beijingwalker
ELITE MEMBER
- Nov 4, 2011
- 66,169
- -55
- Country
- Location
China refuses to give up ‘developing country’ status at WTO, despite US demands
China will refuse to give up the “special and differential treatment” it enjoys as a developing nation at the World Trade Organisation, in a rebuke to a US proposal that would pare back the privileges China and other nations enjoy on trade.
China is categorised as a developing country at the Geneva-based institution, which affords it “special and differential treatment”. This enables China to provide subsidies in agriculture and set higher barriers to market entry than more developed economies.
The dispute reflects a fundamental divide within the World Trade Organisation (WTO) that has threatened the future of the global multilateral trading system.
The United States has long complained
that too many WTO members – about two-thirds of all member nations – define themselves as “developing countries” to take advantage of the terms the status permits them to trade under.
US President Donald Trump has railed against the organisation, calling it “a catastrophe” and “a disaster”.
However, big trading countries such as China and India that the preferential treatment is an important cornerstone of the global trading system. China continues labelling itself “the world’s largest developing country”, even though it is now the world’s second biggest economy and the largest exporter.
Gao Feng, a spokesman for the Ministry of Commerce, said in a press conference on Thursday that China would stand by its position, even as Brazil has agreed to forgo the status in exchange for US support in joining the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), an influential intergovernmental economic organisation with 36 member countries.
“China’s position on WTO reform has been very clear. China is the largest developing country in the world,” Gao said.
“We do not shy away from our international responsibilities and are willing to assume obligations in the WTO that are compatible with our own economic development level and capabilities. In fact, we do the same and will continue to do this.”
“At the same time, we will work with other developing members to firmly uphold our fundamental rights and to voice our common voice and safeguard our development interests,” Gao added.
The US claims that current WTO rules go too far in allowing China to subsidise its industries, support state-owned firms and discriminate against foreign investors. The terms have helped foster problems such as the forced transfer of technology and theft of intellectual property theft, Washington claims.
At the Boao Forum for Asia in Hainan last week – billed as
China’s answer to the
World Economic Forum in Davos – Zhou Xiaochuan, the former governor at China’s central bank, acknowledged that some of the criticisms brought up by the US are valid.
However, he said there was also some misunderstanding from other
WTO members
regarding China’s trade practices.
“We have substantially reduced market distortions and unreasonable subsidies [in moving from a planned economy to a market economy], but because this is a process of transformation, it is necessary that it has taken many years, so some distortions will remain,” Zhou said on a panel discussion about WTO reform.
“The Chinese government is very willing to speed up the reform process to eliminate this distortion, so these distortions will eventually disappear. [The criticisms] may be caused by a misunderstanding,” Zhou said.
“We need to do some clarification work. China is a big country. In the process of implementation, there may be inconsistencies. The implementation at the local level may not be consistent, and local governments may have behaved inappropriately, but this does not represent the Chinese government’s stance,” he added.
China, India, South Africa and Venezuela have opposed a US proposal to reform the “special and differential treatment”, published earlier this year.
The four countries have already submitted a paper to the WTO saying that the self-classification of developing member status had been a long-standing practice and best serves the WTO’s objectives.
The joint letter also claims that many WTO rules have actually favoured the US and other developed countries, in the areas of agricultural support, textile quotas, and intellectual property rights protection under the WTO guidance.
https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-...give-developing-country-status-wto-despite-us
- China calls the special and differential treatment a ‘fundamental right’, saying it will not cede to Trump’s demands on World Trade Organisation reform
- China says it will team with other developing members, including India, South Africa and Venezuela, to win the battle over future of WTO
China will refuse to give up the “special and differential treatment” it enjoys as a developing nation at the World Trade Organisation, in a rebuke to a US proposal that would pare back the privileges China and other nations enjoy on trade.
China is categorised as a developing country at the Geneva-based institution, which affords it “special and differential treatment”. This enables China to provide subsidies in agriculture and set higher barriers to market entry than more developed economies.
The dispute reflects a fundamental divide within the World Trade Organisation (WTO) that has threatened the future of the global multilateral trading system.
The United States has long complained
that too many WTO members – about two-thirds of all member nations – define themselves as “developing countries” to take advantage of the terms the status permits them to trade under.
US President Donald Trump has railed against the organisation, calling it “a catastrophe” and “a disaster”.
However, big trading countries such as China and India that the preferential treatment is an important cornerstone of the global trading system. China continues labelling itself “the world’s largest developing country”, even though it is now the world’s second biggest economy and the largest exporter.
Gao Feng, a spokesman for the Ministry of Commerce, said in a press conference on Thursday that China would stand by its position, even as Brazil has agreed to forgo the status in exchange for US support in joining the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), an influential intergovernmental economic organisation with 36 member countries.
“China’s position on WTO reform has been very clear. China is the largest developing country in the world,” Gao said.
“We do not shy away from our international responsibilities and are willing to assume obligations in the WTO that are compatible with our own economic development level and capabilities. In fact, we do the same and will continue to do this.”
“At the same time, we will work with other developing members to firmly uphold our fundamental rights and to voice our common voice and safeguard our development interests,” Gao added.
The US claims that current WTO rules go too far in allowing China to subsidise its industries, support state-owned firms and discriminate against foreign investors. The terms have helped foster problems such as the forced transfer of technology and theft of intellectual property theft, Washington claims.
At the Boao Forum for Asia in Hainan last week – billed as
China’s answer to the
World Economic Forum in Davos – Zhou Xiaochuan, the former governor at China’s central bank, acknowledged that some of the criticisms brought up by the US are valid.
However, he said there was also some misunderstanding from other
WTO members
regarding China’s trade practices.
“We have substantially reduced market distortions and unreasonable subsidies [in moving from a planned economy to a market economy], but because this is a process of transformation, it is necessary that it has taken many years, so some distortions will remain,” Zhou said on a panel discussion about WTO reform.
“The Chinese government is very willing to speed up the reform process to eliminate this distortion, so these distortions will eventually disappear. [The criticisms] may be caused by a misunderstanding,” Zhou said.
“We need to do some clarification work. China is a big country. In the process of implementation, there may be inconsistencies. The implementation at the local level may not be consistent, and local governments may have behaved inappropriately, but this does not represent the Chinese government’s stance,” he added.
China, India, South Africa and Venezuela have opposed a US proposal to reform the “special and differential treatment”, published earlier this year.
The four countries have already submitted a paper to the WTO saying that the self-classification of developing member status had been a long-standing practice and best serves the WTO’s objectives.
The joint letter also claims that many WTO rules have actually favoured the US and other developed countries, in the areas of agricultural support, textile quotas, and intellectual property rights protection under the WTO guidance.
https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-...give-developing-country-status-wto-despite-us
