please stop with your personal attacks and insults and racism
you think pothwaris and pandava bandars are humans and afghans and pathans are sub-human?
what filthy racism is this?
Afghanis are subhuman maulvi.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
please stop with your personal attacks and insults and racism
you think pothwaris and pandava bandars are humans and afghans and pathans are sub-human?
what filthy racism is this?
A big LOL @ OP. This is like reading stromfront shit. Claiming other peoples' legacy and history as your own is a habit of defeated and worthless people.
Afghanis are subhuman maulvi.
i dont think he did that. He has posted about Bakhtiari and Lur women warriors who participated in Zand Dynasty of Iran against Afghan attacks
Also, Afghanistan has deep cultural and historical connections with Iran, as they also share a language, and much of their history
i have visited Hayward in California, and LA, and met American Afghans.
They are no different that Pakistani Americans. Normal people stuck in the rat race.
Didnt find anything sub-human about a human race
When you call Pandavas "bandars", you're calling Jarrals and Janjuas bandar. I hope people belonging to one of these tribes are present on PDF
And I didn't say anything against Pakistani Pakhtuns. Afghanis though... Well how can someone like a race of pedophiles and homosexuals haha.
Btw, the fact that the darri speaking OP(a faggot) was calling Punjabis beghairat doesn't seem to bother you
And dude, if your childish didn't amuse me so much, I would have already put you in an ignore list.
Which century does this Female Warrior belong to. Old fashioned gun and horses....
Yeah im familiar with this poem of his but it isn't mentioned in here that the women urinated on their faces.Sorry, I wrongly attributed something to Kipling. Kipling didn't talk of golden showered but mentioned wounded soldiers given to Afghan women to be tortured. He based this on reports that Afghan women would castrate and torture wounded soldiers. He mentions that in this poem: When you're wounded and left on Afghanistan's plains, and the women come out to cut up... - Rudyard Kipling at BrainyQuote
I mixed Kipling and the other shower source up. My bad.
Haram
completely haram
but riding and shooting good men is haramI'm sorry man with respect, riding horses for women is not haram.
no , you are sub-human .Afghanis are subhuman maulvi.

@Serpentine @Kaan @kollang @Newno , you are sub-human .
go kill yourself you racist shyte .
good thing is , that you're a brownie . u would have bashed the world if u were white
i hate racism more than anything
whatever subhuman .
racists are as low as garbage
"Luffy" never uses word "martial race", dont spread lies. Martial race is british word and is popular in indics, not pashtuns. Races are not martial....culture , enviroment and circumstances make you warrior. Physique and height doesnt matter, you need guts.
Pashtuns are warriors for thousands of years, did they need certificate of martial race from british?. Unlike punjabi musalman, sikhs and gurkhas, very small number of pashtuns were recruited by british. The total number of pathan soldiers in WW1 was six thousands while in WW2 the number was 18 thousands only. British were particularly fascinated by fighting skills of Afridis, they tried their best to recruit them in large number but due to high desertion rates and their reluctance to fight against their own people, they were excluded from enlistment in regular army and they were only recruited in khyber rifles. Pathans were rather troublesome enemy to british till the end, than useful servants.
Pathan sepoys were insignificant in british indian army. The most numerous in british indian army were punjabi musalman, and most favourite of british were gurkhas followed by sikhs).
"Luffy" never uses word "martial race", dont spread lies. Martial race is british word and is popular in indics, not pashtuns. Races are not martial....culture , enviroment and circumstances make you warrior. Physique and height doesnt matter, you need guts.
Pashtuns are warriors for thousands of years, did they need certificate of martial race from british?. Unlike punjabi musalman, sikhs and gurkhas, very small number of pashtuns were recruited by british. The total number of pathan soldiers in WW1 was six thousands while in WW2 the number was 18 thousands only. British were particularly fascinated by fighting skills of Afridis, they tried their best to recruit them in large number but due to high desertion rates and their reluctance to fight against their own people, they were excluded from enlistment in regular army and they were only recruited in khyber rifles. Pathans were rather troublesome enemy to british till the end, than useful servants.
Pathan sepoys were insignificant in british indian army. The most numerous in british indian army were punjabi musalman, and most favourite of british were gurkhas followed by sikhs).
