What's new

Crisis deepens as another judge quits SC bench hearing poll delay case


Sep 26, 2018
Reaction score
United Kingdom
United Kingdom

After Justice Amin-Ud-Din Khan's recusal, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail on Friday also withdrew himself from the Supreme Court bench hearing the Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa election delay case making it the second time in consecutive days that the bench has been dissolved.

Initially, a five-member larger bench of the top court was formed on Monday to hear Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf's (PTI) plea against the delay in elections in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Punjab.

The initial bench comprised Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan, Justice Munib Akhtar, Justice Khan, and Justice Mandokhail. It held three hearings on the matter.

However, on Wednesday, an SC bench headed by Justice Qazi Faez Isa ordered the postponement of cases being heard under Article 184(3) of the Constitution till the amendments made in the Supreme Court Rules 1980 regarding the discretionary powers of the chief justice to form benches.

Justice Amin-Ud-Din Khan concurred with Justice Isa while Justice Shahid Waheed dissented with the majority order of 2-1 in the suo motu case regarding the grant of 20 marks to Hafiz-e-Quran students while seeking admission to MBBS/BDS Degree under Regulation 9(9) of the MBBS and BDS (Admissions, House Job and Internship) Regulations, 2018.

Consequently, on Thursday the bench hearing the election case was dissolved following Justice Khan's recusal in line with Justice Isa's order.

After the dissolution of the bench, the apex court announced that the bench would continue hearing the case without Justice Khan.

Disregarding of judgment​

But before the election case hearing was set to resume, the Supreme Court “disregarded” the judgment authored by Justice Isa through a circular issued by SC Registrar Ishrat Ali.

Circular issued by SC Registrar. — provided by reporter
Circular issued by SC Registrar. — provided by reporter
“The observations made in paras 11 to 22 and 26 to 28 of the majority judgment of two to one travel beyond the lis before the Court and invokes its suo motu jurisdiction,” observed CJP Umar Ata Bandial in the circular issued today.

It noted that the “unilateral assumption of judicial power” in such a manner violated the rule laid down by a five-member judgment.

“Such power is to be invoked by the Chief Justice on the recommendation of an Honourable Judge or a learned Bench of the Court on the basis of criteria laid down in Article 184(3) of the Constitution. The said majority judgment therefore disregards binding law laid down by a larger bench of the Court,” read the circular.

The recusal

When the bench assembled today, Attorney General for Pakistan Mansoor Usman Awan came on the rostrum to speak but CJP Bandial told him that Justice Mandokhail wanted to say something.

The judge, while recusing himself from hearing the case, remarked that he was awaiting the order after Justice Khan’s recusal from the case.

Crisis deepens as another judge quits SC bench hearing poll delay case

“I received the order at home. I had written a separate note on the order,” said Justice Mandokhail. He then asked AGP Awan to read out his note.

After the AGP read out the note written in the order, Justice Mandokhail remarked that he was a member of the bench but he was not consulted while the order was being written.

“I believe I am a misfit in the bench. I pray whichever bench is formed in this case gives a verdict that is acceptable to everyone,” said Justice Mandokhail. He prayed for his institution, adding that he and his fellow judges were bound to follow the Constitution.

“I wanted to say something yesterday as well, perhaps there was no need for advice from me while writing the judgment,” noted Justice Mandokhail. He added that the other three members of the bench did not find him “worthy” of giving advice.

After this, Justice Mandokhail tried speaking but was stopped by the CJP. He instead thanked the judge for his note.

“Whatever decision is made on the formation of the bench will be announced in the court in a while,” remarked CJP Bandial.

Later, the court announced that a three-member bench will resume the hearing at 2pm.
Just when you think we as a country cannot go further down, something else comes up and proves you wrong.

We need to coin another term for this country, banana republic is too kind of a word.
Very unfortunate the said judges have buckled under establishments pressure, once the assembles have been dissolved, constitution is crystal clear, Elections must be held within 90 days.
Nice to see judges standing up to the CJP, long overdue.
Nice to see judges standing up to the CJP, long overdue.

Standing up to c.j to postpone elections when the spirit of the democracy dictates otherwise ?

Justice Esa ,mandokhail and khan should be given standing ovation for blocking peoples fundamental rights citing constitutional technicalities.
Last edited:
This below attached scene of an Indian Flim look so much relevant to the situation of Behan Aliay and Uzma

Bhen Dar gai ... Bhen Dar gai
Full Court Bench
Consisting of Justice Shazeeb Khanzada,
Justice Ghareeda Farooqui,
Justice Najam Sethi,
Justice Sana Bacha and Justice Qayyum.

" Mr. Khata Tarr '



Top Bottom