What's new

Bangladesh rises four places on democracy index, classified as a hybrid regime

Black_cats

ELITE MEMBER
Dec 31, 2010
10,032
-5
14,469
Bangladesh rises four places on Democracy Index
2019-01-09 16:50:48
News Desk bdnews24.com

https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.bdnews24.com/amp/en/detail/politics/1580435

Democracy-Index.jpg


Bangladesh has gained four places on the latest Democracy Index, compared to the previous year, according to the Economist Intelligence Unit.

That falls in line with the EIU’s finding that Asia recorded the highest improvement in its score out of any region.

Bangladesh ranks 88th with an overall score of 5.57 on the Democracy Index 2018, compared to the 92nd position with a score of 5.43 a year ago. Bangladesh’s score on the Democracy Index 2017 fell to its lowest in a decade.

Despite gains on the latest index, Bangladesh is still classified as a hybrid regime and is way behind India, a flawed democracy, that climbed only one notch to the 41st spot.

Overall, the report comes as good news to Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina who formed a government for an unprecedented fourth term amid allegations of vote rigging from the opposition alliance.

The report reveals that despite a growing disillusionment with formal political institutions, political participation is on the rise in almost every region around the world, with the population being spurred into political action.

The index which assesses the global state of democracy in 2018 also reveals that in the past decade, women’s political participation has improved more than any other single indicator in the model.

China rose nine places in the global ranking, although it remains classified as an authoritarian regime and its climb in the index mainly reflects the worsening scores of other countries in the index, particularly in Latin America and Eastern Europe.

Sri Lanka fell back more than any other country in the region. It saw a marked decrease in its score from 6.48 in 2017 to 6.19, driven by a worsening in the functioning of government and in civil liberties.

The country plunged into a constitutional crisis in late October when the president, Maithripala Sirisena, announced the dismissal of the prime minister, Ranil Wickremesinghe, replacing him with an ally, Mahinda Rajapaksa (who served as president in 2005-15).

The EIU report released on Wednesday says only countries with scores above 8 are categorised as "full" democracies.

Little change was felt in Asia’s two largest democracies: India (ranked 41st) and Indonesia (65th). Both are readying themselves for elections in 2019.

The campaign period in Indonesia kicked off in September. Running for a second term, the president, Joko Widodo (known as Jokowi), will lack the advantage he had when he ran in 2014 of being a newcomer pressing for reform.

In India, the image of the prime minister, Narendra Modi, resonates with an aspiring middle class, and Modi has also maintained the support of business. But Modi is not unassailable; a lack of attention to the rural economy has fuelled anti-government protests by farmers, according to the EIU report.

In his term, moreover, job growth has been poor, institutional reforms have been slow to come, and those that have been passed have been poorly implemented.

So far, Modi has managed to deflect criticism, but his party, the Bharatiya Janata Party—the largest in the ruling National Democratic Alliance coalition—will be contesting the 2019 elections on a weak footing at state level. Having also lost the support of many small regional parties, the coalition could fail to gain a clear majority in parliament
 
Very impressed with BD govt. Ever since they made an effort to be secular they are going places . Well done.
 
This is a good one. :lol:

Very impressed with BD govt. Ever since they made an effort to be secular they are going places . Well done.

We have always been a secular country by constitution and by law. Most of the Bangladeshis believe that religion is a personal thing and should be practiced as such. That lays the foundation for whatever success we made.
 
off topic :
We are democratic nation and it is already proven in 30 December , :secret::alcoholic::suicide::suicide2::closed:Will meet you in afterlife !
to say the lease, bangladesh must be the most democratic country in the world... it's people created a country, then destroyed it to build another, then killed the person who led the destruction of the previous one.... then killed the person who knew something about the killings of the former.... put this in autopilot and their daughter and wife each got a chance to bite each others legs off... if this is not democracy what is?
 
to say the lease, bangladesh must be the most democratic country in the world... it's people created a country, then destroyed it to build another, then killed the person who led the destruction of the previous one.... then killed the person who knew something about the killings of the former.... put this in autopilot and their daughter and wife each got a chance to bite each others legs off... if this is not democracy what is?
Yes indeed. That's the reason Alexander said, "Oh seleucus what a strange country this is"!

However @Michael Corleone, peoples are crying for democracy, but was Bangladesh actually ever democratic? Look at the elections after independence. Other than 1991 and 1996 when elections were not rigged ? I would say that 1986 election was actually better than all other elections other than those two fair election ( 91 and 96) . As Ershad won 153 seats in 1986 and that is atleast not super majority!
@Homo Sapiens , what say you? Here is the result of 1986 election.
Where is our voice of democracy? Ershad won 153 seats and AL won 76 . Now why should we not believe that Ershad can win atleast 76 seats in future? Only because BNP formed govt in 1991election? I believe 1986 was the restoration of democracy not 1991 ! Even Jamati islami, the paramour of BNP participated in that 1986 election!
So what actually made Ershad very bad and others angels? Just because Hasina does not like presidential form ( that was passed by that parliament) ?
In reality Bangladesh was never ever democratic , all were eye wash! Or everything thing is democratic!!
 
Last edited:
What is the difference between a secular bengali as a state of India or state by itself?
Should Indian bengali seek to be stand alone bengali state?
No they need to be less of commies in west Bengal. That was the problem. After independence a d early 50s WB was in good place and industrially comparable. The communists came to power and ruined it

This is a good one. :lol:



We have always been a secular country by constitution and by law. Most of the Bangladeshis believe that religion is a personal thing and should be practiced as such. That lays the foundation for whatever success we made.
I thought in the eighties you were an islamic state?
Bd should become like indonesia soon.
 
Yes indeed. That's the reason Alexander said, "Oh seleucus what a strange country this is"!

However @Michael Corleone, peoples are crying for democracy, but was Bangladesh actually ever democratic? Look at the elections after independence. Other than 1991 and 1996 when elections were not rigged ? I would say that 1986 election was actually better than all other elections other than those two fair election ( 91 and 96) . As Ershad won 153 seats in 1986 and that is atleast not super majority!
@Homo Sapiens , what say you? Here is the result of 1986 election.
Where is our voice of democracy? Ershad won 153 seats and AL won 76 . Now why should we not believe that Ershad can win atleast 76 seats in future? Only because BNP formed govt in 1991election? I believe 1986 was the restoration of democracy not 1991 ! Even Jamati islami, the paramour of BNP participated in that 1986 election!
So what actually made Ershad very bad and others angels? Just because Hasina does not like presidential form ( that was passed by that parliament) ?
In reality Bangladesh was never ever democratic , all were eye wash! Or everything thing is democratic!!
for country with on average uncivilized people, democracy does more harm than good. maybe a day will come when this rigging wouldn't be needed and democracy will be essential for bd... but for now... stable long term govt is needed the most
 
for country with on average uncivilized people, democracy does more harm than good. maybe a day will come when this rigging wouldn't be needed and democracy will be essential for bd... but for now... stable long term govt is needed the most
Hm not bad idea, at least I am feeling now.
AL won with mass rigging, yet no chaos, except some isolated case no violence happened. I am always a supporter of democracy, but now I feel that if we need to see violence after every democratic election , then perhaps autocracy is better. But it's too early to reach to any conclusion.
Let AL rule 4 years atleast , let's see what they can do for peoples, and how many good works they do.
So after observing 4 years we can draw the conclusion if autocratic regime is good or bad.
But surely sheikh Hasina is very good hearted lady, but the problem is she wants flattery, sycophancy, (but I don't blame it much it's their family tradition and also a major problem of Bengali nation), but this time I hope she will be changed and act as mature leader .
And if Hasina can prove herself as worthy autocratic ruler ( after 4 years) then I will want her in power for 2030, and then maybe she will resign as she will be 82 years by this time .
And later I want 3 party in Bangladesh, and all will be totally free from militant islamic political parties.
Yes islamic parties can do political activity but brain Wasing militant Islam should not be allowed .
And also no alliance between big political parties ( if there will be 3) so no one even can get simple majority of 151 seat alone ( super majority is out of question) , and I think in this way true democracy will be elevated in Bangladesh .
Now let's wait for future.

However @Michael Corleone, what do you think of returning of presidential form again? I think a president can do better than a prime minister in our country . If we need autocratic ruler, we need it as a executive President, it's my opinion.
 
Last edited:
However @Michael Corleone, what do you think of returning of presidential form again? I think a president can do better than a prime minister in our country . If we need autocratic ruler, we need it as a executive President, it's my opinion.
it's more ideal for bangladesh tbh
lady, but the problem is she wants flattery, sycophancy,
too much of that and she'll face her father's fate, that's the reality
 
too much of that and she'll face her father's fate, that's the reality
But she is changing and old cabinet is gone, and most ministers are new . So I wish she learned from past. So maybe sycophants will not be beneficial now. Let's have good wishes for her .
it's more ideal for bangladesh tbh
Right, besides article 70 already made parliamentary system a dirty joke in Bangladesh.
What's the point of parliamentary system if it ( the system) gives executive branch superiority to legislative branch?
 
I thought in the eighties you were an islamic state?
Bd should become like indonesia soon.

Not really. Never been an Islamic country. Dont confuse it with the fact that we are a secular nation with practicing muslim population.
Haven't digged into the Indonesian way but Turkish scheme seems to be more popular around here.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom