What's new

Border incursions: Suspicions grow about Afghan support for TTP

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Jun 28, 2010
22,931
45
29,058
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Border incursions: Suspicions grow about Afghan support for TTP
By Naveed Hussain / Zia Khan
Published: September 11, 2011
ISLAMABAD/KARACHI:
Pakistan’s military believes the fugitive leaders of the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) are receiving outright support from militants as well as officials in Afghanistan, where they have found a safe haven.
The suspicion comes in the wake of an upsurge in cross-border incursions in Pakistan’s border regions led mainly by TTP militants and backed by their Afghan collaborators.
“The TTP senior cadres Maulana Fazlullah, Maulvi Faqir Muhammad and Abdul Wali, aka Omar Khalid, have been receiving support from local Afghan authorities and miscreants,” the military’s chief spokesperson Major-General Athar Abbas told The Express Tribune.

Maulana Fazlullah, also known as Mullah Radio, was the chief of TTP in Swat, while Maulvi Faqir and Omar Khalid headed the group in Bajaur and Mohmand, respectively.
Military officials have gone so far to accuse the authorities in northeastern Afghanistan of being complacent in these raids – a claim vehemently denied by Afghan officials.
The military itself does not directly blame them, but analysts believe some Afghan Taliban may be aiding their Pakistani namesakes, with or without approval from the group’s top hierarchy.
Hundreds of TTP insurgents had fled the military operations in the tribal regions of Bajaur, Mohmand and Malakand Division of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa to find a safe haven in the Afghan provinces of Kunar and Nuristan.
The exact number of TTP militants in Afghanistan is not known but Maj-Gen Abbas said that 200 to 300 militants have been mounting cross-border attacks in Dir and Chitral districts, suggesting they have a massive presence there.

Salfi Islam is the bedrock of al Qaeda’s ideology, which is also followed by the Taliban controlling Kunar and Nuristan. This ideological convergence brought the two closer to each other.
Qari Zia is believed to be once a close confidante of Osama bin Laden and hosted him once after his epic escape from the Tora Bora mountains in 2001.
Peshawar-based security analyst Brigadier (retd) Muhamaad Saad believes the Taliban are not a monolithic entity. “They can be divided into three broad categories: Kandahari Taliban, led by Mullah Omar; Pakti Taliban, led by Jalaluddin Haqqani and his son Sirajuddin Haqqani; and Salfi Taliban,” he said. “It’s the Salfi Taliban who pose a real threat to Pakistan. They may not be obeying the Taliban supreme leader Mullah Omar.” But the Afghan Taliban deny any schisms in the movement. “All mujahideen are united under the leadership of Mullah Omar,” Taliban spokesperson Zabiullah Mujahid told The Express Tribune by phone from an undisclosed location in Afghanistan.
A respected cleric who runs an Islamic seminary in Shekandai, a village on the border between Chitral and Nuristan, endorses Mujahid’s claim. “There is no evidence of Qari Zia’s group defying the authority of Mullah Omar,” said Maulana Jamal Abdul Nasir.
Two years ago, the Nuristan Taliban had kidnapped a Greek professor from Chitral. And they had offered to free him in return for the release of three Afghan commanders – Ustad Yasir, the second-in-command of the 1980s jihadi leader Abdul Rasool Sayyaf, Maulana Rehmatuddin Nuristani, a local commander from Nuristan and Maulvi Abdullah Akhund from Kandahar.
“This shows there are no differences between the Salfi Taliban and those led by Mullah Omar,” said Maulana Nasir. The Afghan Taliban do not interfere in the affairs of Afghanistan’s neighbouring countries. “No member of Taliban can go against the movement’s policy,” Mujahid said – blaming the TTP for all cross-border incursions. He also denied Qari Zia’s group was sheltering the TTP militants.
The governor of Nuristan province also appears to be exonerating the Afghan Taliban. “The Afghan Taliban have never carried out cross-border attacks in Pakistan,” Tameem Nuristani told The Express Tribune by phone from his home.
He also put the blame squarely on the TTP. “Look, they (Pakistani Taliban) have killed hundreds of people in bomb and suicide attacks across Pakistan, they’re Pakistan’s enemy,” he added. Nuristani, however, conceded that the TTP militants have found ‘safe havens’ in Kunar and Nuristan. Asked why the Afghan authorities do not move against them, Nuristani said, “Like Waziristan, we, too, have areas where the government’s writ does not exist.”
Scores of Pakistani military and paramilitary troops and policemen have been killed in cross-border raids by militants in Dir and Chitral districts. Last month, dozens of people were killed in militant attacks on security check posts in Chitral. And earlier this month, dozens of young men from Bajaur Agency were seized by TTP while they strayed across the border in Nuristan during an outing.
What is Pakistan doing to stop such raids?
“In Dir (Upper and Lower) extra troops have been deployed to man the border region. And in Chitral, new check posts are being set up at a bridge connecting the region with Afghanistan. We are sending huge reinforcements there,” said Maj-Gen Abbas.
The unnamed senior military official said the military was also encouraging formation of village defence committees in Chitral on the pattern of Amn committees (qaumi lashkars) in the tribal regions. But he conceded that local residents were unwilling to join, fearing reprisals from the militants.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 11th, 2011.
Border incursions: Suspicions grow about Afghan support for TTP – The Express Tribune
 
I wonder what the point is of airing such so called, "suspicions" - could it be that some interests wish to signal to the US and the world that Pakistani suspicions represent a threat to the Afghan state and only through the physical presence of the US (read Bases) can the investment in blood and treasure made in Afghanistan be secured?

Fact of the matter is that Al-Qaida is a growing power in Pakistan, instead of vigorously pursuing the financiers of this movement, Pakistan prefers to rely on US largesse - the US should deny Pakistan all funds required by its armed forces, only this can allow those armed forces to decide openly which side they are on - with a cut off of US funding, Pakistani armed forces may align with Al Qaida and that would make it all the more necessary to prevent nuclear weapons and scientists and the know how they have developed, from falling into the hands of terrorists -- with that done, the people of Pakistan can choose for themsleves if they want more of what the armed forces deliver to them, or not.
 
In other words NATO/USA are supporting Taliba. Isnt that old news ? We have knoews that long long time !!
 
Dialogue with Kabul: Islamabad wants border incursions stemmed



September 16, 2011

ISLAMABAD:

Pakistan will ask Afghanistan to check intrusions into its border territories by the Taliban allegedly based in Kunar and Nuristan provinces when top diplomatic officials from both sides open a fresh round of strategic talks today.

The meeting is taking place at a time when anger is mounting in Islamabad against Kabul’s ‘inability or unwillingness’ to control groups of Pakistani Taliban based in Afghanistan from carrying out attacks on border check posts. Incidentally, Washington has accused Islamabad of showing similar reluctance to control the Haqqani network and its alleged attacks on international troops in Afghanistan.

On Thursday, Islamabad reacted sharply to fresh US allegations that it was reluctant to go after the Haqqani network, warning that such claims could undermine anti-terror cooperation between the two countries.

Foreign Office spokesperson Tehmina Janjua said that the cause of anti-terrorism would be weakened by levelling allegations against Pakistan for this week’s attack on the US embassy in Kabul. The remarks came after US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta warned of unilateral action against the deadliest Afghan militant group believed to be based in the North Waziristan Agency.

“These remarks are not in line with the cooperation the two countries have in counter-terrorism,” said Janjua at her weekly briefing in a carefully-worded response to Panetta’s statement.

Last month, Pakistan sent a number of regular troops to man the border with Afghanistan in remote Dir and Chitral districts after the Taliban led by Maulvi Faqir Muhammad, a fugitive commander from Bajaur tribal region, launched multiple attacks there from across the border.

Thinly-veiled warning

US officials have held militants from the Haqqani network responsible for a 20-hour long assault on the embassy in Kabul. “Time and again we’ve urged the Pakistanis to exercise their influence over these kinds of attacks from the Haqqanis, and we have made very little progress in that area,” Panetta told reporters flying with him to San Francisco on Wednesday.

“I think the message they need to know is: we’re going to do everything we can to defend our forces.” But the Foreign Office spokesperson rejected the criticism, saying “terrorism and militancy are complex issues.”

Citing sovereignty

Janjua insisted that Pakistan’s cooperation with the US was based on respect for its sovereignty, warning that any unilateral move could damage relationship. “Pakistan’s cooperation is premised on respect for Pakistan’s sovereignty and entails joint actions,” she added.

The ‘other side’

In an attempt to deflect US pressure, the Foreign Office countered by raising concerns on the cross border raids allegedly led by Pakistani militants from Afghanistan where they are believed to have established ‘safe havens.’


Dialogue with Kabul: Islamabad wants border incursions stemmed – The Express Tribune
 
RM sometimes takes the place of defense minister and starts saying that army is gonna do this and that.

Never trust what comes out of the mouth of that guy!
 
Your interior minister, that's what Rehman Malik is.

His word is the official word of Pakistan.

So, you are gonna tell us who our minister is?

He is a do numbri Jack*** who does not know jack what he is saying.
 
So, you are gonna tell us who our minister is?

He is a do numbri Jack*** who does not know jack what he is saying.

Your frustration is acknowledged.

However, fact remains that the word of your interior minister is the word of Pakistan.
 
Well, true that, but these days, we don't take his words really seriously.

but when he speaks he speaks for Pakistan as the interior minister of Pakistan.

That's why his words are the voice of Pakistan for international community and outsiders like me and the comity of nations.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom