What's new

Decline of the US and West

Source:
Decline of the US and West

Not a bad article, but has a lot of selective reasoning.

True, half of the EU economies are screwed.

As far as the US is concerned, it doesn't matter how many money notes they print. They'll continue to be the biggest economy in the world.

The problem with the current Obama administration is that they are using the wrong policies to address the economic issue facing the US. Bush at least managed to keep the economy afloat while managing two wars at the same time. And that takes skill. Obama can barely keep up with the economy, even given that troop numbers are gradually falling in Iraq.




The Cold War ended over 20 years ago.



India rejected the F-16 and F-18 over technical reasons. F-35 is nothing but a money swallowing machine. Also, GoI do not want it to conflict with its FGFA program with Russia.



They sell to whoever they want with strings attached :P

The U S GDP has 2 trillion dollars for which no transaction has taken place, no goods were produced and nothing was done.

No one knows how big the actual U S mi lit ary bu dg et is because its a state secret. No one knows how U S inflation is computed, because its a state secret, except that it doesn't cover food and fuel, which matter most for inflation measurements. And the U S refuses to explain why 10 million people disappeared from the census 1930-1940.
 
Famine killed 7 million people in USA
19.05.2008 / Dmitry Lyskov / Pravda.ru

Another online scandal has been gathering pace recently. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, deleted an article by a Russian researcher, who wrote about the USA’s losses in the Great Depression of 1932-1933. Indignant bloggers began to actively distribute the article on the Russian part of a popular blog service known as Livejournal. The above-mentioned article triggered a heated debate.

The researcher touched upon quite a hot topic in the article – the estimation of the number of victims of the Great Depression in the USA. The material presented in the article apparently made Wikipedia’s moderators delete the piece from the database of the online encyclopedia.

The researcher, Boris Borisov, in his article titled “The American Famine” estimated the victims of the financial crisis in the US at over seven million people. The researcher also directly compared the US events of 1932-1933 with Holodomor, or Famine, in the USSR during 1932-1933.

In the article, Borisov used the official data of the US Census Bureau. Having revised the number of the US population, birth and date rates, immigration and emigration, the researcher came to conclusion that the United States lost over seven million people during the famine of 1932-1933.

“According to the US statistics, the US lost not less than 8 million 553 thousand people from 1931 to 1940. Afterwards, population growth indices change twice instantly exactly between 1930-1931: the indices drop and stay on the same level for ten years. There can no explanation to this phenomenon found in the extensive text of the report by the US Department of Commerce “Statistical Abstract of the United States,” the author wrote.

The researcher points out the movement of population at this point: “A lot more people left the country than arrived during the 1930s – the difference is estimated at 93,309 people, whereas 2.960,782 people arrived in the country a decade earlier. Well, let’s correct the number of total demographic losses in the USA during the 1930s by 3,054 people.”

Analyzing the period of the Great Depression in the USA, the author notes a remarkable similarity with events taking place in the USSR during the 1930s. He even introduced a new term for the USA – defarming – an analogue to dispossession of wealthy farmers in the Soviet Union. “Few people know about five million American farmers (about a million families) whom banks ousted from them lands because of debts. The US government did not provide them with land, work, social aid, pension – nothing,” the article says.

“Every sixth American farmer was affected by famine. People were forced to leave their homes and go to nowhere without any money and any property. They found themselves in the middle of nowhere enveloped in massive unemployment, famine and gangsterism.”

The then state of affairs in the US society can be seen in Peter Jackson’s movie King Kong. The movie starts with scenes of the Great Depression and tells the story of an actress who did not eat for three days and tried to steal an apple from a street vendor. There is food in the city, but many people had no money to buy it in unemployment-paralyzed New York. People starve in the streets against the background of stores selling a variety of foodstuffs.

At the same time, the US government tried to get rid of redundant foodstuffs, which vendors could not sell. Market rules were observed strictly: unsold goods should always be categorized as redundant and they could not be given away to the poor because it could cause damage to businesses. A variety of methods was used to destroy redundant food. They burnt crops, drowned them in the ocean or plowed 10 million hectares of harvesting fields.
“About 6.5 million pigs were killed at that time,” the researcher wrote.

The consequences of those policies were predictable, the author of the article wrote. “Here is what a child recollected about those years: “We changed our usual food for something for available. We used to eat bush leaves instead of cabbage. We ate frogs too. My mother and my older sister died during a year.” (Jack Griffin).”

So-called public works introduced by President Roosevelt became a salvation for a huge number of jobless and landless Americans. However, the salvation was only a phantom, Boris Borisov wrote. The works conducted under the aegis of the Public Works Administration and the Civil Works Administration were about building channels, roads or bridges in remote, wild and dangerous territories. Up to 3.3 million people were involved in those works at a time, whereas the total number of people amounted to 8.5 million, not to count prisoners.

“Conditions and death rate at those works are to be studied separately. A member of public works would make $30, and pay $25 of taxes from this amount. So a person could make only $5 for a month of hard work in malarial swamps.”

The conditions, under which people were working for food, could be compared to Stalin’s GULAG camp.

“The Public Works Administration (PWA) bore a striking resemblance to GULAG. The PWA was chaired by “American Beria,” the Secretary of Interior Affairs, Harold Ickes, who threw about two million people into camps for the unemployed youth,” Borisov wrote. “Harold LeClair Ickes (1874–1952) later interned USA’s ethnic Japanesein concentration camps. The first stage of the operation took only 72 hours (1941-1942).

“In 1940, the US population was supposed to make up at least 141.856 million people upon the preservation of previous demographic trends. As a matter of fact, the USA had the 131.409-strong population in 1940, of which only 3.054 million can be explained with changes in migration dynamics. Thus, 7.394,000 people simply do not exist as of 1940. There are no official arguments to explain the phenomenon,” Boris Borisov wrote.

It is worthy of note that modern-day Russian patriotic historians reject methods of research based on the general estimation of demographic losses. They believe that demographic processes are not linear and depend on a number of factors. Such historians think that victims of communism estimations made on the base of demographic research works by Stephan Kurt and Richard Pipes, which George Bush and Helen Bonner announced at the opening of Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation in Washington, are false.

On the other hand, these methods are widely used in contemporary science of history. Ukrainian historian Stanislav Kulchitsky used the method to calculate the number of victims of the Ukrainian Holodomor (famine), which was subsequently officially recognized. Parliaments of eleven countries that recognized Holodomor use those numbers in their research works. To crown it all, the US Congress and the European Union also use Kulchitsky’s numbers considering the problem.
 
we won't go out without a bang. we will make sure the entire world suffers with us. let's not forget we have the strongest military in the world and have enough nukes to blow up every single city on earth many times over. the decline of america will not be pretty for anyone, mark my words.
 
we won't go out without a bang. we will make sure the entire world suffers with us. let's not forget we have the strongest military in the world and have enough nukes to blow up every single city on earth many times over. the decline of america will not be pretty for anyone, mark my words.

you won't use nukes because then your 1% will lose their yachts, mansion and caviar lifestyle. if you go against them Kent State awaits.
 
we won't go out without a bang. we will make sure the entire world suffers with us. let's not forget we have the strongest military in the world and have enough nukes to blow up every single city on earth many times over. the decline of america will not be pretty for anyone, mark my words.

Are you ready for a bang in your hometown? I bet You ll find it amusing.
 
U.S & west is declining???? only in dreams of haters of west. i m not a supporter of U.S or west but i m also not blind in hate so much so that i can't see facts. it is right that few nations are rising on par with west but it does not mean west is declining.
 
The Roman Example / written by J. M. Lalley (excerpt)

Mr. Strausz-Hupé surmised that the purposeful neglect of classical languages and classical history in American schools is to make sure “that innocent minds shall not be troubled by the analogies lurking in the contemporary situation.” On second thought he decided that in pouring classical subjects down the Deweyite drain the educationists really wanted to flush out of their own minds those “disturbing allusions” that some chapters of Roman history offer to the crises and controversies of our own age. Whatever the motives, the correspondences are certainly there, and Strausz-Hupé was by no means the first to have recognized them. Just a dozen years ago there appeared a book called The Coming Caesars in America, a title startling enough, one would think, to have earned it some attention. I recall that a chapter or two from it was republished in the US. News and World Report, and a review appeared in a now defunct bilingual magazine called Western World; but the rest, as far as I am aware, was utter silence, which may again support Mr. Strausz-Hupé’s notion of a great Freudian plunger,” at work in the minds of editors as well as of schoolmasters. The author was a young Frenchman with the elegant name of Amaury de Riencourt, a devout disciple of Oswald Spengler and well practiced in the Spenglerian game of matching events, personalities, and social phenomena historically separated by several millenia. It was no trouble at all for M. de Riencourt to show that the American republic has been repeating with great precision, though perhaps at a much faster pace, the pattern of historical evolution of the Roman republic in the century or so that followed the last Punic War, or to draw the analogy between Mithridates Eupator of Pontus and Adolf Hitler and between those unmanageable Parthians of the Roman Middle East and the intractable Soviet Communists of our twentieth century. He could confidently identify Franklin Room velt as the modern Gaius Gracchus, could see in Harry Truman a gentler reincarnation of Gaius Marius, in Dwight Eisenhower a benevolent and unbloody Sulla, and even in the late General MacArthur the historical twin of Licinius Lucullus. One comforting difference, though—or so it seemed at the time—was this: whereas in Rome the transition from republic to empire had required a hundred years and more of assassinations, riots, civil wars, proscriptions, and wholesale massacres, here in the United States, because of our more flexible constitution and lack of an entrenched and powerful aristocracy, it would be accomplished peaceably and almost without being noticed, simply by continuing extensions of the federal executive power. But, alas, M. de Riencourt’s reading of the historical auspices seems not to have revealed what lay ahead in the way of incendiary insurrections in American cities or in Catilinarian behavior on the college campuses, in the streets, and even in courts of law.



 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom