Yep, and you can rebuild them all undergound to escape the nuclear fallout. You can then rename yourselves the Morlocks.
By the way, I don't believe nukes can really eliminate a country. But it sure can eliminate a super power status
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yep, and you can rebuild them all undergound to escape the nuclear fallout. You can then rename yourselves the Morlocks.
By the way, I don't believe nukes can really eliminate a country. But it sure can eliminate a super power status
Human being doesn't have the power to do that. Anyway, as I said, it's about Biden's rationality. Nuke war or watching Puting attack NATO countries. Up to Biden.Well let's see the soot from 100/1000's of nuclear weapons lighting everything on fire would severely affect the ozone layer, the weather suddenly gets colder and crop fail. That's just a start.
I disagree. With the whole post. Yes,I want them to be neutral,but I disagree with all that. They basically won the Winter War.Stalin Should have ended the finnish state in 1945.
"Finland" was historically part of Russia. They are geographically close to st.petersburg/european Russia. Russia let them secede, but requested a land swap that would push them away from threatning st.petersburg.
Finland refused. They went to war against a gutted soviet army that had been purged of half its officer force recenly by stalin. THEY LOST THE WAR and were near complete collapse when they started begging for peace. Which Russia gave them generous terms for the loser.
not 2 years later, they allied with nazi germany, invaded the soviet union, and even participated in the siege of st.petersburg that caused the starvation of millions of Russians.
Round 2, Russia had defeated the Nazis, and was planning on retaking finland and ending them. AGAIN they took pity on finland, and in exchange for Finland switching sides against germany, they were allowed to exist. In exchange for FOREVER REMAINING NEUTRAL, AND NEVER THREATNING St. PETERSBURG"
How is it in Finlands interest to now turn back on this agreement, and volutarily deploy foreign military forces right on the Russian heartland?
Is it because the CIA said so? or their 30 year old democrazies cashier prime minister ? Why are the euros soo dumb and incapable of independent thought? its ridiculous how incompetent western governments have become
What do you mean doesn't have the power to do that?Human being doesn't have the power to do that. Anyway, as I said, it's about Biden's rationality. Nuke war or watching Puting attack NATO countries. Up to Biden.
Human being doesn't have the power to do that. Anyway, as I said, it's about Biden's rationality. Nuke war or watching Puting attack NATO countries. Up to Biden.
Why complaint about it when it was just a "Bluff" like you said?All non-American NATO members should know this from ordinary Americans. The only function of NATO is bluffing. America didn't even prepare to war with Russia.
From where you saw me complaining? I gave a suggestion to those NATO countries and those that want to join in NATO for their own good. US is not trustworthy.Why complaint about it when it was just a "Bluff" like you said?
If you believe in this is a bluff, then it should be A-OK for you? Don't you think??
This is complaining........From where you saw me complaining? I gave a suggestion to those NATO countries and those that want to join in NATO for their own good. US is not trustworthy.
Nah, he will vote for.Erdogan will not allow it because of Sweden appliciation.
This is a symbloic threat inderictly aimed at testing Russians. If Russia back off and stay hesitant about punishing the finnish then Russia will lose the big game. They are testing the will of Russians. Joining NATO is not a necessity for the Fins, they are being played by west. A weak pawn that is going to examine capabilities of a giant neighbor.
Russians should do something to Poland in the first place, Poland is getting rude. They should understand the consequence of threatening Russian national security with their lives.
Take a large part of Ukraine, punish rude Pols, Swedes and Fins for your own national security.
Yeah the Russians regret not "Finnishing them."Stalin Should have ended the finnish state in 1945.
"Finland" was historically part of Russia. They are geographically close to st.petersburg/european Russia. Russia let them secede, but requested a land swap that would push them away from threatning st.petersburg.
Finland refused. They went to war against a gutted soviet army that had been purged of half its officer force recenly by stalin. THEY LOST THE WAR and were near complete collapse when they started begging for peace. Which Russia gave them generous terms for the loser.
not 2 years later, they allied with nazi germany, invaded the soviet union, and even participated in the siege of st.petersburg that caused the starvation of millions of Russians.
Round 2, Russia had defeated the Nazis, and was planning on retaking finland and ending them. AGAIN they took pity on finland, and in exchange for Finland switching sides against germany, they were allowed to exist. In exchange for FOREVER REMAINING NEUTRAL, AND NEVER THREATNING St. PETERSBURG"
How is it in Finlands interest to now turn back on this agreement, and volutarily deploy foreign military forces right on the Russian heartland?
Is it because the CIA said so? or their 30 year old democrazies cashier prime minister ? Why are the euros soo dumb and incapable of independent thought? its ridiculous how incompetent western governments have become
Russia has reasons to launch a missile attack to Polish military bases that smuggles weapon to Ukraine, but I think they are afraid of a trap by twisted Americans to start WWIII.
My bet is that nothing will happen if Russia blow up all the warmongering poles.
But it's a bet, maybe twisted Americans are seeking a excuse to launch a nuclear first strike against Russia, or maybe not.
I think American wont move a finger to protect any NATO member. They just are seeking developed Europe self destruction economically.
I dont know if a WW nuclear war can be won, but USA acts as they could it.
The dangers of a first strike are:
a) Enemy retaliation: But maybe USA can stop all the foes ICBM with his shield, and maybe they have a millions underwater drones in the oceans searching and following enemy SSBN positions (they can afford it).
b) Planet weather problems / Nuclear Winter: There is no public information about what USA can do making changes to ionosphere, but maybe they have solved this problem years ago and nobody knows it.
Ionosphere is charged of energy, and maybe they can move that energy through chain reactions or something like that.
Compare USA behavior now with USA behavior in Prague Spring 1968, in Prague Spring the West acted sanely to avoid a escalation, but now USA is seeking actively a escalation against Russia. They are insane, or they can win a nuclear WWIII.