Did BBC Just Censor Kulbhushan's name from Asad Umar's Interview?

[django]

Well, that's how the world works..if you keep accepting unjust and unfair treatment, they got no reason to change it but if you voice your concerns, they have to listen to you. This is has been missing in the past, at least for large part of my life, but now likes of PM IK, Ms. Shirin Mazari, Mr. Assad Umar and even Mr. SMQ do raise their voices and many times have forced many big players to to take u-turn. And that makes me even more angry on P. Musharraf..coward.

The chap was/is a disgrace no question about it.Kudos bhai

 

[Path-Finder]

Liar Liar pants on fire.

 

[django]

@django @Zibago both parts censored and original

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1073271319356162049

So Asad bhai was up against it even before he began the interview, shame on Mr Sackur and the British B@@sh@T Cartel.Kudos bhai

 

[Path-Finder]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1073254911834447872

This is the most idiotic explanation ever. BBC hard talk asked the question on terrorism them selves and then censor the answer.

Lifafaism exits in UK top journalism as well.

Bbc is state owned media. Highly controlled and recently some of its heads were Israeli i think. So many times it has been caught with bogus production.

 

[Irfan Baloch]

A better excuse would have been that the person handling this suffered an acid attack and could not concentrate on the job.

Modi was not pleased

 

[El Sidd]

Modi was not pleased

Was Theresa pleased?

 

[war&peace]

The chap was/is a disgrace no question about it.Kudos bhai

I mean at least he could have charged NATO supplies instead of getting the bloody humiliating aid. When Pakistan stopped the supplies, USA was forced to use Tajikistan but they did not sell themselves cheap like that rather made US pay full fee upfront so no america can disgrace them on twitter.. and I don't know why even current govt hasn't changed this policy despite all the crap from uncle sam...what has been our response so far other than some tweets?

 

[Irfan Baloch]

Asad does it up the BBC behind at @07:00

Was Theresa pleased?

she is fighting for her political survival she cant care less. it was Indian origin BBC employees and other British Goray who are born to hate on Pakistan. BBC has always hated on Pakistan this is no exception

 

[American Pakistani]

Indian lobby is strong. If Pakistan need to compete, it's citizens has to get higher education and join US UK Western countries political, business and defense circles.

 

[django]

I mean at least he could have charged NATO supplies instead of getting the bloody humiliating aid. When Pakistan stopped the supplies, USA was forced to use Tajikistan but they did not sell themselves cheap like that rather made US pay full fee upfront so no americunt can disgrace them on twitter.. and I don't why even current govt has changed this policy despite all the crap from uncle sam...what has been our response other than some tweets?

Agree at the very least these supplies need to be renegotiated, they need to exercise the maximum leverage from this issue PERIOD.Kudos bhai

 

[El Sidd]

BBC has always hated on Pakistan this is no exception

The entity has vested interest and looks for colonial overhang much of the time.

 

[BATMAN]

Hope this 16 year old kid Asad Umer, now knows a lot about BBC and will refrain from interview in future.

 

[M.AsfandYar]

The chap was/is a disgrace no question about it.Kudos bhai

I am genuinely surprised at his audacity to write what he wrote in his memo

 

[Mahmood-ur-Rehman]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1073254911834447872

This is the most idiotic explanation ever. BBC hard talk asked the question on terrorism them selves and then censor the answer.

Lifafaism exits in UK top journalism as well.

Uk suppressing freedom of expression loosing credibility by employing censorships

 

[Jackdaws]

I think it's between 13 to 15:00.

You'll notice when he speaks about India, there is a lag/skip type thing. First i thought it was a mistake, but then i realised when it was present in two different places it must be deliberate.

That's not on. Even if I don't agree with the narrative, the press especially one with the reputation of BBC shouldn't do such a thing.

This is the sole reason why he should be hanged otherwise there's nobody out there willing to listen to our cause. His death penalty is the only way to expose Indian terrorism. I've said it before and I'll say it again WE NEED a headline that reads;

"Indian spy charged with the deaths of thousands hangs in Pakistan"

No other way to get this message across; a hanging is long overdue.

Yea. That's not going to pan out too well for you either. And if you had an iota of evidence your Govt would have presented it to the world.