What's new

For Tejas, a Long Way to Go Before it Protects the Indian Skies

we are not like PAF / china which field un-tested plane and then wonder why plane crashed and why didn't Parachute didn't open.

well its reaches the same speed your JF-17 can fly and also tell you it has thousands less rivets then JF-17 and it can make faster due to less joints.....


Well.... When IAF have the plane it will be battle ready unlike other plane which are not tested fully. Mark -2 is more advance then Mark-1 , so why IAF buy mark-1 in large quantity.

like PAF didn't buy Su-27 when learnt that india buying Su-30 ( more advance then Su-30). Plane are build of period of time and one over another.
MK2 is far away, you can put it into service when you have MK100. You lacks of foreseeing in design phrase, the fuselage is too mediocre. You pay the price for your conservation.

You just can't call DSI obsolete when you can't build a fighter with DSI at all. What a weird logics you have?! The biggest problem for Tejas is that the compatible engine Kaveri had failed, which means youmwont able to produce it in large quantity.
 
Last edited:
MK2 is far away, you can put it into service when you have MK100. You lacks of foreseeing in design phrase, the fuselage is too mediocre. You pay the price for your conservation.
At least we have Guts of Public Disclosure Unlike CCP Regime Which Hides its Substandard Reverse Engineer Junks Under Tag of Classified And Hide there Faces in Mud when Any Elite Defense Experts Raise there Doubt about it :D:D:D:D
 
MK2 is far away, you can put it into service when you have MK100. You lacks of foreseeing in design phrase, the fuselage is too mediocre. You pay the price for your conservation.
You just can't call DSI obsolete when you can't build a fighter with DSI at all. What a weird logics you have?! The biggest problem for Tejas is that the compatible engine Kaveri had failed, which means youmwont able to produce it in large quantity.
lol , go and learn about the project and some Science .. and then came to argue......well the World Best plane F-22 don't use DSI .... it tell everything for your super duper DSI ....... now go brag about DSI which make your plane better then F-22 .....

the Tejas Fuselage use Composites which can't even Chinese think of which still uses decade old technology for metal combining with rivets....Welcome to 21st century.....where no metal frame uses now.

Moreover in 1990 DSI was tested in f-16 which you hacked and used in one of your plane , the reason you don't know what DSI do is because you simply copy and past it and don't know what it do and don't. its adv. or its dis Adv. is.

dose you WS Series engine failure stopped production of 50 JF-17?
 
Last edited:
lol , go and learn about the project and some Science .. and then came to argue......well the World Best plane F-22 don't use DSI .... it tell everything for your super duper DSI ....... now go brag about DSI which make your plane better then F-22 .....
don't dare to ask the question mate they hide there junk copies under tag of Classified 8-)
 
At least we have Guts of Public Disclosure Unlike CCP Regime Which Hides its Substandard Reverse Engineer Junks Under Tag of Classified And Hide there Faces in Mud when Any Elite Defense Experts Raise there Doubt about it :D:D:D:D
You Don't have to hide it cause everyone knows LCA failed. You are loser. Your country produce a fighter that your air force detests from the bottom of their heart.
 
You Don't have to hide it cause everyone knows LCA failed. You are loser. Your country produce a fighter that your air force detests from the bottom of their heart.
Sorry LCA still didn't crashed and while JF-17 crashed killed one pilot and parachute didn't open ..... reason : design Failure .... go test the plane once again..... and then came back ....

IAF want best and everything tested unlike JF-17 ....please next time test the plane for seat ejection and also test the parachute opening thing also.
 
wanglaokan .... i thought you are sense-able poster why you are becoming a troll?
Some of the Indian members really need some education, ignorant to death.

Sorry LCA still didn't crashed and while JF-17 crashed killed one pilot and parachute didn't open ..... reason : design Failure .... go test the plane once again..... and then came back ....

IAF want best and everything tested unlike JF-17 ....please next time test the plane for seat ejection and also test the parachute opening thing also.
The parachutes you bought from Japan never open.
 
don't dare to ask the question mate they hide there junk copies under tag of Classified 8-)
You don't have to hide it cause every single piece of key component is bought from overseas, it's naked. Even the design was a French one.
 
You Don't have to hide it cause everyone knows LCA failed. You are loser. Your country produce a fighter that your air force detests from the bottom of their heart.
See i Told you finally you accepted you hide your reverse engineering junk under tag of Classified :enjoy::enjoy::enjoy:Bravo Bravo.As for Lca Even in failed State Its better than your Substandard copies :azn::azn:

You don't have to hide it cause every single piece of key component is bought from overseas, it's naked. Even the design was a French one.
Just like you copied IAI LAVI or A.k.A J-10:rofl::rofl:Like your was made in PRC still dependent on Ruskies for Engines other Stuff Calling us copied.:p:P:P
 
See i Told you finally you accepted you hide your reverse engineering junk under tag of Classified :enjoy::enjoy::enjoy:Bravo Bravo.As for Lca Even in failed State Its better than your Substandard copies :azn::azn:
Whatever you make yourself feel better, it just failed.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom