Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How many support the presence of the European 'observers' on the bail hearing of Binayak Sen ?
Does it not amount to allowing other countries to meddle and pass judgements on our internal matters ?
Give your views and discuss.
About these Observers
Were they sitting with the judge on his chair?
Were they arguing the case with the lawyers?
Were they deposing with the witnesses?
Were they holding the respondent/accused with hand-cuffs?
Were they recording evidence with the Court Clerk?
Were they carrying court files with the Court Chaprasis?
Were they selling tea in the stalls just outside the Court gates?
Were they driving the auto-rickshaws bringing people to the court?
You tell me what they did inside or outside the court-room; then there will be some thing to discuss.
How many support the presence of the European 'observers' on the bail hearing of Binayak Sen ?
Does it not amount to allowing other countries to meddle and pass judgements on our internal matters ?
Give your views and discuss.
How many support the presence of the European 'observers' on the bail hearing of Binayak Sen ?
Does it not amount to allowing other countries to meddle and pass judgements on our internal matters ?
Give your views and discuss.

while i agree with u r comments on internal affairs point of view but i think jus to prove to the world that we r fair, we have allowed these observers.
India is a free country, and as far as I can tell, the court hasn't barred anyone from the hearing.
If the human rights people want to sit in court, let them. We don't have anything to hide.
P.S.: I can telll fromm personal experience that these hearings can be quite boring.![]()
Sorry to say, but they might have even come for cleaning the HC toilet. But does that matter ??
They came to 'observe' a matter that has no bearing on their union in any way and the gut-wrenching thing is that the GoI has allowed them to come here whereas ideally they should have been politely turned down citing 'unwarranted' interference in internal matters of India.
Ok tell me one thing - will UK allow a Indian observer in the trial of an IRA accused or Spain allow one in the trial of a person accused to be having links with ETA ?
It is not that we have something to hide, so we dont allow.
It is something concerning the respect of a country and I am sorry to say we are not acting like self-respecting country allowing a bunch of goras to 'observe' something that is clearly our internal matter.
Egypt, a country the fraction of a size of India in size,population,economy,military showed the finger to the Vatican not to interfere in its internal affairs when the Vatican issued some statements regarding the bomb blast of Christians.
That is how a sovereign country should act. Not like this.
@guns-roses : Dude do you seriously think we need to 'prove' the world anything regarding the internal matters of India ?
HEY HEY,
Take it easy. They came as observers (whatever that is). They come as tourist as well. So they come, they see (as observers or whatever) they blah (tourists do that as well). What is the big deal?
They did not seem to to any of the things that i outlined in my earlier post. If they did any of those things, including cleaning the court toilets, i might have been concerned, because there is scope for real mischief. Looking on and blabbering (if it happens) is just that ;looking on and blabbering, nothing more.
i've grown beyond the point of thinking what other people think of me. i am real, my achievements are real and visible for all (including myself) to see. It is the same for my country (which BTW, is older and bigger than me).
So, What me worry?!?