RescueRanger
PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
To defeat this enemy you must first cut off the head of the snake. That is a difficult task.but people still sympathies with those who carrying out these attacks, instead of Martyrs of Armed Forces.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
To defeat this enemy you must first cut off the head of the snake. That is a difficult task.but people still sympathies with those who carrying out these attacks, instead of Martyrs of Armed Forces.
Who are you alluding to the head of snake?To defeat this enemy you must first cut off the head of the snake. That is a difficult task.
Whilst I have no love lost for Afghanistan taliban, this is just the sort of knee jerk reaction the enemy wants. To drag Pakistan into a regional protracted conflict destabilising the country further ahead of elections and then come the calls to “secure Pakistani nukes”.Kabul must burn!
Bahi jan the snakes in our own house. The ones with very long beards and stomachs full of Halwa.Who are you alluding to the head of snake?
Just imagine, if Khalistanis attacked IAF Amritsar AFS, how much randi rona we would have to endure from pajeets. Not only would their military risk a nuclear war, but their entire civilian society (regardless of occupation, political orientation, caste, religion, or race) in India and abroad would unite to peddle anti Pakistan narrative and lobby against Pakistan in international forums.I have made list of attacks on paf,pn installations. Lost count and it was horrific.
IMO all started 10 August 1999, with Pn Breguet Atlantic shotdown by iaf mig 21 bison during kargil. Paf sat looking at that time.
Paf restored some lost respect for? 27 Feb 2019 shooting down 2+1 iaf during PMIK.
Since then Pakistan in abyss, with bajwa doctrine ruling supreme.
PTI has to be taught a lesson like AL.
SIPRI or even some human rights ngo might have a list of number of terror attacks in Pakistan in last 4 years...they are wayyyyyy too many.
Tells standard of military.
Some semi professionals in this forum still trust them.
I have to agree with your latter post, deport all Afghans. Those with children born here can be considered for naturalisation if they surrender their afghan nationality, those who are waiting for their visas to be processed for travel to western counties can stay provided the UNHCR and their new adopted countries provide assurances and the rest can return to Afghanistan.Just imagine, if Khalistanis attacked IAF Amritsar AFS, how much randi rona we would have to endure from pajeets. Not only would their military risk a nuclear war, but their entire civilian society (regardless of occupation, political orientation, caste, religion, or race) in India and abroad would unite to peddle anti Pakistan narrative and lobby against Pakistan in international forums.
But TTP has literally walked into Mianwala AFB and leisurely blown up multiple jets, and Pakmil is sleeping, busy licking Afghan shoes clean, while shameless pseudo liberals and pashtun nationalists are begging to keep undocumented illegal refugees.
This was an intelligence failure, one that everyone here has accepted. Thanks for your input.A motivated and trained intruder is very difficult to be stopped by physical barriers like high walls.
High walls mostly create a false sense of security. Example -
Security personnel might get into a sense of lull believing that scaling a wall is very difficult. Example above shows that it is not. What if intruders take a JCB machine in a brazen attack like in Gaza?
There has to be adequate number of well trained guards deployed all around for gap free coverage. It has to be coupled with hi-tech surveillance, because humans have the tenderly to fail. What is the cost involved to provide this kind of security? Has to be very high. It may not be possible to maintain a highest level of security at all times.
That is where intelligence comes in play and security can be scaled up selectively on an input. Mianwali has a zig -zag kind of perimeter. That further creates an issue. It would become more difficult to secure it compared to a perimeter in straight line. The perimeter length is close to 16 Kms. The area to be defended is also a massive one, as shown in the pic below.View attachment 968689
Recent intrusion by Hamas in Gaza clearly shows that mere presence of barriers can’t stop a motivated and trained group. It has to be a multi-pronged strategy to stop an attack like this. Casualties are also bound to happen because the attackers have most of the advantages. That includes fidayeen mindset of being ready to die.
Most people here are analysing this as a tactical failure in terms of response by the teams on the ground. It wasn’t. If someone tries a similar attack at some other installation like an Air Force base, then it is likely to be as devastating as this one.
To be honest the security dynamics of Pakistan became fluid and perilous shortly after the start of the GWOT. Prior to that there was little in terms of border skirmishes or internal security threats bar dacoits in Sindh and BLA in Balochistan blowing up pipelines.first we need to distinguish between our friends and enemies. as soon as China start increasing its presence in Pakistan, few powers suddenly emerged for blocking that influences.
Your enemies are almost entirely internal. It's not outside powers' fault that you have so many internal fault lines.first we need to distinguish between our friends and enemies. as soon as China start increasing its presence in Pakistan, few powers suddenly emerged for blocking that influences.
Your enemies are almost entirely internal.
State has failed miserably in narrative building for the last 20 years. TTP was formed by tribes who declared Pakistan Kaafir for helping America hunt OBL. But if state pushed the narrative that OBL killed civilians in violation of Islamic rules of war, this would not be an issue.To be honest the security dynamics of Pakistan became fluid and perilous shortly after the start of the GWOT. Prior to that there was little in terms of border skirmishes or internal security threats bar dacoits in Sindh and BLA in Balochistan blowing up pipelines.
This is a knee jerk reaction that will backfire, deporting Afghans randomly is not a solution but a venting of frustration. I fail to see what tangible benefits v/s the costs Pakistan will get from this.I have to agree with your latter post, deport all Afghans. Those with children born here can be considered for naturalisation if they surrender their afghan nationality, those who are waiting for their visas to be processed for travel to western counties can stay provided the UNHCR and their new adopted countries provide assurances and the rest can return to Afghanistan.
The deportation of Afghan has been on the table since 2005. It has just been postponed for far too long.This is a knee jerk reaction that will backfire, deporting Afghans randomly is not a solution but a venting of frustration. I fail to see what tangible benefits v/s the costs Pakistan will get from this.
These attackers were illegal infiltrators from Afghanistan using gear sourced entirely from Afghanistan.This is a knee jerk reaction that will backfire, deporting Afghans randomly is not a solution but a venting of frustration. I fail to see what tangible benefits v/s the costs Pakistan will get from this.
You realise that both what you mentioned can be true as well as a link with India? (which has been historically proven already)
This is always how an insurgency works, you exploit existing problems or fault lines using sectarian or ethnic issues