What's new

Does India need Camouflage technics for its miletry

ptltejas

FULL MEMBER
Feb 13, 2011
1,499
0
578
Country
India
Location
India
Well whether we need camouflage techniques for militry. whether they wii use ful.

plz disscuss about it and post your view regarding.
 
That has to got to be some of the most atrocious spelling I've seen for techniques and military with some of the worst grammar as well.

Please go to school.
 
Such a vague and ambiguous title, what do you possibly hope to achieve with such a remit? India has camouflage for infantry and vehicles that is all in could possibly say without a clearer idea of just what the **** you're talking about.
 
After Geoeye 2 satelite launch it is able to take pictures of few sq feet. The secreat airfield made in jungles are no more hidden. they are open to Geoeye as well as can be see on google map if address is available.


The Geoeye 2 is able to take picture of 10000+ sq km. just within 2 second. All secreat fields are open to them as well as the company is private which can sale pictures to any country. Its hard to believe that they have no enough money to pay to company to collect all secreat data.

The other satelits can also take pictures in infrared band. Near border UAV are free to take pictures.

AWACS is new machine which can scan number of targets.

There r need tecno to hide all weapon and machines, airfield etc from satelites, AWACS, Infrared sensors etc.
 
You can't camouflage invisible...
Your so called military techniques are well described by a US airforce pilot after he experienced them in red flag exercise.
Search on you tube.
 
certainly bro.

what about changing of color of air field. can it be colored green. if its not possible to hide something than confuse them.

like make plastic made dummy plane with small layer of metal. if camera will take photograph they will confuse about total numbers.
if infrared camera take pics they could not differentiate between true and false.

near battelfield such type no of machines can kept to confuse awacs, sar radars, etc.
 
Just think on battle field u found 1000+ tanks like were used in 2nd world war. rubber tank made which after blowing air in to it German were thought enemy shall attack from that side whereas inreal they attacked on normedy beach.
 
Harder to Hide

As the technology of camouflage has advanced over the past hundred years, so has the technology of seeing through camouflage. These days, military forces can use thermal imaging to "see" the heat emitted by a person or piece of equipment. Additionally, they may use radar, image enhancement, satellite photography and sophisticated listening devices to detect the enemy.

To hide from this scanning technology, military forces have to think past visual concealment. In modern warfare, camouflage for equipment and soldiers may be made of material that keeps excess heat from escaping, so their thermal "signature" does not show in thermal imaging. In ships, the major heat source is the engine exhaust. To reduce this thermal emission, some modern ships cool the exhaust by passing it through sea water before it is expelled. Some tanks have a similar cooling system to mask the heat of their exhaust.

To counteract image enhancement -- the amplification of tiny amounts of light (including low-frequency infrared light) -- some armies are developing sophisticated smoke screens. A heavy cloud of smoke blocks the path of light, imparting a sort of invisibility to whatever is behind the smoke screen. According to one report, the United States is working on a smoke screen that would be impenetrable to night vision technologies while still allowing advanced U.S. thermal imagers to function correctly. On a larger scale, the British shipbuilder Vosper Thorneycroft has developed a system that uses a series of water nozzles to produce a constant fog all around a ship, obscuring it from view.

---------- Post added at 11:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:23 PM ----------

Stealth technology allows militaries to hide equipment from radar. In stealth equipment, the surface of a vehicle is made up of many flat planes, interconnected at odd angles. These planes serve to deflect the radar radio waves so they don't bounce straight back to the radar station, but instead bounce off at an angle and travel in another direction. Equipment may also be coated with a layer of "radar-absorbent" material. When a radio wave hits an object, the electrons in that object are excited to some degree, so the wave has passed on some of its energy. In a good conductor, such as a metal radio antenna, the electrons move very easily, so the radio wave doesn't lose much energy in getting those electrons excited. Radar-absorbent material, on the other hand, is a very poor conductor, so there is greater resistance to moving the electrons. Because of this resistance, the radio wave loses more energy, which is emitted as heat. This reduces the overall reflected radio signal.
 
You can't camouflage invisible...
Your so called military techniques are well described by a US airforce pilot after he experienced them in red flag exercise.
Search on you tube.

I agree the USAF is hands down the best AF in the world and we can learn a lot from them and improve our flaw's,we may have had weaknesses ,as a competitor the colonel would no doubt discuss our weaknesses first.The video showed a very professional discussion but the IAF pilots have their good points too.
 
Decoy technology has also advanced in response to modern detection systems. The U.S. Army and other military forces have developed easily-transported, inflatable dummies that not only resemble tanks and other equipment visually, but also replicate the thermal or radar signature of that equipment. To radar and other long-range scanners, these dummies are virtually indistinguishable from real equipment. A less precise decoy strategy is to flood an area with all sorts of objects that show up on radar, thermal-imaging and listening devices, making it harder for the enemy to focus in on any particular piece of equipment.

As detection and spy equipment continues to advance, military engineers will have to come up with more sophisticated camouflage technologies. One interesting idea that is already in the works is "smart camouflage" -- outer coverings that alter themselves based on computer analysis of changing surroundings. No matter how advanced camouflage gets, the basic strategy will still be the approach used by the first human hunters: Figure out how your enemy sees you, and then mask all of the elements that make you stand out.

science.howstuffworks.com/military-camouflage3.htm

---------- Post added at 11:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:30 PM ----------

I agree the USAF is hands down the best AF in the world and we can learn a lot from them and improve our flaw's,we may have had weaknesses ,as a competitor the colonel would no doubt discuss our weaknesses first.The video showed a very professional discussion but the IAF pilots have their good points too.

I cant search a link will u plz give link address
 
Serbia's deception operations in the Kosovo war should be closely studied. NATO bombs mostly destroyed model tanks and NATO anti-radar cruise missiles hit microwave ovens. :yahoo:
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom