proxies.
7) No, Bangladesh is not a major player in the international politics. But, if you consider our country's total area, you will see we are playing a much robust role in that field. An economically strong BD can certainly play a stronger role in the future.
8) BD people do not pretend to be super rich. This is how Indians project themselves. However, the entire world knows about the reality of the countries that exist in the entire south asia.
I must say, Indians should get rid of their false grandoise as if their life style is at par with the Bombay films.
---------- Post added at 02:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:08 PM ----------
Us Muslim love Jesus! Jesus for king!!!
Dipu Moni is not even Muslim. Actually I don't know what her and her family's religion is, lol. But definitely, she is not Muslim!
Mujib was not killed because he was secular. He was killed because he attempted to make Bangladesh as an Awami League fiefdom. So, please do not ride the gossamer wings of fantasy. You can befool the babes born well after, but not those who have seen the events unfold.
I have not understood your ‘ 3) In case of BD, it was just opposite. Refer to 3) above.. The ‘3’ is not above but in the same line. So what is to be referred?
It is true that law enforcers cannot barge into the house of Hujis. But surely, the law can ensure their arrest in a legal manner.
Bangladesh does not have to hate Pakistan to love India. And if the newspapers want a union with Pakistan and you all feel so, then go ahead? Who can stop you? Just do it. Nike it fast. Why whine and want your cake and eat it too?!
Look India does not require Bangladesh to survive. If you feel that Indian trade and agreements is bullying or whatever, please don’t trade with India and don’t sign agreements. QED!
If Bangladesh is doing well, then good for it. Hurrah is what I say. But what concern it is of India except that it has a viable country as its neighbour and sooner it becomes economically strong, lesser will be the ingress of the illegals? It is a win win for India if Bangladesh becomes economically viable.
I know Bangladesh is not super rich. The world knows it too. As far as India is concerned your claim that India is not way ahead of many, I think you are living in a Fool’s Paradise. Check the world estimates and you will realise where India is and where are the others.
What is the grandiose lifestyle that Mumbai films show? In India, today every household has a Colour TV, cooking gas, some sort of transportation, mobiles, so on and so forth. They all wear natty clothes and have fancy gizmos too. For the fancy clothes, I will confess that the cheap Bangaldeshi clothes sold on the footpath and the cheap Chinese gizmos have indeed played a yeoman’s role!
You are partly correct about Mujib. Mujib was killed because the concerned army officers were frustrated with his leadership. He was not a very bright administrator. His sons were very evil. They used to go to people's houses and kidnap their wives and daughters to forcefully marry them. One of them was the wife of one Major Dalim.
His sons used to take much of the aid money and whatever was left in the bank for themselves, I mean, Bangladesh after the war received a LOT of aid. And not just that, there were many factors behind his assassination, much of it due to disgruntled army officers. Zia was reluctant to protect him for that very reason. No such thing as law & order back then.
Some people go as far as saying that if Mujib wasn't assassinated, then Bangladesh would have already fallen into India's hands. And the people that were saying this did live through the horrors of the Liberation War and its aftermath.
Skies is right if you take it into the context of Bangladeshi opinion. Many Bangladeshis have come to believe that India does not want Bangladesh to do well in all areas. Maybe you would want to see Bangladesh do well, but does India's politicians? That is the question.
Bangladesh's political and business LEADERSHIP is the one thing that is hindering its progress, but that is a another matter in your argument.
Not too long ago, if your memory does not fail you, you will recall that Bangladesh was an international breadbasket case. Don’t take my word for it, check what DAWN has to say:
Success and failure | | DAWN.COM
In case of India, it is not long ago that it was a dirt poor country. It still is, it still lives in poverty. India came to the front suddenly only because some of the IT engineers built small firms in Bangalore and some companies in the USA started to outsource them. Now, a little rich Indian like you come up with some back dated news reports to abuse Bangladesh.
It seems Indians are becoming jealous of the total achievements of Bangladesh. This may be the reason why they were favouring secularism here so that the fanatics come out from hiding and destabilize the country. Your Aunty already knows about this and has avoided falling in your trap. By the way, many Indians call her aunty all the time, but suddenly why you are allergic to it? Why are you against her?
Home | Mail Online
"Pakistani and Bangladeshi households are the most likely to be workless at 22.3 per cent, while Indian households are the least likely, at 6.8 per cent."
By the way, many Indians call her aunty all the time, but suddenly why you are allergic to it?
If India was dirt poor, you would have been grovelling under the West Pakistani boot.
India has not come into the forefront suddenly. It always had the potential, but it was hamstrung with the socialistic pattern of life, where the womb to the tomb philosophy prevailed.
Liberalisation came into being and Indians found their place.
If the US is outsourcing to India, it is not because they love us, it is because we have the knowledge and expertise and they have no option!
Let us take a neutral place with equal opportunities for comparison i.e. the UK.
Here it proves that in every aspect Indians lead.
So, there you are!
No more whines please!
You should be in Jay Leno's show. You would bring the house down.
Jealous of Bangladesh?
A speck on the horizon of inconsequential effect on the world map.
What a circus!!
Tell me your achievement and give a comparative study with India and Pakistan.
Let it then be known who is Jealous!!
really?
have you been working in Indian household to know tht many Indian call her Aunty? Good to see you have read my post elsewhere and corrected your spelling.
Be gracious enough to thank me.
When your country is suffering from extreme poverty, you are clowning here to have come from a high family. Go out in the streets and report us what you have seen. Do not get out of your mind by reading the news article I have posted about the abject poverty of India and Indians like you. Even another 100 years of development will not cure your ills. Because your SECULAR country is infested with snobbery of a few while the entire country is dirt poor.
Our poverty rate has been downed to only 31.5%. Compare it with yours. Moreover, Indian poors number 5 times more than the entire population of Bangladesh. Here a camouflaged snob comes with a 50 year old backdated report to show BD is a 'bottomless basket case.' You must be a good joker.