What's new

China has set a miraculous example in eradicating poverty, says a Pakistani expert

There is a assumption that low borth rates equals decline. That is false. It assumes the technolofy is stagnant. It is not. The use of importation of cheap labour stagnates innovation and developmemt. It is form of luddite economics. If no cheap labour is imported it will lead to price increase and that will incentivize hi-tech solutions. My son tells me in Japan and South Korea he saw increased use of robots in daily life as opposed to UK. For instance at Seoul airport there were robots that guided passengers to where they wanted to go. Point being is technology will get a boost and it will plug the need of cheap labour. I think this is where Chinese will go instead of importing millions of me and @war&peace to give them lectures of virtues of Islam.

@OsmanAli98




So true. Africa has the highest birth rate in the world yet they are the most backward continent.
 
They may have shifted from one child to two child do you understand the male to female ratio there, there are more men than women thanks to Chinese tradition of favoring boys over girls how tf will breeding occur if they are very limited options of Females on the market why you think Chinese men are going to Vietnam, Russia/Ukraine, and SEA for brides besides they have gotten use to low birth rates
Well that's their internal problem and I'm sure they will find a solution for that as well.
 
Erdogan would get raped for being a westoxfied cnut walking around with his gora clothes, gora culture and Istanbul looking like a sin city floating on free sex and alcohol.
What a stupid post, as usual...
This is a picture of some school in some village in Pakistan... and there are thousands of such schools and millions of children wearing this uniform daily to school and none is getting killed for that

iu

But for sure they wont be letting Pakistanis en masse mass migrate to fill cheap labor jobs for sure
Pakistani don't want to go there, they will get jobs in Pakistan..
But it seems you're planning to move there
 
Half Truth but geopolitics wise Liaqat ALI Khan putting us intto Washingtons arms was big mistake
Not foreign relations development wise
Army never directly ruled Pakistan even in martial law days politicians were running Pakistan
 
What a stupid post, as usual...
This is a picture of some school in some village in Pakistan... and there are thousands of such schools and millions of children wearing this uniform daily to school and none is getting killed for that

iu


Pakistani don't want to go there, they will get jobs in Pakistan..
But it seems you're planning to move there

Nope I would love to learn the language but live there oh helllll nooo good for seeing and staying short term I wanna be travel nomad tbh

Not foreign relations development wise
Army never directly ruled Pakistan even in martial law days politicians were running Pakistan

GHQ runs the foreign policy mostly tho
 
I was talking about poverty development etc
Who cares about foreign policy pro India lifafas and politicians say army runs foreign policy

Who the f cares everyone seems to make it a fuss the Army runs the country I dont see it as a problem when it comes to foreign policy it hurt us doemstic wise becuase the Yanks wanted the Soviets dead why not use fundamenaltalist groups and then ditch Pakistan when needed
 
In a alternative universe imagine Pakistan 1948 has Mao as the Quaid-e-Millat rather than Fisty Liaquat then see how things would have pan out -

  • purging of desi culture
  • purging of all mullahs and no diesel mullahs either. All wiped out
  • all madaris closed down and talibs sent to concentration camps or to clean up the country
  • all elites and social orders wiped out
  • all gender bias wiped out replaced with female emancipation
  • class/tribal/caste/biraderi networks erased
  • universal secular education across the board
  • free medical care across the board
  • adoption of western political philosophies
  • adoption of western dress
  • traditions wiped out
  • etc
Pakistan today would be emerging as a regional superpower. But alas ....
The guy failed in everything except keeping China together under brute force .... Not only millions were killed millions more starved and then millions more died in famine. Only that China had way too many people to be permanently rocked by his actions. It was only after him when China changed its course from total communism to a mix of capitalism and socialism that China managed to reach where it did... in fact communist capitalism became more efficient as state controlled and continues to control every aspect of public life. The decision making was also quicker and more swift bringing change in much shorter time spans than previously achieved in the west.
 
Mao was a great general that won the civil war and united the country. He was a awful leader tho as his reform plans all failed. China really didn't start growing until after his reign.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom