One could also argue ISIS is defending Sunnis from the aggressive Shia majority, so your hypocrisy still stands.
That would be a very poor argument.
http://time.com/4717319/mosul-iraq-offensive-civilians-human-shields/
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
One could also argue ISIS is defending Sunnis from the aggressive Shia majority, so your hypocrisy still stands.
Al-Saud family is the ideological and financial supporter of ISIS.
Don't say that everywhere except this forum. However even in this forumISIS is defending Sunnis

, ISIS is not a Sunni group but imposed on Sunnis by USA and it's regional lackeys.Don't say that everywhere except this forum. However even in this forum
I can provide evidence that ISIS has killed and r@ped hundreds of Mamustas and women in Kurdish controlled areas of Syria and Iraq.
ISIS is not a religious group but a bunch of takfiris who claim that we are the only Muslims and every other Muslims should be slaughtered or enslaved, doesn't put a difference btw Shia or Sunni.
Seemingly we are different in defenition, first you must explain in your POV what or who is a terrorist?
My own explanation, terrorist rebels against a nation, doesn't recognize any kinds of national laws, only chaos and murders everyone of opposites. (((ISIS-AlNusra)))
Hezbollah is a national group raised from Lebanese people and defends them against aggressors. Hezbollah has never said that Christians are infidels, Sunnis are infidels, Shias are infidels or Lebanese national laws is rubbish. They obey Lebanon's government, whether Christian or Shia or Sunni.
Believe me if KSA was a Shia majority country, nowadays ISIS claimed of being Shia LOL. ISIS is not a Sunni group, i have never seen in Sunni books which calls Christians or Shias or Pro-Shia Sunnis infidels , sentenced to get beheaded.
ISIS is organized by USA , CIA , trained in the countries which USA has complete dominance , Turkey-Afghanistan-Jordan, funded by KSA and UAE and ideologically protected by wahabi mentors of KSA.
The Muslim nations of my mentioned countries are innocent, their governments, USA's lackeys , are totally responsible for the creation of ISIS.
USA as the leader of terrorism in our region, looked for a basis between Sunnis for ISIS and Al-Nusra but these bastards were disappointed when Syrians elected Assad during the 2014 elections.
I hope you take the point, ISIS is not a Sunni group but imposed on Sunnis by USA and it's regional lackeys.
That would be a very poor argument.
http://time.com/4717319/mosul-iraq-offensive-civilians-human-shields/
@Horus: pls provide a link to the original soucre article (the above is obviously a copy)
If one does not provide this, the credibility of the source cannot be established. Nor can it be verified that the article posted here is unchanged from the original source.
What is the position and purpose of the person posting the (copied) article? Without at least an indication thereoff, there is not much to discuss: its just distribution.
Fan of Sheikh Imran Hosein, not morris.out with it, son.. "basically they deserved it" is what you're saying here.
Eschatologist fan of morris and hossein, yes ?
your morris is a beggar scum who lives for muft in a nice tropical area and begs arab sunnis to make donations so he can propagate sharia and apologize for the jihadist ideology, that's who morris is.
Yes I am.

No worry, there is zero critic to EU and US!

Can you still link the original?Originally published by PDF.
I said from certain POV's.
Also, don't believe in everything you hear on the news.
And how exactly is Al-Saud family related to this?
Here's the best proof that i can get you, a classified document leaked by Wikileaks, in which Hilary Clinton is suggesting that we should use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia so they stop their financial and logistic support of ISIS. Hilary Clinton had access to classified information herself, and wouldn't be lying in a classified document.
What nobody is mentioning, even on this forum, is that these attacks are a retaliation for attacks by the west on the Islamic world. the CIA call this 'blowback'. Basically if you bomb somebody else, they will retaliate.
I'm no big fan of al-saud but dude you gotta be serious. their airbases host the u.s air force that cover your PMU's a** 24/7 by air strikes, and the British too intervened while you and (probably your shiite friends) are shouting death to al-saud lol, death to america etc. and Iran is actually a state sponsor of terrorism too, they finacially support hezbollah in their multiple wars in syria and lebanon, host the houthi in weapons and arms etc.. this game of pointing fingers between saudia arabia and Iran is hillarious mate.....Al-Saud family is the ideological and financial supporter of ISIS.
Well i have the same feeling. Piotr is right
I am not happy of what happened in Manchester, we are just telling the roots of problems and if your corrupt governors leave the oil dollars of AL-Saud family, such incidents will never happen again.
Meanwhile I used to hate the monarchy of England, the same symbol of colonialism. Despite the crimes they have done all over the world, still alive and arming rebels in Syria and Iraq. Their connection to Al-Saud wahabis is an obvious fact from centuries ago.
Take a look a this :
EU and ME will suffer and suffer because of that racist family. UK continuously sells military equipment to that racist ISIS supporter family.
What goes around comes around
Wait what? The Abidi family were given refuge by the UK government from Gaddafi. They also aided the removal of Gaddafi, which pleased the militants know end. So why did this filth then bomb a stadium full of innocent girls?
There is no reason or justification for what that savage did.