China maps J&K as its territory: Should Modi ask Ansari to end Beijing trip?

[Areesh]

It is amusing taht you think hiding antagonistic elements under your nuclear umbrella can keep your interests safe.

I just mentioned nukes as the last resort. Or else to defend AJK and GB we don't even need them.

 

[axisofevil]

common dude do u seriously think we can get those land back or they can take land from us, why don't we just accept the reality on ground, we cant get aksai chin & they can't get arunachal & pakistan can't gey IOK & we can't get Azad Kashmir, no matter what we do, why it's so hard for people on both side of the border to understand

Tibet was taken over 50 yrs ago. A few weeks ago, Crimea was taken over by Russia. Ever read a history book?

 

[Dem!god]

LOL. When you would go for this "reality" we would shove our missiles right on your face that would haunt you and your generations for years to come.



Your countrymen are largely delusional. Leave them.

and what do u think other country missiles are just for showpiece...
if u will attack u will get the same response...

 

[Areesh]

and what do u think other country missiles are just for showpiece...
if u will attack u will get the same response...

Well that's what you should before doing anything stupid with AJK or GB. Our missiles as you said are not showpiece. Even though we might not need them altogether.

 

[nik141991]

It doesn't mean you give up. Did China give up on Hong Kong just because British ruled it or Macau because Portuguese ruled it? They waited for the time when they could simply push these states around, while working in the background quietly, building themselves up.

Today, no western power can think of taking land from China.

That's smart working.

I just don't understand the give-up pooh pooh nature of your folks from the plains. You give up so easily.



It is amusing taht you think hiding antagonistic elements under your nuclear umbrella can keep your interests safe.

im from himachal dude & sorry to say i don't delude myself, u cant change reality on ground no matter how hard u try & for how long u try

 

[Rahul9090]

LOL. Then wait for that technology. Till then we would work on some other technologies. By the way I love the source for you dream. BJP leaders. rofl:

you can believe what you want sir lets just wait for the day ,and we shall find out

 

[Areesh]

you can believe what you want sir lets just for the day and we shall find out

So have you developed that super dooper technology or not???

 

[Dem!god]

Well that's what you should before doing anything stupid with AJK or GB. Our missiles as you said are not showpiece. Even though we might not need them altogether.

lol...then what will u do...
i don't think in a war ur military can withstand for more than a fortnight....atleast now now...

 

[Areesh]

lol...then what will u do...
i don't think in a war ur military can withstand for more than a fortnight....atleast now now...

Among nuclear nation wars never go beyond a few days genius. So it isn't about capability it is the hard fact for you.

You would have suffered enough casualties in that period so that you would have no choice but to end the fight.

 

[Dem!god]

im from himachal dude & sorry to say i don't delude myself, u cant change reality on ground no matter how hard u try & for how long u try

what if china breaks off....
i know usA is trying hard to do that.....
u never know how future will unfold....man can only work and hold intact its dream....leave rest to the future

 

[Jlaw]

It doesn't mean you give up. Did China give up on Hong Kong just because British ruled it or Macau because Portuguese ruled it? They waited for the time when they could simply push these states around, while working in the background quietly, building themselves up.

Today, no western power can think of taking land from China.

That's smart working.

I just don't understand the give-up pooh pooh nature of your folks from the plains. You give up so easily.



It is amusing taht you think hiding antagonistic elements under your nuclear umbrella can keep your interests safe.

Hk and Macao is different. It was a lease with limited time on the lease.

 

[nik141991]

Tibet was taken over 50 yrs ago. A few weeks ago, Crimea was taken over by Russia. Ever read a history book?

Russia taking on Ukraine is completely different from china taking on India & vice-versa, it not David vs Goliath, both countries are not stupid like pakistan to risk their trade & economy

 

[Dem!god]

Among nuclear nation wars never go beyond a few days genius. So it isn't about capability it is the hard fact for you.

You would have suffered enough casualties in that period so that you would have no choice but to end the fight.

lol.... just in previous post u said we won't use missile....it won't reach up to that point...
and now nukes... lol....how will u deliver it without missiles..??

and if u will use nukes...we too will use..and u know giving the geography and population...there will be no Pakistan after nuke war...

 

[Areesh]

lol.... just in previous post u said we won't use missile....it won't reach up to that point...
and now nukes... lol....how will u deliver it without missiles..??

and if u will use nukes...we too will use..and u know giving the geography and population...there will be no Pakistan after nuke war...

When did I say we would use nukes imbecile. I said war won't go beyond a few days as international community and UN would jump in to stop this nonsense started by India.

There is no need of ballistic missiles or nukes to save AJK or GB. Just a few CMs or artellary and armor backed by PAF would be enough to inflict enough damages to you in a few days war and to withhold the Indian insanity. First try to comprehend the post Bharati.

 

[SAMEET]

you can believe what you want sir lets just wait for the day ,and we shall find out

Pity him he thinks that BJP is hindu supremist party ! but even you know any pakistani party BTW CM of punjab ? I know only one party its PPP pakistan people party they rest are ARMY ! kayani says yes means yes ! kayani says no means no !

Among nuclear nation wars never go beyond a few days genius. So it isn't about capability it is the hard fact for you.

You would have suffered enough casualties in that period so that you would have no choice but to end the fight.

First have No first use policy then talk about morality of handling nuclear weapon !