The problem is simple. Pakistani do not have enough infrastructure for a diverse and vibrant film industry
Even what even movies they make are cheap china brand copy of Bollywood.

Yeh keh kon raha hy
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The problem is simple. Pakistani do not have enough infrastructure for a diverse and vibrant film industry
Even what even movies they make are cheap china brand copy of Bollywood.

There was no India before '47. As much as I have heard in this forum. Was there any country called India before 15th Aug 47? Heck Pakistan have their Independence day before us!how can you break something which was not even existing. What Jinnah broke was a British colony. So there is nothing for me to admit there.

A certain blood telegram might have made your own formermen country some what ... unhappy, isn't it? Yet you forgot to mention that! How cute!![]()
Add all the muslims killed in India in past 50 years and also add all the other minorities killed. Then compare it with the brutal killings of operation search light. No wonder your nation broke while ours --still having many imperfection-- keep on going strong. You see there is a difference in faltering, falling and getting back at your feet AND breaking your leg -- permanently.
Yeah Yeah! There is! It is called the great and mighty USA! State of Alaska? Hawaii? Never heard them brooding and breaking apart. Hawaii is infact too far from mainland USA.
Then why the hell Pakistan didn't refuse from being east bengal from being a part pakistan from the beginning? Two nation theory had roots in Iqbal's speech in 1930 in Allahabad or even before that! Was his and Jinnah's vision so clouded that he saw the impossibility of Hindu Muslim living together but NOT the impossibility of Urdu Speaking folks of West and Bengali Speaking folks of east living together? Or presence of hostile India sorrounding East Pakistan?
Infact even today your thinking that --base in Karachi/Islamabad-- shows your ignorance and arrogance! The entire narrative that 'Defence/Upward mobility of East Pakistan lies in West' was stupid to begin with! The dominance of Punjab fat-arse politicians in Pakistani politics broke it. You treated East Pakistani as sub-ordinates and no wonder they left you!
No wonder she chose nothing to do with East Pakistan once broken -- she only hailed them as a free nation with free capital and done with it.
Even more! Even if B'deshi at that time would have begged her to let them join India, she would have refused it! for the above mention reason.
Okay then name Two nations? One Hindu nation ie Hindustan and Two???muslim nations ie Pakistan and B'desh. As we say, it literally does not add up
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It was a mere resolution and was never adapted into practice as there were only two states which were formed.
Sikandar Hayat khan, Punjab Premier and leader of the Unionist Party, who had drafted the resolution, declared in a Punjab assembly sppech on 1 march 1941 that he was opposed to the Pakistan that would mean “Muslim Raj here and Hindhu Raj elsewhere… If Pakistan means then I will have nothing to do with it” . He reiterated his plea for a loose, confederation with considerable autonomy for the confederating units. In his mind 'States' were contiguous regions in India where Muslim were given autonomy and India would perhaps be a federation.
Partition on religious ground was something which Jinnah had in mind and his idea was of two nation. Hindu one and one for Muslim. That is what happened. Obviously later his idea failed spectecularly.
For me, India is the land of secularism and freedom. Religion isn't forced upon you here. If it is, in some rural areas, you can always move to a city.
Just in case you want to shake India from its very foundation to a national collapse, you have to close Bollywood. You should know how.
lol, srsly ?the event’s most outstandingly awful moment came with a dance performance in which two sets of Indian actors, each consisting of a man and a woman engaged in a romantic dance, were suddenly attacked by terrorists adorned in stereotypical “Islamic terrorist” garb bearing lightsaber-like guns.
The U.S. military then swept in and saved the dancers. Following the heroic rescue, the dancers and military men stood for the U.S. national anthem and then danced together to Bruce Springsteen’s “Born in the U.S.A.”




Ae mere Rehnuma, aapki khidmat mein is naachez ka Adaab Arz hei!Adaab
Mizaaj Sharif Muhtarma
Ae mere Rehnuma, aapki khidmat mein is naachez ka Adaab Arz hei!
Bas aapkee hi dua hein mere sarparast varna is nacheez ka kya. Aaj yahan, kal na jaane kahan.Rehnuma ki zarorat apko nahi.
Raasta ap bakhoobi khud jaanti hai. Pehchanti hai.
Rehnuma to sirf nishandahi krta hai.
Haal ahwaal baab asbaab sab behtar hain? Khata kalami ki maazrat.
Bas aapkee hi dua hein mere sarparast varna is nacheez ka kya. Aaj yahan, kal na jaane kahan.
South indians dont watch hindi movies (extremely less)..they are as patriotic as any other north indian.. (I am a south indian too)...what unites india is its thousands of years of culture and religion.Why did Mahmud of Ghazni invade India 17 times?
Because he agreed with me that a strong neighbour under Hinduvta was a threat and peaceful coexistence was not a choice.
I didn't say it was Pakistan. It was India since Indira Gandhi was a child herself. Bollywood is the key to unite India as if it's an ideology.
With around 35% of the population being illiterate, films constitute an extremely significant medium to reach the majority of the population and unite it through the construction of a common imaginary.
172 million Muslims of India including millions of Kashmiris.
In very simple words: no Bollywood, no India.
Mere Huzoor,Why is Bollywood a North Indian/Brahmin monopoly?
172 million Muslims of India including millions of Kashmiris.
In very simple words: no Bollywood, no India.
Mere Huzoor,
Bollywood goes through eras and changes favorites like fashion.
Starting with actresses, my elder siblings have a thing for South Indian actresses in Bollywood. Sridevi --a south indian actress-- once ruled the hearts of millions in India. At that time, dance was of prominent importance. Those actresses who used to practice classical south Indian dance were supposedly great at controlling their facial expressions and were able to convey all types of emotions using their facial expressions. So south Indian heroins used to rule the roost there. IIRC there were others like sridevi as well. Then came Madhuri Dixit, a Brahmin and north Indian, from the same lines. She also had a mastery of dance and she remained favourite of bollywood. Together with her was Juhi Chawla, a Punjabi actress with beautiful features she was sort of second to her. The current era is dominated by looks mostly and acting and expression plays second fiddle and we Indian being crazy for white skin prefer those actresses with fair complexion.
Now with actors, in the past there were certain image of actors which were very popular. in 80s movies -- contemporary with sridevi, angry young man was a popular sterotype and like of Amitabh Bacchan --A hindu non brahmin with punjabi mother-- got really hit at that time. Then we had likes of Anil kapoor who were popular with similar image in 90s, an example would be Tejaab where he acted against Madhuri Dixit. Then among a certain portion of population -- mainly lower middle class -- angry poor young man kind of heros were very popular. Mithun Chakraborty -- A bengali brahaman-- comes to mind. These heros had no formal training in finer arts like dancing and used to do whatever was fanciful on screen. This is why some of their dance songs looked similar to monkeys jumping. Then came Hritik Roshan --A Kashmiri pundit IIRC-- and he changed the entire dancing actor scene in India. He had a very good control over his body and a formal training in dance so he became an instant hit. He laid the foundation of agile and young heros stereotype which is still continuing. In parallel, also came the empire of Muslim actors, the Khans of Indian film industy, Amir, Sharukh, Salmaan who captured the young romantic hero and college student image, which was very popular back in 90s. They have diversified but they still play that image from time to time.
So you see, It is much less of a particular caste or religion or region but skills like dancing which was dominated by south actresses, fairness of skin and in fashion sterotype or image which has decided who ruled the roost in Bollywood. Actors and actresses from all the communities and religons and regions had their time and it comes and goes. If only, the north east Indian are really under representated in our film industry.
Is nacheez ko bas itna hi ilm hei. Umeed hei ki aap ko pasand aaye!
You might be surprised at the title of this thread, but I have found this the strongest string that unites India's multilingual, multicultural, multi-religious masses and a multitude of issues and problems.
Bollywood is the opium of masses.
Hamzay
Conclusion: India doesn't have an ideology like the 'Two Nation Theory' that created Pakistan. So, India has to 'sedate her wild populations' with Bollywood. This is the cheap vision of this 'great country'.
your greatest but not cheap ideology is making suicide bombers and spreading terrorism to create unrest in the entire world and certainly that unites pakistanis even more cuz you have nothing else to do.