What's new

‘Behaving very badly’: NATO boss has Australia’s back on China ‘bullying’

Vanguard One

FULL MEMBER
Dec 20, 2019
1,307
-7
1,059
Country
Ireland
Location
Ireland
London: NATO’s Secretary-General has vowed to back Australia in its disputes with China, saying the superpower “had behaved very badly against Australia” after it pushed for an inquiry into the origins of the coronavirus.

Jens Stoltenberg said he wanted to expand the trans-Atlantic body to non-members as a way for “like-minded democracies” to stand up to what he called bullying by Beijing.

1616620557330.png

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg wants democracies to stand together and up to China.CREDIT: AP


Stoltenberg is pursuing an ambitious broadening of NATO’s mission in the next decade. His strategy focuses heavily on pushing back against authoritarian Russia and China and calls for greater involvement of non-NATO member countries from the Asia-Pacific region.

Asked by the Herald and The Age to outline what greater co-operation would involve, Stoltenberg said it was vital to show a united front in the face of bad behaviour.

“They have behaved very badly against Australia after Australia asked for an independent investigation into the origins of coronavirus,” he said from Brussels during a virtual news conference.

“It is important to demonstrate we’re able to stand together when we see China trying to bully countries all over the world.”
Foreign ministers from NATO’s 30 member nations are meeting in Brussels to discuss adopting “a more global outlook”.

NATO bonds Europe and the United States and was formed in the shadow of World War II to deal with the threat of the Soviet Union and prevent further conflict in Europe. It considers an attack on any member state an attack on all.

Stoltenberg recounted being on the receiving end of Beijing’s retaliation in 2010 when he was prime minister of Norway and the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to the democracy activist Liu Xiaobo.

Liu supported the student uprising that ended in the Tiananmen Square massacre and was a frequent critic of the Chinese government. He received the prize for his non-violent struggle for fundamental human rights in China.

1616620621531.png

ritish soldiers with the NATO-led Resolute Support Mission arrive at the site of an attack in Kabul, Afghanistan, last year. More co-operation would not necessarily mean NATO forces in the Asia Pacific.CREDIT: AP


“China just immediately imposed a lot of heavy measures against Norway,” Stoltenberg recalled. It did not normalise ties with Norway until six years later when Norway promised it would “do its best to avoid any future damage to the bilateral relations”.

“So, this is a behaviour that just calls on all like-minded democracies to stand together,” Stoltenberg said.

“Of course we do that as 30 allies in NATO but we also see the value of doing that with like-minded countries like Australia, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea in the Asia-Pacific region.”

He said this could involve an exchange of information and jointly participating in unspecified “activities”.

1616620661934.png

An Australian Bushmaster in a cloud of dust while providing protection for NATO-led Reconstruction Task Force troops in southern Afghanistan.CREDIT: FILE


“But first of all, I think we should sit down and see how we can gradually expand and strengthen our partnership,” he said.
Stoltenberg visited Australia in 2019 and nominated fighting terrorism, including Islamic State, bolstering NATO’s cyber defences and dealing with China’s economic and military might as future areas of greater collaboration.

Canberra’s world-leading ban on Huawei building Australia’s 5G telecoms network has since been adopted by the United States and Britain. NATO members are under pressure to ensure their telecommunications systems are reliable as part of Stoltenberg’s call for nations to adopt “whole of society resilience” strategy.

Rory Medcalf, the head of ANU’s National Security College, said it was logical for Australia to collaborate more with NATO, but that would not mean seeing NATO forces in the Indo-Pacific nor an Australian physical presence in Europe.

“Because security is global and doesn’t respect geographical boundaries what we can usefully do together is work on protecting our critical infrastructure, on cyber, on espionage and foreign interference,” Medcalf said.

”And in the long-run, Australia and NATO collaborating on the global power balance — managing China and Russia — is actually more important to both sides than our collaboration on terrorism, which is how Australia and NATO originally got together.“

Australia has been working with NATO since 2005 and is one of six countries considered an “enhanced” partner alongside Finland, Georgia, Jordan, Sweden and Ukraine.

Australia provides support to NATO’s missions in Afghanistan and Iraq and in 2018 took part in the NATO military exercise Trident Juncture in Norway that involved 50,000 participants from 21 nations.

Foreign Minister Marise Payne and Prime Minister Scott Morrison were contacted for comment.

 
Looks like everything is back to what it was pre trump. Say China/Russia/Iran being naughty and behaving badly and do nothing for another generation while they grow lol.
 
London: NATO’s Secretary-General has vowed to back Australia in its disputes with China, saying the superpower “had behaved very badly against Australia” after it pushed for an inquiry into the origins of the coronavirus.

Jens Stoltenberg said he wanted to expand the trans-Atlantic body to non-members as a way for “like-minded democracies” to stand up to what he called bullying by Beijing.

View attachment 727720
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg wants democracies to stand together and up to China.CREDIT: AP


Stoltenberg is pursuing an ambitious broadening of NATO’s mission in the next decade. His strategy focuses heavily on pushing back against authoritarian Russia and China and calls for greater involvement of non-NATO member countries from the Asia-Pacific region.

Asked by the Herald and The Age to outline what greater co-operation would involve, Stoltenberg said it was vital to show a united front in the face of bad behaviour.

“They have behaved very badly against Australia after Australia asked for an independent investigation into the origins of coronavirus,” he said from Brussels during a virtual news conference.

“It is important to demonstrate we’re able to stand together when we see China trying to bully countries all over the world.”
Foreign ministers from NATO’s 30 member nations are meeting in Brussels to discuss adopting “a more global outlook”.

NATO bonds Europe and the United States and was formed in the shadow of World War II to deal with the threat of the Soviet Union and prevent further conflict in Europe. It considers an attack on any member state an attack on all.

Stoltenberg recounted being on the receiving end of Beijing’s retaliation in 2010 when he was prime minister of Norway and the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to the democracy activist Liu Xiaobo.

Liu supported the student uprising that ended in the Tiananmen Square massacre and was a frequent critic of the Chinese government. He received the prize for his non-violent struggle for fundamental human rights in China.

View attachment 727726
ritish soldiers with the NATO-led Resolute Support Mission arrive at the site of an attack in Kabul, Afghanistan, last year. More co-operation would not necessarily mean NATO forces in the Asia Pacific.CREDIT: AP


“China just immediately imposed a lot of heavy measures against Norway,” Stoltenberg recalled. It did not normalise ties with Norway until six years later when Norway promised it would “do its best to avoid any future damage to the bilateral relations”.

“So, this is a behaviour that just calls on all like-minded democracies to stand together,” Stoltenberg said.

“Of course we do that as 30 allies in NATO but we also see the value of doing that with like-minded countries like Australia, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea in the Asia-Pacific region.”

He said this could involve an exchange of information and jointly participating in unspecified “activities”.

View attachment 727729
An Australian Bushmaster in a cloud of dust while providing protection for NATO-led Reconstruction Task Force troops in southern Afghanistan.CREDIT: FILE


“But first of all, I think we should sit down and see how we can gradually expand and strengthen our partnership,” he said.
Stoltenberg visited Australia in 2019 and nominated fighting terrorism, including Islamic State, bolstering NATO’s cyber defences and dealing with China’s economic and military might as future areas of greater collaboration.

Canberra’s world-leading ban on Huawei building Australia’s 5G telecoms network has since been adopted by the United States and Britain. NATO members are under pressure to ensure their telecommunications systems are reliable as part of Stoltenberg’s call for nations to adopt “whole of society resilience” strategy.

Rory Medcalf, the head of ANU’s National Security College, said it was logical for Australia to collaborate more with NATO, but that would not mean seeing NATO forces in the Indo-Pacific nor an Australian physical presence in Europe.

“Because security is global and doesn’t respect geographical boundaries what we can usefully do together is work on protecting our critical infrastructure, on cyber, on espionage and foreign interference,” Medcalf said.

”And in the long-run, Australia and NATO collaborating on the global power balance — managing China and Russia — is actually more important to both sides than our collaboration on terrorism, which is how Australia and NATO originally got together.“

Australia has been working with NATO since 2005 and is one of six countries considered an “enhanced” partner alongside Finland, Georgia, Jordan, Sweden and Ukraine.

Australia provides support to NATO’s missions in Afghanistan and Iraq and in 2018 took part in the NATO military exercise Trident Juncture in Norway that involved 50,000 participants from 21 nations.

Foreign Minister Marise Payne and Prime Minister Scott Morrison were contacted for comment.

Wait ...... my young padwan Lerner wait.....

I am going to give Biden his first 100 days before passing judgment.

so far he has not impressed me with going big so he probably is going home!

1) America has not come out guns blazing against China , if the worst they can do is some meaningless sanctions against a few government officials in China than America chicken is cooked

2) the Americans reigned in in modi ..... Thor peace on the LOC. The Americans don’t want a conflict with China

3) the Afghan debocale , they want their pet dog to commit ritual suicide and Allow a national unity government of the taliban.... this stuff can not write itself better


4) they sent two carrier groups to South China Sea but did not conduct exercises

5) Australia is a lost cause all the bluster but no way to help the Australian economy, what will happen as trade deficit increases in Australia and services have to be reduced for the Australian people and taxes increased!

6) corna virus recovery from the us requires China’s support . What happens when democratic USA has farmers out of work and protesting against Biden..........

7) what happens as European Chinese trade increases where China creates a market for European countries and not the us . Will the Europeans stick with the American....

Biden has clearly taken the middle road and for his first term he has to un trump the international stage to build alliances. This means no aggressive steps against China. A week has not passed with the Chinese responding by identifying the many weaknesses of America for 15 minutes to the top American diplomat in view of the public. The Americans were stunned on how the world has changed since the last time Biden was in power.

wait and see I think we might get 18 more f-16s and the 12 cobras. Imagine what would happen to Americans pshyche if the Pakistani refuse to resupply the forces in Afghanistan. Imagine Biden being blamed for the lost war in Afghanistan like Nixon was for the Vietnam war.

k
 
The military industrial complex wins again. It will be the downfall of Western "Democracies" Plutocracies. This NATO's idiots job depends on perpetual warfare. There should be no surprise in this. China needs to wake up and start solidifying its alliances.


How the hell is China bullying. Some people live in a la la land.
China is a nation 2000+ years old, that went through 200 years of incredible oppression by these very "so called countries". They forced China to import opium, and when they refused they laid siege to China, eventually taking over Shanghai and splitting it and other parts like pirates dividing up the booty. They forced China's hand in Macau and Hong Kong and ruled over these lands with an iron fist. They then supported a Dictatorial ruler who ran away with an entire Chinese province. Prior to that the Rape of Nanking killing of millions of Chinese by the cultured Japanese who have had a history on attempting to invade mainland China. All of this while these countries were running democracies. But I guess the "Oriental" is less than human and democracy is now nothing but a plutocracy for the rich class which is predominately white and Christian.

So I am not about to hear any bullshit from EU or Western countries who try and sell me about human rights and civil rights, when they still overlord over other peoples lands all over the world from places like Gibraltar, to Australia, to Deigo Garcia in the Indian Ocean, to Falklands etc (800+ global bases). All the while in the last 30-40 years have systematically slaughtered brown people all over the world, while still maintaining a multi-class system of justice for White and Non-Whites in their own lands, and allowing a complete Apartheid first in South Africa and now in Israel (while slowing sliding their societies into fascist systems in place like Poland, Hungary and even France where Liberty is only for Christian white people and not the people of North African descent. And prior to this for 100+ years, raped the entire globe through colonialism which they still perpetuate through global financial institutions. So till these Western nations fix their own houses and alliances with the worlds oppressors (Saudi/Egypt etc) they should shut up and fix their own house. When they are in a position to speak from a position of authority, honesty and morality then we can have a proper discussion. Otherwise call it as what is: A BRAZEN ATTEMPT TO CONTINUE PERPETUATING THEIR GLOBAL PLUNDER without question.

This has been the way of empires and will continue to be the way. Give me some other gospel to swallow, I refuse to be a useful idiot buying into this anti-China garbage.

If you want to talk about rights: lets discuss Catalina, Washington DC, Puerto Rico, Hawaii, American Samoa and US Virgin Islands. And lest we forget the massacre and expulsion of the "Chinaman" in the 18/19th centuries after the railroad boom, where their cheap--enslaved labor was used.
 
:sarcastic: :sarcastic: :sarcastic:
it is just a case of NATO and Australia supporting and covering each other military warcrimes in Afghanistan and elsewhere.

The NATO chief is much worried that after Australia, Chinese News Media may also exposed these NATO sins there as well.

 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom