The_Sidewinder
SENIOR MEMBER
it's Porsche, dude. If you are going to correct someone, do it right. lol
Me got trolled. lol
Thanks for the correction mate, it was mere typing error.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
it's Porsche, dude. If you are going to correct someone, do it right. lol
We are not interested in standing on the high morale ground, we need to achieve the goal in a cost-effective way. We don't have patience to develop a fighter in a 30 years long period.lol French never complained about design privacy .... but US and Russia often claim about stolen design o F-16 / Su-27 etc....
We are not interested in standing on the high morale ground, we need to achieve the goal in a cost-effective way. We don't have patience to develop a fighter in a 30 years long period.


You just can't call DSI obsolete when you can't build a fighter with DSI at all.
trouble of introducing DSI into the latest toy.
don't give me crap about the input because Tejas had major input from virtually all major aircraft manufacturers/companies.
on the contrary after some prototypes produced in China, the JF-17 production was launched in Pakistan.....
, the experience gained by you over the last 50 years drastically represents it'self in the forum of Tejas...
which is only running 20 odd years behind schedule.

Pakistani can talk about whatever the damn hell they want. And your or anyone else's ideas of anything otherwise will have their arse thrown out of this forum permanently.
thats why you don't know anything about DSI , this is the disadvantage of not developing the own thing , that you don't know what DSI is actually and what is use . Their are other ways which give the same result which DSI gives. just for your knowledge.We are not interested in standing on the high morale ground, we need to achieve the goal in a cost-effective way. We don't have patience to develop a fighter in a 30 years long period.
Let them start with a car first.... We have been license producing Fishbeds since the 70"sSorry , for your short lived happiness:
Develop an aircraft from scratch then only you know the real teething problem for pakistan aerospace industry if there any.
In Other news : For everything like licence production, we got Miggy ,Sukhoi and Jaguars since 60s.That's more than 50years back and you guys can't even produce 50 jets in 7 years.
what exactly do you mean ?



So Indians and their stone age dinosaur LCA again?
LCA, huh? Let me think...errrrrr...
HAHAHAHA
To paraphrase some other guys' words " when I heard about LCA the first time I was in the primary school. It was on the drawingboard...now my son almost graduates from the middle school, it is still on the drawingboard."
There's a Batman Forever, perhaps bollywood can make a film of LCA Forever as well, with all the juices of hindoostan eternal non-stop dances so on so forth you know?![]()
then LCA is enoughcorrected*IAF: *starts sobbing*

Means that person should stick to the topic
So Indians and their stone age dinosaur LCA again?
LCA, huh? Let me think...errrrrr...
HAHAHAHA
To paraphrase some other guys' words " when I heard about LCA the first time I was in the primary school. It was on the drawingboard...now my son almost graduates from the middle school, it is still on the drawingboard."
There's a Batman Forever, perhaps bollywood can make a film of LCA Forever as well, with all the juices of hindoostan eternal non-stop dances so on so forth you know?
ndia should have just stuck to importing foreign aircraft from Europe or Russia. Anyone who does not see LCA TEJAS as a failure is obviously delusional