Capability to neutralise enemy satellites proved

[Firemaster]

be ready for trolls!

trolls are coming bcos article has mistake line which states 700 km altitude of chinese abm

 

[Kinetic]

is this technology developed 1st time in the world (by india)
pls provide a link if any

Not sure about other countries but US must have this, you know, 'US has everything'!! lol

Jet vanes are also important for AAD's initial maneuvers.

 

[dbc]

is this technology developed 1st time in the world (by india)
pls provide a link if any

No its not a first for India, even the Iranians are rumored to have developed jet vanes using Silicon and Carbon.

 

[angeldemon_007]

No its not a first for India, even the Iranians are rumored to have developed jet vanes using Silicon and Carbon.

It is rumored that Iran has nuclear weapons also, but not proven yet. Some even claims IRAN possess ICBM, but no proof yet. Don't believe in rumors, look what happened when last time you believed.

 

[tanlixiang28776]

Only the U.S., Russia, France, Israel and India have the capability to put in place a ballistic missile defence shield. China is still developing it. It conducted an anti-ballistic missile test on January 11, 2010. The target missile, launched from Xichang, was intercepted and destroyed at an altitude of 700 km by a KT-2 variant missile that took off from near Korla in Xinjiang province.

quote

Could someone clear things up for me.

Why are we placed below France, Russia, Israel, and India when they do not have this capability. Just shoddy reporting?

Besides US only China has had a midcourse interception with a KKV extro-atmospherically.

We have the second most advanced ABM program in the world. Why don't we have the capability to put in a ballistic missile defense shield? Money, Need, time?

 

[angeldemon_007]

Only the U.S., Russia, France, Israel and India have the capability to put in place a ballistic missile defence shield.

No France does not have this capability. India is developing a multi-tier defense shield just like US-Israel JV.

 

[tanlixiang28776]

No France does not have this capability. India is developing a multi-tier defense shield just like US-Israel JV.

That was quoted from the article. They also say China does not have capability despite being the second country to get a midcourse interception extro atmospheric KKV. It was also at 250 Km not 700Km. This article reeks of poor quality.

China already has terminal phase ABM systems in place like the HQ 9 in large numbers. Now its just testing midcourse, successfully and with KKVs I might add.

 

[BlueDot_in_Space]

That was quoted from the article. They also say China does not have capability despite being the second country to get a midcourse interception extro atmospheric KKV. It was also at 250 Km not 700Km. This article reeks of poor quality.

China already has terminal phase ABM systems in place like the HQ 9 in large numbers. Now its just testing midcourse, successfully and with KKVs I might add.

HQ9 has limited anti-ballistic capability. How many trial tests of HQ9 involved hitting a ballistic missile??

 

[tallboy123]

That was quoted from the article. They also say China does not have capability despite being the second country to get a midcourse interception extro atmospheric KKV. It was also at 250 Km not 700Km. This article reeks of poor quality.

China already has terminal phase ABM systems in place like the HQ 9 in large numbers. Now its just testing midcourse, successfully and with KKVs I might add.

can u show me a video of the ABM test,its test parameters...how many testes were conducted and how many were succesful and when was the last test conducted.....???

 

[faithfulguy]

If we can hit ICBM out in the space which is traveling in high speeds...it would be easy to hit a satellite.....

Next test would be of PDV,travels in Hypersonic and can hit target at 150km altitude with KKV mechanism..
waiting for that test

I do not believe that India was able to hit an ICBM before. India do not even possess ICBM so it would not be able to test hitting an ICBM. It can simulate hitting an ICBM in terms of trajectory at the end of terminal phase even with a short range missile but other variables such as income speed, maneuverability and decoys would be difficult to emulate.

 

[kingdurgaking]

That was quoted from the article. They also say China does not have capability despite being the second country to get a midcourse interception extro atmospheric KKV. It was also at 250 Km not 700Km. This article reeks of poor quality.

China already has terminal phase ABM systems in place like the HQ 9 in large numbers. Now its just testing midcourse, successfully and with KKVs I might add.

is HQ-9 is type of SAM? ... i really doubt S-300 models can intercept Ballistic missiles .... it is absolutely impossible for them to take war heads which are small coming at Mach7 & above speed especially in terminal phase.. further BMD algorithms are much complex than tracking fighter jet targets.. though it seems trajectory tracking are simple.. but it is not as simple as we think... you need high power super computers and processors to execute such complex algorithms..

 

[kingdurgaking]

I do not believe that India was able to hit an ICBM before. India do not even possess ICBM so it would not be able to test hitting an ICBM. It can simulate hitting an ICBM in terms of trajectory at the end of terminal phase even with a short range missile but other variables such as income speed, maneuverability and decoys would be difficult to emulate.

right now India doesnt posses.. but it eventually will do.... Though the software algorithms might be tweeked little... it is the hardware that is a constraint now.. thats why PDV & ADV a new defence shield is put in place.. these are developed to hit in Mid course phase before the decoy or the MIRV are actually deployed..

 

[tallboy123]

I do not believe that India was able to hit an ICBM before. India do not even possess ICBM so it would not be able to test hitting an ICBM. It can simulate hitting an ICBM in terms of trajectory at the end of terminal phase even with a short range missile but other variables such as income speed, maneuverability and decoys would be difficult to emulate.

Is 6000Km Ballistic missile a ICBM...?????or not..????

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agni-V

"You can reduce the payload and (further) increase the range of Agni-V" Saraswat(DRDO chief) told the Reuters in Feb 2010

 

[faithfulguy]

right now India doesnt posses.. but it eventually will do.... Though the software algorithms might be tweeked little... it is the hardware that is a constraint now.. thats why PDV & ADV a new defence shield is put in place.. these are developed to hit in Mid course phase before the decoy or the MIRV are actually deployed..

One of your country man mentioned that India is developing THAAD that would target ICBM up to 5000KM. However, 5000KM is not a real ICBM, this range is IRBM range missile. And THAAD is a terminal phase ABM for missiles of this range. True mid course interceptors are only for real ICBMs. I do not believe that its practical to create a mid course ABM if the missile is just a IRBM as there might not be enough time to do an interception. Something like THAAD would be more practical for India.

 

[faithfulguy]

Is 6000Km Ballistic missile a ICBM...?????or not..????

This would be a very limited range ballistic missile. Typically, ICBM are usually move 10000KM or more. Allow countries like US to hit Russia and China for for these countries to hit US. But India has no need for this kind of missile. As I mentioned before, India should focus on developing THAAD instead of worry about the designation of the missle such as if its ICBM or IRBM. Unless India plans to take on the US, there is no need for ICBM.