What's new

British looted $45 trillion from India in today’s value : Jaishankar

Zapper

SENIOR MEMBER
May 9, 2019
2,283
-28
2,378
Country
India
Location
United States
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has asserted India suffered “humiliation” for two centuries under colonial rule and quoted a study stating that the wealth British took from India was close to $45 trillion in today’s monetary value.

“India had two centuries of humiliation by the West in its predatory form it came to India in the mid-18th century. An economic study tried to estimate how much British took out of India, it ended up at a number of $45 trillion in today’s value,” Jaishankar stated while delivering an address at noted think tank Atlantic Council in Washington DC on Tuesday.
6_img131019214440.jpg

Jaishankar also called for managing Indo-US divergences over India’s approaches to Iran and Russia. "...the task before us, if we are to move in this direction is, one of course, to strengthen our convergences and there are issues today, very obvious issues to work together, issues like counter-terrorism, issues like maritime security, issues like connectivity. But there will also be divergences and I think part of the challenge would be to manage those. Lot of those would arise in third country situations like Russia or Iran."


During his address, Jaishankar shed new light on the constantly evolving and dynamic relationship between India, greater South Asia, and the Western world. The growth of Indian economic influence and emerging multi-polarity of the global economic system underscore a new balance in which “the West needs India, but India also needs the West.”

Earlier, in his opening remarks, Jaishankar asserted that a new, more positive and mutually beneficial compact is forming between what he terms “New India” and the Western world. He argued that a “global rebalancing” of political and economic power is underway, and that Western countries should recognize and accept the growing influence of developing countries such as India.

He pointed to the growing importance of the G-20 instead of G-7 meetings is evidence of this broader structural change in global geopolitics and of the rapid emergence of a multipolar geopolitical order.

Dr. Irfan Nooruddin, director of the South Asia Center, began the moderated discussion by asking what the implications of seemingly warm relations between US President Donald Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi were for the US-India bilateral relationship in the face of wide-ranging divergences on trade and regulatory approaches.

Mark Linscott, senior non-resident Fellow at the South Asia Center, inquired about the prospect of a US-India trade agreement being finalised in the coming weeks. Ambassador Omar Samad asked about Indian participation in the Afghan peace process and how that relates to future India-Pakistan-Afghanistan relations

https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...ays-value-jaishankar/articleshow/71426353.cms
 
counter-terrorism

How have India helped US in counter terrorism? Trump asked Modi to help them out in Afghanistan and he backed out. And now US eyes are set on Iran to for another counter terrorism war.

Unfortunately for India, Pakistan isn't hub of terrorism no matter how many militants we send to IoK.
 
It is a huge amount of money. India shall attack UK, to get back this money.:lol:

How have India helped US in counter terrorism? Trump asked Modi to help them out in Afghanistan and he backed out.

You are mistaken. Trump acknowledged that Modi built a library in Afghanistan, to counter terrorism.:lol:
 
It is a huge amount of money. India shall attack UK, to get back this money.:lol:



You are mistaken. Trump acknowledged that Modi built a library in Afghanistan, to counter terrorism.:lol:

West is getting tired of war on terror and India's days of using that for crimes in IoK are coming to an end.
 
Pakistan should claim one sixth of that.

7.5 Trillion Dollars will come handy in case Britain agrees to return.
Pakistanis are real successors of the Muslim rule and hence claim everything.. there was no Gangadesh before Aug 15, 1947.
 
I don't get how the **** the so-called indian leaders/representatives/spokes personnels don't get the basic concept that- no British no India. In no way the North east or many states in the southern parts of current india would have agreed to be part of the Indian union if not for the British influence.
 
but then again didn't nizam help the brits, didn't marathas helped the brits, didn't sikhs and punjabis and other indians helped the brits in defeating other indians who had almost freed india in the war of independence, didn't gandhi wait for decades so that the british leave peacefully? didn't hindus and muslims fight etc

and now what about indians jumping on nizam winning 35 million pounds

indians/south asians have looted indians/south asians.

regards
 
While we are on the topic of British rule I recommend the book by Pakistani historian Ilhan Niaz called "State During the Raj (2019)" to both the Indians & Pakistanis ... & Bangladeshis, if they prefer it.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom