What's new

China, India competing in South Asia: Pakistani daily

CONNAN

SENIOR MEMBER
Feb 23, 2009
3,381
0
2,923
Country
India
Location
United States
upload_2015-2-23_20-24-36.jpeg


The competition between India and China to gain diplomatic one-upmanship in South Asia, from Sri Lanka to Maldives, exposes a strategic necessity, a leading Pakistani daily said Monday.

According to the article in Dawn by Zarrar Khuhro, the civil nuclear deal between India and Sri Lanka, signed during Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena's visit to India last week capped efforts by India to roll back Chinese influence on the island nation, with the previous government in Sri Lanka having made it a point to move closer to China.

"Under Rajapaksa, Colombo had increased defence cooperation with China, which was also funding the construction of a port in Colombo. In addition to this, China has, over the last nine years or so, provided Sri Lanka with substantial soft loans largely for infrastructure projects," Khuhro said.

He noted that for Modi, the civil nuclear deal with Sri Lanka was being billed as his first "big ticket achievement" in the field of diplomacy.

"The same kind of tug of war can be seen in the Maldives, where China and India are vying to develop a crucial military port," the article said.

Khuhro pointed out that when Male's main water plant burned down last December, causing a severe drinking water crisis, India immediately responded by sending supplies of drinking water to the Maldives. Not to be left behind, China also despatched naval and air vessels loaded with drinking water.

"The answer as to why China wants to improve relations with Sri Lanka and the Maldives lies in what a 2005 US report called the 'String of Pearls' - a series of naval bases meant to secure China's lifeline," the article said.

China wants to secure the naval trade routes that stretch from China's eastern coast all the way around southeast Asia, through the Indian Ocean and to points beyond, in the Persian Gulf and Africa, Khuhro explained.

"China itself prefers the term 'Maritime silk route', claiming that all Beijing wants is access to these waterways and not naval bases per se," the article said.

The article noted that this might be seen by some Indian strategists as a Chinese attempt to encircle India in conjunction with Pakistan.

"China's own concerns are larger, and the nightmare of a hostile US (currently in the midst of its Asian pivot) choking off China's lifeline looms large," the article said, adding that Obama's visit to India last month magnified such fears.

"It seems fairly apparent that the US' new strategic focus will be seen in India as an opportunity to create an alliance aimed at countering and possibly containing China," Khuhro said.

He said that it was no coincidence that while Obama was in India, Pakistan army chief Raheel Sharif was in China and that "there can in fact be no clearer signal of which strategic orbit Pakistan has chosen."

However, there is little choice in the matter for Pakistan, and its relations with India make the idea of China and India competing to woo Pakistan a laughable one, Khuhro said, adding that China offered Pakistan a way to leverage its geographical position into economic gain and security.

"Pakistan China Economic Corridor (PCEC) offers China an alternate route to the Arabian Sea, reducing its dependence on the maritime route. It also links the underdeveloped western parts of China with the global economy," the article said.

It noted that this was crucial for China, which tended to believe that prosperity settled most arguments, and felt that if the western regions were developed, it would take the wind out of the sails of the Uighur rebels.

For Pakistan, "the areas around the route of PCEC will no doubt benefit economically, and give the residents and locals a stake in peace and development," the article said.

China, India competing in South Asia: Pakistani daily | Business Standard News
 
We should take the competition to South East Asia also.

And do what? Make laughing stock of ourselves?

Before we take on any competition, we need to increase our profile. The only two countries with whom we have something serious are Singapore and Malaysia. Our trade with Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand and Myanmar are laughable. Cambodia and Laos are totally dependent on China for their survival and economic sustenance.

While this is being spoken about in our neighbourhood, our government is busy dancing the conga with Bangladesh instead of dealing seriously with southeast Asian navies and governments.

Why are we not serious about immediate neighbourhood of Southeast Asia is what shocks me.
 
He said that it was no coincidence that while Obama was in India, Pakistan army chief Raheel Sharif was in China and that "there can in fact be no clearer signal of which strategic orbit Pakistan has chosen."



The clear signal of Pakistan and China's cooperation goes back DECADES.
 
And do what? Make laughing stock of ourselves?

Before we take on any competition, we need to increase our profile. The only two countries with whom we have something serious are Singapore and Malaysia. Our trade with Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand and Myanmar are laughable. Cambodia and Laos are totally dependent on China for their survival and economic sustenance.

While this is being spoken about in our neighbourhood, our government is busy dancing the conga with Bangladesh instead of dealing seriously with southeast Asian navies and governments.

Why are we not serious about immediate neighbourhood of Southeast Asia is what shocks me.

We are already engaging in south east Asia, check the oil exploration deal or defence deals with Vietnam, small start, but at least a beginning.
 
We should take the competition to South East Asia also.
Your navy can barely leave home port without blowing up or colliding with a fishing boat :lol:

You already have, "Look East Policy", initiated by PM Rao, continued by Vajpayee and Singh.
Indians talked about look east decades for decades but got nowhere while China never declared string of pearls but now we have a circle of pearls. Guess who is in the middle of the circle? One guess :)
 
Indians talked about look east decades for decades but got nowhere while China never declared string of pearls but now we have a circle of pearls. Guess who is in the middle of the circle? One guess :)

Well,

1. India entered Vietnam
2. Singapore-Indian relations are high, even allowing SAF to be stationed in India
3. ASEAN, APEC, & various other Organizations
4. Economic integration in the region is second to China, in some cases China is second.
5. Leap-froged from SE Asia to S.Korea & Japan as strategic allies

Look East wasn't just 'Hey we're going to counter Chinese influence in SE Asia" but a stepping stone to NE Asia.

While China is propping up weak States that have failed diplomatically, India has States with political clout.

Btw, just because a country doesn't officially state a policy doesn't mean it doesn't have it.
 
Well,

1. India entered Vietnam
2. Singapore-Indian relations are high, even allowing SAF to be stationed in India
3. ASEAN, APEC, & various other Organizations
4. Economic integration in the region is second to China, in some cases China is second.
5. Leap-froged from SE Asia to S.Korea & Japan as strategic allies

Look East wasn't just 'Hey we're going to counter Chinese influence in SE Asia" but a stepping stone to NE Asia.

While China is propping up weak States that have failed diplomatically, India has States with political clout.

Btw, just because a country doesn't officially state a policy doesn't mean it doesn't have it.
I hope the above is sarcastic because in reality India has more poor than subsaharan Africa and most of the population lack basic sanitation. One powerful strike from China and New Delhi ceases to function immediately. Look at the way China humiliated Modi at Chumar in 2014.
 
I hope the above is sarcastic because in reality India has more poor than subsaharan Africa and most of the population lack basic sanitation. One powerful strike from China and New Delhi ceases to function immediately. Look at the way China humiliated Modi at Chumar in 2014.

So your response to slow political coup is:

"India has more poor than subsaharan Africa and most of the population lack basic sanitation."

The Chinese had more soldiers than the free world did in North Korea, I guess they should have taken over the entire Korean Peninsula.

Did you sense my sarcasm in the above?
 
We are already engaging in south east Asia, check the oil exploration deal or defence deals with Vietnam, small start, but at least a beginning.

Only now. Mind you, we are 10 years too late.

But unless we become major exporters of finished goods, there is little we can claim in terms of dominance in the region's influence. For that we need to jack up our innovations, research & manufacturing... First by changing the way higher education is done in India.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Back
Top Bottom