Well going by their own indian logic, this would mean that Pakistan also has 10 warhead MIRV missiles!India is fully prepared to answer any Chinese missile. They have this "expert" to help them out.
View attachment 375151

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well going by their own indian logic, this would mean that Pakistan also has 10 warhead MIRV missiles!India is fully prepared to answer any Chinese missile. They have this "expert" to help them out.
View attachment 375151

Well going by their own indian logic, this would mean that Pakistan also has 10 warhead MIRV missiles!![]()
Indians never have anything called as logic. But they would surely make all Chinese missiles useless by proving them fake. Wait and watch.

Indians don't get tired of comparing themselves with china and telling the world how they've surpassed china in this and that but when they're shown the bamboo it's suddenly china vs usa.There goes Indian most reliable news site:
By testing missile with 10 nuclear warheads, is China preparing for a military showdown with US?
source: Unrecognized Site



Some Indians are living in stone ageR-36 and RS-28 ICBM might disagree with youThe DF-5C is now the most powerful ICBM of all time, that's why China will keep for a long time. Also, its liquid fuel will constantly get upgraded.
RS- 28 will only enter service in 2020.R-36 and RS-28 ICBM might disagree with you
True that, but DF-5C's deployment time is still unknown, and it is still at testing phase too. Some report says RS-28 became operational in 2016.RS- 28 will only enter service in 2020.
True that, but DF-5C's deployment time is still unknown, and it is still at testing phase too. Some report says RS-28 became operational in 2016.
Anyways, still the R-36 let alone RS-28 is more powerful than DF-5C. Nevertheless the DF-5C is a very formidable weapon in deterrence against enemy nuclear black mail, but one should respect the facts and do less useless boasting which became too common here on pdf.The fact, it successfully tested with ten MIRV shows its very near deployment.
Plus Russia is extremely low in military fund. They will view SSBN more important than ground ICBM. I doubt 2016-17, this will be operation.
DF-5C is a different beat compare to DF-5B. Its warhead increase from eight MIRV to ten MIRV.Anyways, still the R-36 let alone RS-28 is more powerful than DF-5C. Nevertheless the DF-5C is a very formidable weapon in deterrence against enemy nuclear black mail, but one should respect the facts and do less useless boasting which became too common in here on pdf.
R-36 and RS-28 ICBM might disagree with you
Anyways, still the R-36 let alone RS-28 is more powerful than DF-5C. Nevertheless the DF-5C is a very formidable weapon in deterrence against enemy nuclear black mail, but one should respect the facts and do less useless boasting which became too common here on pdf.
Well, RS-28 can be equipped with 10 to 24 MIRV, and R-36 can also be armed with 10 warheads starting from mod 4, both of them have more or less the double throw-weight than DF-5CDF-5C is a different beat compare to DF-5B. Its warhead increase from eight MIRV to ten MIRV.
The fact, it successfully tested with ten MIRV shows its very near deployment.
Plus Russia is extremely low in military fund. They will view SSBN more important than ground ICBM. I doubt 2016-17, this will be operation.
Well, RS-28 can be equipped with 10 to 24 MIRV, and R-36 can also be armed with 10 warheads starting from mod 4, both of them have more or less the double throw-weight than DF-5C
The RS-28 can also carry 10 heavy warheads or 20 light warheads, its payload and range are similar to the DF-5C and SS-18.
The only difference is that the RS-28 has the more improved modern liquid propellant technology compared to its predecessor SS-18.
The R-36 is not more powerful than the DF-5C, you should read more analysis from @Martian2 .
The DF-5C got thicker diameter than the R-36 with the modern liquid propellant technology. There is no reason to believe that the R-36 should be more powerful with a thinner diameter and a more primitive liquid propellant technology.