Good pics for propaganda purposes..
But it does not hide the truth of hundreds of Indian soldiers and people u massacred when they surrendered...
Good choice of words for propaganda purposes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Good pics for propaganda purposes..
But it does not hide the truth of hundreds of Indian soldiers and people u massacred when they surrendered...
Good choice of words for propaganda purposes.

I wonder if he has any proof of those claims that he made.![]()
thats unfair british were with super weepaons and rifles where as chines had no fancy weaponsJust for quantity,differenc is that British soldier with advanced weapons and Chinese soldiers with bravery.
I wonder which brave Indian soul would be available to film or snap the events when they are busy "surrendering" or being "massacred".
On 10 October, an Indian Punjabi patrol of 50 troops to Yumtso La were met by an emplaced Chinese position of some 1,000 soldiers. Indian troops were in no position for battle, as Yumtso La was 16,000 feet (4,900 m) above sea level and Kaul did not plan on having artillery support for the troops. The Chinese troops opened fire on the Indians under their belief that they were north of the McMahon Line. The Indians were surrounded by Chinese positions which used mortar fire. However, they managed to hold off the first Chinese assault, inflicting heavy casualties.
Indians learnt its mistake of trusting Chinese...Never will 1962 be repeated
Then you backstabbed us again with the Forward Policy, all while singing that strange Hindi phrase about bhai bhais.Yeah 1000 soldiers against 50 !!!
Also check out Battle at Rezang La!!
how Chinese sent more than 5000 soldiers to fight 123 indian soldiers....Gr8 brave Chinese soldiers..
Indians learnt its mistake of trusting Chinese...Never will 1962 be repeated

thats unfair british were with super weepaons and rifles where as chines had no fancy weapons
anyway Indians were use to fight with enemy 7 times smaller both in number and military weapon quality and still lose , it was bound to loss from china, even from there boarder force..it has/had over estimated itself
the same is true today
We are all praising the brave soldiers,forget it is true or not.Yeah 1000 soldiers against 50 !!!
Also check out Battle at Rezang La!!
how Chinese sent more than 5000 soldiers to fight 123 indian soldiers....Gr8 brave Chinese soldiers..
Indians learnt its mistake of trusting Chinese...Never will 1962 be repeated
Are you playing Spartans?
Spare us your propaganda and provide real credible third party sources to support your stupendous claims.![]()
I would ask u to do the same..not CPC provided videos where a Chinese nurse is feeding a India POW..probably tortured...

I think China should have kept arunchal since you guys won it in Battle. And the people there look more like tibetans than
Indians.
And the area would have also given you guys direct border with almost all of Indian NE states.

you might as well saying 1million against 50 bharatis, that is more bollywood style vvetDreamsYeah 1000 soldiers against 50 !!!
Also check out Battle at Rezang La!!
how Chinese sent more than 5000 soldiers to fight 123 indian soldiers....Gr8 brave Chinese soldiers..
Indians learnt its mistake of trusting Chinese...Never will 1962 be repeated
you might as well saying 1million against 50 bharatis, that is more bollywood style vvetDreams
I would ask u to do the same..not CPC provided videos where a Chinese nurse is feeding a India POW..probably tortured...
". So this is "probably" the psychological torture you are talking about?Are you playing Spartans?
Spare us your propaganda and provide real credible third party sources to support your stupendous claims.![]()