What's new

Explanation of why Africans were discriminated

tower9

SENIOR MEMBER
Sep 19, 2018
6,214
-20
9,086
Country
China
Location
United States
Pretty educated and nuanced explanation of China's system and why it allows discriminatory practices, not only against Africans but also against other foreigners and Chinese citizens.

The main problem is that the Chinese system is geared towards performance and results, and does not care about values such as individual rights and human decency. This mentality is ingrained in Mainland China.

 
Pretty educated and nuanced explanation of China's system and why it allows discriminatory practices, not only against Africans but also against other foreigners and Chinese citizens.

The main problem is that the Chinese system is geared towards performance and results, and does not care about values such as individual rights and human decency. This mentality is ingrained in Mainland China.



 

I don't care to listen to these guys. They aren't fair and balanced. They are propagandists.

The current issue with discrimination against Africans in China is largely limited to Guangzhou. Yet these guys have their video titled "Why are Blacks not allowed in China".
 
The main problem is that the Chinese system is geared towards performance and results

China is a meritocracy of people with IQ in the low to high 100s. They have 1.4 billion people. Some low IQ nations like those in Africa, where most are at or below mental retardation is not a valuable recipe for success for China.

US is not a meritocracy. They promote racial equality, Ivy league schools cap the number of East Asians because they are too smart compared to everybody else. And US have lower standards for Africans to job entry and college entry. Let Africans flood the US.

China should never be ashamed of being a meritocracy that rewards Han Chinese for being so smart. No need to accept any Africans because they are incompatible to Chinese culture.

Africans are perfect for Amerikan culture. There is going to be over 4 billion sub-Saharan Africans by 2100 that are looking for a better place. China is not that better place, USA is, US should have unrestricted African immigration because they are about diversity and things have worked so well for cities like Baltimore and Detroit. Centers of multiculturalism.

 
China is a meritocracy of people with IQ in the low to high 100s. They have 1.4 billion people. Some low IQ nations like those in Africa, where most are at or below mental retardation is not a valuable recipe for success for China.

US is not a meritocracy. They promote racial equality, Ivy league schools cap the number of East Asians because they are too smart compared to everybody else. And US have lower standards for Africans to job entry and college entry. Let Africans flood the US.

China should never be ashamed of being a meritocracy that rewards Han Chinese for being so smart. No need to accept any Africans because they are incompatible to Chinese culture.

Africans are perfect for Amerikan culture. There is going to be over 4 billion sub-Saharan Africans by 2100 that are looking for a better place. China is not that better place, USA is, US should have unrestricted African immigration because they are about diversity and things have worked so well for cities like Baltimore and Detroit. Centers of multiculturalism.


I don't believe in racial hierarchies in intelligence. I think someone's intelligence is shaped by their experiences, culture, environment and opportunities. I believe that all human beings should be treated with the same rights, dignity and opportunities. It is a basic standard of fairness and decency.

This is the main problem with China's system. This basic value is not respected. Instead, the ends always justify the means which leads to a great deal of moral ambiguity and immoral conduct. This does not win the respect of the world or other people.

China needs to seriously change. It needs to join the civilized world in this regard.
 
US is a total success of mixing East Asians and Africans. They tell how East Asians and Africans can live together "peacefully".


The Chinese are simply too "magnanimous" to host any large population of Africans. Keep the US as the place where East Asians and Africans mix so "well":

 
US is a total success of mixing East Asians and Africans. They tell how East Asians and Africans can live together "peacefully".


The Chinese are simply too "magnanimous" to host any large population of Africans. Keep the US as the place where East Asians and Africans mix so "well":


The behavior of some Black thugs do not represent all Black people. I agree that those thugs are trash and should be punished harshly. But the culture of the ghetto is a product of hundreds of years of dehumanization, you cannot ignore that fact. Why do many Black Jamaican and Black Nigerian immigrants achieve great success in the US yet many Black people who live in the ghetto turn to crime? The reason is culture, and culture is shaped by many factors, one of which is the history of experiences.
 
Pretty educated and nuanced explanation of China's system and why it allows discriminatory practices, not only against Africans but also against other foreigners and Chinese citizens.

The main problem is that the Chinese system is geared towards performance and results, and does not care about values such as individual rights and human decency. This mentality is ingrained in Mainland China.


i fear for this guy's well being

regards
 
I don't believe in racial hierarchies in intelligence.

Science does.

Genes are Key to Academic Success
FeaturedGeneticsOpen Neuroscience Articles
·September 5, 2018

Summary: A new study reports genetic factors count for about 70% of stable academic achievement throughout schooling.

Source: UT Austin.

Parents always worry about whether their children will do well in school, but their kids probably were born with much of what they will need to succeed. A new study published in npj Science of Learning by researchers from The University of Texas at Austin and King’s College London explains the substantial influence genes have on academic success, from the start of elementary school to the last day of high school.

For many years, research has linked educational achievement to life trajectories, such as occupational status, health or happiness. But if performing well in school predicts better life outcomes, what predicts how well someone will do throughout school?

“Around two-thirds of individual differences in school achievement are explained by differences in children’s DNA,” said Margherita Malanchini, a psychology postdoctoral fellow at the Population Research Center at UT Austin. “But less is known about how these factors contribute to an individual’s academic success overtime.”

Malanchini and Kaili Rimfeld, a postdoctoral researcher at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience at King’s College London, analyzed test scores from primary through the end of compulsory education of more than 6,000 pairs of twins.

Researchers found educational achievement to be highly stable throughout schooling, meaning that most students who started off well in primary school continued to do well until graduation. Genetic factors explained about 70 percent of this stability, while the twins shared environment contributed to about 25 percent, and their nonshared environment, such as different friends or teachers, contributed to the remaining 5 percent.


Genetic factors explained about 70 percent of this stability, while the twins shared environment contributed to about 25 percent, and their nonshared environment, such as different friends or teachers, contributed to the remaining 5 percent. NeuroscienceNews.com image is in the public domain.
That’s not to say that an individual was simply born smart, researchers explained. Even after accounting for intelligence, genes still explained about 60 percent of the continuity of academic achievement.

“Academic achievement is driven by a range of cognitive and noncognitive traits,” Malanchini said. “Previously, studies have linked it to personality, behavioral problems, motivation, health and many other factors that are partly heritable.”

However, at times grades did change, such as a drop in grades between primary and secondary school. Those changes, researchers said, can be explained largely by nonshared environmental factors.

“Our findings should provide additional motivation to identify children in need of interventions as early as possible, as the problems are likely to remain throughout the school years,” said Rimfeld.

[divider]About this neuroscience research article[/divider]

Source: Rachel Griess – UT Austin
Publisher: Organized by NeuroscienceNews.com.
Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com image is in the public domain.
Original Research: Open access research for “The stability of educational achievement across school years is largely explained by genetic factors” by Kaili Rimfeld, Margherita Malanchini, Eva Krapohl, Laurie J. Hannigan, Philip S. Dale & Robert Plomin in Science of Learning. Published September 4 2018.
doi:10.1038/s41539-018-0030-0

See also

FeaturedNeurologyNeuroscienceOpen Neuroscience Articles
More evidence ultrasound can help in battle against Alzheimer’s disease
[divider]Cite This NeuroscienceNews.com Article[/divider]

[cbtabs][cbtab title=”MLA”]UT Austin”Genes are Key to Academic Success.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 5 September 2018.
<http://neurosciencenews.com/genetic-academics-9806/>.[/cbtab][cbtab title=”APA”]UT Austin(2018, September 5). Genes are Key to Academic Success. NeuroscienceNews. Retrieved September 5 2018 from http://neurosciencenews.com/genetic-academics-9806/[/cbtab][cbtab title=”Chicago”]UT Austin”Genes are Key to Academic Success.” http://neurosciencenews.com/genetic-academics-9806/ (accessed September 5 2018).[/cbtab][/cbtabs]

Abstract

The stability of educational achievement across school years is largely explained by genetic factors

Little is known about the etiology of developmental change and continuity in educational achievement. Here, we study achievement from primary school to the end of compulsory education for 6000 twin pairs in the UK-representative Twins Early Development Study sample. Results showed that educational achievement is highly heritable across school years and across subjects studied at school (twin heritability ~60%; SNP heritability ~30%); achievement is highly stable (phenotypic correlations ~0.70 from ages 7 to 16). Twin analyses, applying simplex and common pathway models, showed that genetic factors accounted for most of this stability (70%), even after controlling for intelligence (60%). Shared environmental factors also contributed to the stability, while change was mostly accounted for by individual-specific environmental factors. Polygenic scores, derived from a genome-wide association analysis of adult years of education, also showed stable effects on school achievement. We conclude that the remarkable stability of achievement is largely driven genetically even after accounting for intelligence.

[divider]Feel free to share this Neuroscience News.[/divider]

https://neurosciencenews.com/genetic-academics-9806/
 
China is a meritocracy of people with IQ in the low to high 100s. They have 1.4 billion people. Some low IQ nations like those in Africa, where most are at or below mental retardation is not a valuable recipe for success for China.

US is not a meritocracy. They promote racial equality, Ivy league schools cap the number of East Asians because they are too smart compared to everybody else. And US have lower standards for Africans to job entry and college entry. Let Africans flood the US.

China should never be ashamed of being a meritocracy that rewards Han Chinese for being so smart. No need to accept any Africans because they are incompatible to Chinese culture.

Africans are perfect for Amerikan culture. There is going to be over 4 billion sub-Saharan Africans by 2100 that are looking for a better place. China is not that better place, USA is, US should have unrestricted African immigration because they are about diversity and things have worked so well for cities like Baltimore and Detroit. Centers of multiculturalism.


That's how Hitler thought. So now Chinese believe in eugenics too and are pushing for it?

It's enlightening to learn new things about Chinese and they sound so close to Hitlers ideology.
 
This why "minorities" mainly first gen and second gen immigrants in the west should cut it with using "racism card" or as for Muslims "Islamophobia" card and using psuedo-leftists as pawns as there is a lot of discrimination and xenophobia in their own homelands

I think he will be fine. He's not a serious challenge to the system. If he was, then he'd have to worry. But his influence is pretty miniscule.

Serpentza is crap but one time he was pretty good now he is Falung Gong shrill but I am not a fan of Nathan Rich as he is a CCP shrill
 
This why "minorities" mainly first gen and second gen immigrants in the west should cut it with using "racism card" or as for Muslims "Islamophobia" card and using psuedo-leftists as pawns as they is a lot of discrimination and xenophobia in their own homelands



Serpentza is crap but one time he was pretty good now he is Falung Gong shrill but I am not a fan of Nathan Rich as he is a CCP shrill

Nathan Rich is a creep.
 
Yeah his backround is pretty creepy like serpentza

Nathan Rich was a criminal in the USA. He fled to China and found an opportunity being the PRC's pet Laowai and creating propaganda for the Chinese state. It's the best opportunity that he will ever get so he's sticking to it.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Back
Top Bottom