GOD OF WAR
FULL MEMBER
Isn't Sudarshan bomb meant for this?
---------- Post added at 09:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:58 PM ----------
I guess we already have a weapon in that category that's there.
Does it work?

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Isn't Sudarshan bomb meant for this?
---------- Post added at 09:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:58 PM ----------
I guess we already have a weapon in that category that's there.

Does it work?![]()

Personal insults.... thats all you can come up with, goes on to demonstrate that you don't have any other arguments.
insults are the linguistic crutch of the inarticulate mofo. it really doesn't matter. And if you've some decent congruent disagreements, KINDLY EDUCATE ME!
Thy weltanshauung be too flyspeck to be engendering any worthwhile edification, seniore.
Keep maintaining your inflated egos, really dont give 2 flying fcuks.Does it work?![]()
No man it doesn't , same was the case with other bombs during kargil you see ..The great mujaheddin had to manually pull off the fuse to initiate the blasts,else they were all duds.. U see the mujaheddin haven't been home for many nights so their urge drove them pull the fuse off to enjoy with the unlucky 72!!!

Chill out! it was meant to be a joke. Don't start rambling about the 9 jdams you dropped during kargil. And as for acting like a troll and mocking Islam, what the hell. tum bhi musalmaan ban jao, tum ko bhi miley gi 72, jal kyon rahey ho???![]()



No that's not true. While economic considerations are indeed important in defence spending, Pakistan's Security needs carry prime importance.
Secondly, its not a matter of 'matching' our defence budget with India or Israel, but matching the 'capabilities' in adequate numbers. Thats the crux of the matter. For instance, India may need an aircraft carrier, but Pakistan does not. On the other hand, it needs adequate weapons platforms to destroy Indian ACCs if and when the situation arises.
Your assertion also is a point of an arms race, which India has started. We are just trying to keep ourselves secure. Even if we don't like want to purchase anti ACC misslies, we will HAVE to due to Indians induction of the same. Its complex and therfore does not have any simple answers.
All in all, I do not think that arms race can ever be curtailed despite conventions and conferences and bodies promoting the idea. Its simply un achievable.
---------- Post added at 04:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:47 PM ----------
Easier said than done, stop looking at things in respect to 'zero-sum'.China ko rokney se pehley, US A-stan se bhaag jaey ga, and then YOU will be stopped
Does it work?![]()
not only buying but to maintain them, means the weapon. a plane on an average takes 3 times the money it costs just to make it combat worthy. 20 million dollar plane will take 60 million dollar in next 35-40 years of its service. so pakistan may buy it or make it but when it comes to manage the upkeep, economy is a dominant or should i say the only factor responsible.
as pakistan economy descent into darkness. the military too will go into stores only.
i cant put on the link right now but as per the interview of pakistani military guy- pakistan spends on 3 soldiers what India spends on 1 soldier. moreover 75% of pak defence budget goes to ration and salary. so neither pakistan is acquiring much nor got the capability of maintaining much
---------- Post added at 04:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:19 PM ----------
only against pakistan

saab jeeaap to 72 ki baat karke emotional kar rahe mere**** ko![]()
Pao bhaji khaney se kaam nai baneyga! Go ask Shusmita Sen if in doubt 
itna dam hey???? go have a double undercut beef steak, then we will talk munnaPao bhaji khaney se kaam nai baneyga! Go ask Shusmita Sen if in doubt
![]()
lagta hai apko sushmita sen
bahut pasand hai .
...
samjhe unklefee .

sirjeelagta hai apko sushmita sen
bahut pasand hai .
aur sirjee double beef stake khane se hi power aati to aaj amreeka ki population china se jada hoti...
baaki us kam ke liye khaali jisaamee hi nahi deemaagee taquat bhee chahiyesamjhe unklefee .
![]()

so are you ready?Does it work?![]()
No need to put up the link, what you are saying is true as I have read the same. But, what you have left out is that countries have defense needs. Unfortunately for Pakistan (and India), these needs cannot be undermined and are rather pivitol. I have also stated above that no doubt, strong economics will propel Pakistan towards strength overall, only a complete bafoon can negate that.
The sovereignty of any state depends upon two things. 1. Its strength to defend itself (in war and in peace) 2. to sustain in self (in war and in peace). Both are co related. All the Indians are ranting over here is one side of the equation and conveniently ignoring the other side.
Of course, defense requires money and money comes from economics, who is differing? point it out if I have done so, But as Indians here are suggesting that we should cut off or reduce our defense budgets is nonsensical. We would like to do that, but 3 wars and the 4th impending one suggests otherwise, Wining wars not only require a proficient military but also diplomacy and economics. So by pointing out to diminish defense in favor of economics or vice versa, both are idiotic. I cannot be charged with either but Indians on this thread suggesting so are either potraying themselves as quite ignorant, either on purpose or not, thats for any one to decide.)![]()
Sushmita sen hmmmm.... Waseem Akram ki amanat
Anyways, enough of this, dont wanna waste the forum's space.


