Its kind of stupid fun to argue with a 16 year old (from your posts, I am guessing your age as there is rarely anything mature).But allow me to elaborate on your bold points above:
1) Let's define a "leader".....show me a leader in recent modern history that destroyed a running democratic system after 70 years of Marshal Law. Show me a leader who tells people to attack the Parliament, who threatens almost EVERY SINGLE institute that exists in the country with false rumors and he hasn't produced ONE real fact. But, paranoia is so much that he thinks everyone's after him. That's not leadership kid, that's mental disorder called Bi Polar or Paranoid Schizophrenia. No leader promotes violence. No leader for his OWN greed of power, turns a society into a violent force to overturn a huge majority's elected officials. Anyone who does that, is an anarchist, wants things his way for his own power, doesn't work like a team for the betterment of the country and if you add paranoia to it, is a mental patient.
2) Leaders have positive influence on the society. This guy and his team in every single congregation and public relations statements, openly lies, threatens other, threatens the system and promotes "let's burn down the nation". Is this a leader to you?
3) Allow me to give you a basic definition of a leader based on science and research. These guys from MIT and across the globe spent BILLIONS in researching and they researched and watched every leader since the 1900's:
During the 1900s statistical advances allowed researchers to conduct meta-analyses, in which they could quantitatively analyze and summarize the findings from a wide array of studies done on different leaders in different part of the globe. This advent allowed trait theorists to create a comprehensive picture of previous leadership research rather than rely on the qualitative reviews of the past. Equipped with new methods, leadership researchers revealed the following:
- Individuals can and do emerge as leaders across a variety of situations and tasks.
- Significant relationships exist between leadership emergence and such individual traits as:
One of the MAIN traits of a leader are:
- Intelligence
- Compassion
- Honesty and Care for others without reward in mind
- Adjustment
- Extraversion
- Conscientiousness
- Openness to experience
- General self-efficacy
Positive reinforcement
B.F. Skinner is the father of behavior modification and developed the concept of positive reinforcement. Positive reinforcement occurs when a positive stimulus is presented in response to a behavior, increasing the likelihood of that behavior in the future. The following is an example of how positive reinforcement can be used in a business setting. Assume praise is a positive reinforcer for a particular employee. This employee does not show up to work on time every day. The manager of this employee decides to praise the employee for showing up on time every day the employee actually shows up to work on time. As a result, the employee comes to work on time more often because the employee likes to be praised. In this example, praise (the stimulus) is a positive reinforcer for this employee because the employee arrives at work on time (the behavior) more frequently after being praised for showing up to work on time.
The use of positive reinforcement is a successful and growing technique used by leaders to motivate and attain desired behaviors from subordinates. Organizations such as Frito-Lay, 3M, Goodrich, Michigan Bell, and Emery Air Freight have all used reinforcement to increase productivity. Empirical research covering the last 20 years suggests that reinforcement theory has a 17 percent increase in performance. Additionally, many reinforcement techniques such as the use of praise are inexpensive, providing higher performance for lower costs.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now how much positive ANYTHING you see in IK's behavior and what he's teaching others and in instigating violence and extreme behavior?
The ONLY positive reinforcement that he can do (which he will never do), is to tell people to wait for the next elections and vote smartly and bring in the right people.
However, if he couldn't provide any proof to any wrong doing if that really happens, and he's damaging the entire country, a positive reinforcement would be for the people to get rid of IK's party just like they did to Zardari!
That's a lie.70 years of Marshal Law.
That's a good question, Altaf Hussain is probably the closest you'll get to that. It's definitely not Imran KhanShow me a leader who tells people to attack the Parliament, who threatens almost EVERY SINGLE institute that exists in the country with false rumors and he hasn't produced ONE real fact.
You are lying, again. That is a lie. If you can prove any of Imran Khan's statements a lie, go ahead and prove it, don't just say 'I can prove it'. Also, he never said 'lets burn down the nation'. That's another lie from you., openly lies, threatens other, threatens the system and promotes "let's burn down the nation"
You obviously never listened to any of his speeches. He talks about the importance of education, the importance of democratic right and the importance of democracy. He educates the people. Just take this most recent rally, he talked about how West Germany and East Germany were divided and how democracy helped them become developed nations. That is very positive because that's all news to over 70% of Pakistan's population. Most of them usually have no idea about stuff like that.Now how much positive ANYTHING you see in IK's behavior and what he's teaching others and in instigating violence and extreme behavior?
On the other hand, there wasn't a single instigation of violence or any form of verbal abuse, just like most (if not all) of his speeches.
He also talks a lot about sectarianism, how it's bad, how sunnis and shias shouldn't fight and about unity in the country. Listen to his speeches before you comment on them.
You people did get plenty of proof. Almost every constituency that has been investigated till now showed massive 'irregularities'. Ch.Nisar (the Interior minister) admitted in Parliament that up to 70,000 votes in a particular constituency were (or, as he worded it, 'probably are') 'unverifiable'.if he couldn't provide any proof to any wrong doing if that really happens
The reason he gives is that magnetic ink was not used. So now we're left chasing the magnetic ink and we find out that out of all the samples tested, apparently, the ink used was not of good quality because they did not know that it was expired or something really retarded like that, depending on who you ask.
Magnetic ink: Controversy deepens as ECP fails to find record on selection of ink – The Express Tribune
Nadra admits magnetic ink was useless - thenews.com.pk
Thumb prints verifiable irrespective of ink quality, PCER informed - Pakistan - DAWN.COM
A blot on the electoral record: Minister, ECP officials silent on magnetic ink – The Express Tribune
Election fraud: The curious case of magnetic ink – The Express Tribune
Dunya News: Pakistan:-ECP confirms use of magnetic ink in May 11 general...
NADRA has no system to read magnetic ink: Report
Nadra admits magnetic ink was useless - thenews.com.pk
Thumb prints verifiable irrespective of ink quality, PCER informed - Pakistan - DAWN.COM
A blot on the electoral record: Minister, ECP officials silent on magnetic ink – The Express Tribune
Election fraud: The curious case of magnetic ink – The Express Tribune
Dunya News: Pakistan:-ECP confirms use of magnetic ink in May 11 general...
NADRA has no system to read magnetic ink: Report
Despite all that, we still have this going on:
Parliamentary panel ambivalent over use of EVMs for polling – The Express Tribune
There is absolutely no doubt that there were massive irregularities in the election. If PMLN didn't do it, why did they constantly oppose an investigation? Imran Khan clearly demanded an investigation in only 4 constituencies for 14 months. During the last 2 months, he threatened to start a protest. They could have easily prevented it, start a proper investigation and then use these results to reform the electoral system. IK would be happy and Pakistan's future elections would be free and fair, what more could someone want (unless they rigged the elections)?
In other news, this:
After recount, Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan loses to PTI candidate in Rawalpindi PP-7 – The Express Tribune
There's plenty of proof for all that. Way more than you give for Imran Khan's alleged 'violence and anarchy'. You are accusing him here, burden of proof is on you. Provide proof.
. You are going so ahead about telling me about a leader? I know what is a leader. You don't know what is the system of Pakistan that's why you are saying that. Why don't you raise your voice for yourself and asians in US. As I remember what exactly happened with you guys after 9/11. You guys are still being treated as second citizen and telling us about our rights? Actually you are a fool who is still mentioning his foolish opinions without having knowledge about ground realities.